Feds probing how Stormy lawyer got Cohen’s banking info

a reply to: Phage

OK, I can agree with that. I would place most of the speculation towards Trump as 'wild' (or irrelevant) and most of the speculation towards Avenatti, Hillary, Comey, Lynch, et al. as less 'wild.'

Your mileage may vary.

Does this mean I don't get my unicorn ride?

TheRedneck

a reply to: TheRedneck

BWAHAHAHA

Who told you that lol..

It would take a cop or FBI agent stealing them to make it inadmissible..

If you could make evidence disappear just by leaking it to the media and claiming it was stolen. No body goes to jail. Lol


Now I bet they are considered public record lol.. since they have been reported by the media..

For example..


If you kill someone and I steal the gun and take it to the cops. They still get to use the gun against you..

If the DA or a cop stole it , it might be inadmissible..


The FBI would just tell a judge “look every media source is reporting X, Y and Z crimes have been committed. We want a warrant to check..

a reply to: JoshuaCox

He is a lawyer..

So you don't think it is possible for a lawyer to violate the law?

Phage seems to have backed out... so can I get a ride on your unicorn?

TheRedneck

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Who told you that lol..

A lawyer.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: xuenchen

He is a lawyer and knew he was signing his name to the release..


Don’t you think he double and triple checked the legality of the releasing it????

TheRedneck

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: burntheships

No him stealing the documents is stealing..


He is a lawyer.. you don’t think he made sure it was legal before he did it?!?!


He could have just as easily dropped them in the mail with no return address..


He wants his name on it..

Another crime. Using the United States Postal Service
to send illegally obtained bank documents.

Try again....

He likely got them from a slimy lawyer on Mueller's team,
you know one of those 13 Angry Democrats.

Avenatti is a known Dem operative, a sleazy one at that.
He also owes over 5 million in back taxes.

Carry on....

Here's an interesting SCOTUS case which may be applicable.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: TheRedneck

I don’t think it is very likely a lawyer would publicly break the law on national TV over a leak he started and was able to plan out how things went..

a reply to: JoshuaCox

I doubt it.

]

a reply to: butcherguy

From foreign donators? Umm no.

a reply to: burntheships

1% inaccurate and 99% accurate. So let's focus on the 1%

a reply to: TheRedneck

Haha again.. lol


Cohen didn’t know this would all be public record.. in fact it is pretty obvious the only reason anyone uses Cohen at all is because it is a shady backroom deal they want kept quite..




Daniel’s lawyer knew he was signing his name to it publicly..

a reply to: burntheships


A) no one is an avenatti fan lol..

If he went to jail for leaking cohens records, and it led to trumps fall.. no one would shed a tear for Avenatti..


What was that rick and morty quote???

“Your using Disney bucks at a ceasers palace” lol


No one cares if avametti goes down lol..


B) the whole point of using the postal service or hell using a midnight drop box is anonymity...

C) avanetti didn’t need to sign his name to the release.. he chose to.. for free..

Well for the benefits the publicity would do to his career..

You can be damn sure he checked the legality of it first..


Cohen is specifically the slimeball lawyer who does illegal stuff for you quietly.. that’s why he did illegal stuff .. he didn’t think it would hit the media..

Cohen intentionally didn’t PUBLICLY sign his name to all those illegal donations..

if he had it would likely be legal because our system is screwed because pay for play and insider trading are legal if you report it.

a reply to: burntheships


A) no one is an avenatti fan lol..

If he went to jail for leaking cohens records, and it led to trumps fall.. no one would shed a tear for Avenatti..


What was that rick and morty quote???

“Your using Disney bucks at a ceasers palace” lol


No one cares if avametti goes down lol..


B) the whole point of using the postal service or hell using a midnight drop box is anonymity...

C) avanetti didn’t need to sign his name to the release.. he chose to.. for free..

Well for the benefits the publicity would do to his career..

You can be damn sure he checked the legality of it first..


Cohen is specifically the slimeball lawyer who does illegal stuff for you quietly.. that’s why he did illegal stuff .. he didn’t think it would hit the media..

Cohen intentionally didn’t PUBLICLY sign his name to all those illegal donations..

if he had it would likely be legal because our system is screwed because pay for play and insider trading are legal if you report it.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Look at the op history..


I didn’t read them, so maybe the titles are the opposite from the point being made.. and if so I absolutely apologize..

But the OP titles are all conservative propaganda.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: burntheships


A) no one is an avenatti fan lol..

If he went to jail for leaking cohens records, and it led to trumps fall.. no one would shed a tear for Avenatti..

Thank you for admitting what so many of us already knew.

You don’t care if laws are broken so long as it hurts trump

a reply to: TheRedneck

Good morning Emin just called and asked me to contact you with something very interesting. The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father. This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump - helped along by Aras and Emin. What do you think is the best way to handle this information and would you be able to speak to Emin about it directly? I can also send this info to your father via Rhona, but it is ultra sensitive so wanted to send to you first. Best Rob Goldstone

A) There is evidence of collusion.. hell it literally spells out “Russian government “ repeatedly and the whole rest of the collusion narrative exactly..

B) evidence that someone gave him stolen records?!!!!

So your telling me a lawyer didn’t check the legality of leaking these records?!?!


Lol.. the investigation is to prosecute the person who stole the documents.. not Avenatti.. not that every left wing person on the planet wouldn’t trade avanetti for trump al day long..

a reply to: Grambler

Trump broke laws lol..

I still don’t see how you even remotely see a win here..

I guarantee you avanetti made sure it was legal or he would have leaked the records anonymously..

He didn’t need to sign his name to it.. if he could be charged or debarred. He does it anonymously..


You are literally making the argument that it doesn’t matter if trump committed crimes, because other people did too..


.

a reply to: Sillyolme

And pay for play is only legal if you report it... something Cohen absolutely did not do.

Which is ridiculous.... it should never be legal, but it is..

a reply to: Phage

My mistake..


I skimmed your op history and saw a bunch of titles that could have been from newsmax, but didn’t read them to see what point you were making..


Nor did I look at the dates of how rarely you make an op.