We Should Have Some Theory By Now

a reply to: TrueBrit

The problem is science is forced to make business just as much, These studies science makes are paid for by a company.
In Germany that's the law. No kidding.
That's that, with regards to much of the independence of science.

a reply to: standingwave

The theory may confirm some mythical and or religious information that some of the population are not paranormally prepared to accept.

a reply to: Ophiuchus 13

How does one " paranormally accept" something?

a reply to: dug88

I dont have a "conclusive" theory, but maybe a loosely held together one. It does go down the path of demonic entities. I see no good coming from what they are doing. This is subject to change though. I will however tell you everything I have experienced with these things. You can have all the info and put together your own ideas about what is going on.

These strange lights in the sky, the ones that imitate stars and other ember-orb types were really active about the time of my brothers death which before he died in a auto accident told me all sorts of things that made me think he was crazy. Now I just think he may have been abducted or had some sort of visions. But I no longer think he was crazy, but maybe didnt understand all he was trying to tell me.

a reply to: Ophiuchus 13

So far I have leaned in this direction, but this is why I would like to have all the data from those who I think legit, like Phillips and Valle, if they can not form an opinion, I would like to be free to do so. And others should also have the same opportunity.

a reply to: ultimafule

Yes, they are buried on youtube. Used to not be so bad, but now it is really hard to find the real stuff, you have to search key words.

Here is one that is legit, this is what the ones I have seen look like, and I have seen them come down out of the sky into a field.

www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: Harpua

originally posted by: standingwave
There have been some really good opportunities for the best minds out there to come up with something on this UFO stuff. Locations like Skinwalker, Marley Woods, Hessdalen. These are re-occuring where test equipment has been set up and video has been taken for years. Some of the biggest names have been to all three from what I read. How much more data is needed to start putting together some sort of theory as to why they are here and acting in this manner?

Is the activity really just that random and meaningless that no one can get a grip on some kind of theory? So far all I have read is these entities are some sort of "tricksters". What does that mean? There has to be more to it.

Maybe they don't share the info because its embarrassing to admit that they don't have any.

If you think that these places have been monitored for years, and there is no data out there. you are crazy.

originally posted by: Atsbhct
a reply to: standingwave

You can't have a solid theory on something there's no hard evidence on. You can't posit why someone is here is there's no real contact with them to document.

Its not hard to find UFO investigations like Broadhaven where the UK govt gets a quick cover story and then privately conducts their own investigation. Its just the way govt operates, ala the the missing UFO evidence thread

A notable exception being the Belgium case where the govt operated in a more transparent way. Personally I think the way it took off from La Calamine precludes a terrestrial origin, but whatever you believe about the case, nearly 30 years later, we still dont have an official explanation for this mass sighting.

If you cant get an answer to mass sightings like Belgium or Hudson Valley, what hope is there for other sightings of lesser evidence? Maybe there is a military explanation, but we will never really know.

I like the suggestion that anybody in authority who knows "the truth" about real UFOs and other paranormal activity is terrified of it and sees keeping it from the rest of society as necessary for maintaining what little organization and sanity we have in this existence. It's something so horrifying that most people when they hear it will know it to be true and what's left of their lives will be filled with either blind refusal to acknowledge it, or utter despair.

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Ophiuchus 13

How does one " paranormally accept" something?

Belief in the spirit world and faith.

originally posted by: standingwave
a reply to: ultimafule

Yes, they are buried on youtube. Used to not be so bad, but now it is really hard to find the real stuff, you have to search key words.

Here is one that is legit, this is what the ones I have seen look like, and I have seen them come down out of the sky into a field.

www.youtube.com...

Legit footage of astronomical scintillation, so that person was likely filming a star.

