It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Grambler
Trump broke laws lol..
I still don’t see how you even remotely see a win here..
I guarantee you avanetti made sure it was legal or he would have leaked the records anonymously..
He didn’t need to sign his name to it.. if he could be charged or debarred. He does it anonymously..
You are literally making the argument that it doesn’t matter if trump committed crimes, because other people did too..
.
I guarantee you avanetti made sure it was legal or he would have leaked the records anonymously..
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Boadicea
Just the logic of him choosing to leak it publicly when he didn’t have to . Plus the fact he is a lawyer means he has access to legal advise from both his education and other lawyers..
Wanna bet on it??
Not a money bet, but a gentleman’s bet for bragging rights...
13 Angry Democrats
So then you agree with my guarantee lol..
HE CHOSE WILLINGLY AND VOLUNTARILY to sign his name to it..
That means the publicity dwarfs any legal ramifications...
So, where dic he get the info? IMO, it came from discovery and it came from the raid on Cohens office.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: bulwarkz
So, where dic he get the info? IMO, it came from discovery and it came from the raid on Cohens office.
More likely what is known as a third party subpoena to the banks. A subpoena from Avenatti.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Why not? A subpoena for the deposit records of Michael Cohen would have not produced those records?
This does not explain at all the bank records for TWO different Michael Cohen.
Because they were provided in response to a subpoena for the deposit records of Michael Cohen?
Why else would all these very intelligent investigators assume 2 seperate people with the same name are the same person?
Avenatti? No. But he's made it quite clear he doesn't like Trump. I don't either.
Remember Trump has already filed to run for Prez in 2020. Are these people now interfering with our elections?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: bulwarkz
Why not? A subpoena for the deposit records of Michael Cohen would have not produced those records?
This does not explain at all the bank records for TWO different Michael Cohen.
Because they were provided in response to a subpoena for the deposit records of Michael Cohen?
Why else would all these very intelligent investigators assume 2 seperate people with the same name are the same person?
Avenatti? No. But he's made it quite clear he doesn't like Trump. I don't either.
Remember Trump has already filed to run for Prez in 2020. Are these people now interfering with our elections?