Here's a long exposure of Sirius (known for it's twinkle) which I made (some years back):


Compare to a frame from the youtube vid you posted the link to:


I could get footage like that if I wanted to. What's so special about it?

a reply to: standingwave


There is a working theory out there about this. I'll quote from another thread:

So there's this theory floating around, and it's been getting steam in the world of physics, it's called "Quantum Cavitation". In a nut shell, "Quantum Cavitation" (or "QC" ) might occur when two sets of reality collapse together crushing a middle reality through a process called "vacuum Collapse". End results is a new reality created from the two outer realities, but the cavitation bubbles of the middle reality still can exist as pockets of reality floating around freely in the new reality. Now here's the brain scratcher (i.e. the so-called "Mandela Effect") the pockets of "QC" would have a different set of physics, and could interact with the new reality without affecting objects in the new reality. We may have had a vacuum collapse without knowing it even happened, since we would never have known that anything happened, but the bubbles of "QC" could be floating in and out of us and the only thing that we would have as proof (currently) is these flawed memories, paranormal activities, and weird things of the unexplainable (ie Skin Walker Ranch type places).

It would appear that some geological environments are able to slow down these bubbles, but as of current I don't know if any further research is being funded in "QC".

originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Ophiuchus 13

How does one " paranormally accept" something?

Belief in the spirit world and faith.

Belief and faith...we are parsing words, here.
I prefer the word "knowledge."
I know this realm to exist.
What exactly it is, I deal with an open mind.
Some seems to be good, some seems to be not good.
I am just a man.

a reply to: skunkape23

I guess to simplify, a more spiritual belief will help account for and understand some of the metaphysical with potential to manifest in the physical realm CREATOR Creations.
A faith that SOME religious information may be objective truth further helps to tune the consciousness of our perceived reality and who is part of it.

originally posted by: FireballStorm

originally posted by: standingwave
a reply to: ultimafule

Yes, they are buried on youtube. Used to not be so bad, but now it is really hard to find the real stuff, you have to search key words.

Here is one that is legit, this is what the ones I have seen look like, and I have seen them come down out of the sky into a field.

www.youtube.com...

Legit footage of astronomical scintillation, so that person was likely filming a star.

Here's a long exposure of Sirius (known for it's twinkle) which I made (some years back):

Compare to a frame from the youtube vid you posted the link to:

I could get footage like that if I wanted to. What's so special about it?

What is special about it is I have first hand experience with the same thing. Fake stars. The colors are the same. Another give away is they do not track the same as the rest of the stars. The ones I was dealing with not only would turn deep red, they would come down and cruise along the treeline.

Im not eager to write people off who have taken the time to video these things, as Im sure we all know that stars do scintillate, but the fake ones have a more pronounced color change, more like a strobe or blinking action. Throw in differing movement from the rest of the stars and you have yourself a fake star, or "pseudo-star" as Harley Rutledge might have said.

a reply to: Guyfriday

I was about to make a post along these lines, and that is, besides from the flat out freaky things documented,unexplainable lights flying around, cattle mutilations, horses exploding, dogs turning to piles of goo, I postulate that these things , whatever they are can also affect the outcome of events in peoples lives, able to traverse the timeline, or manipulate events on the fly.

interdimensional beings behaving like clowns
thats all

Posting Hindu Bhagwans (holy chants) on Facebook.


Oh, here come the Christian fundamentalists or Islamists.

Hindu gods are not real, or they must be demons.

Really?
How do you know?

Because I'm the Easter bunny and I haven't seen them at our holiday mascot retreat lately!

Knowledge is depended on context.

We really got not theories about aliens?

Last I saw there was a whole television series on it.

Indeed the coming problem will not be only aliens, but what we've been taught to think about them.

For example is there a difference between "alien" and "extra-terrestrial"?

a reply to: standingwave

"QC" theory would state that that the multiple events of weirdness, is just random events that occur in an isolated area. Think of a rainstorm where the rain comes in waves, while one person is getting hit with a downpour, the other person moved to a shelter and avoids the rain.


These bubbles are just floating around in multiple realities at the same time, and randomly interacts with our reality, we get weirdness. Imagine if the laws of physics stops working for a small amount of time in your house. Would your house be haunted, cured, or just effected by this "QC"?



My concern about this, is that if "QC" becomes the standard model, then what will become of the worlds religions? The very possibility that these Gods could very well be creatures from one of these interfering realities. All very strange.


On topic though, "QC" could easily explain all of the weirdness that happens at the Ranch. It will be excited to see what comes out of this "QC" theory (even though it may cause some issues in classical religion).