US President Hits Porn Actress with $20 million Lawsuit

They stupidly thought $100k was gonna be enough. They never expected she'd come up with enough (and then some) to cover violating the NDA. The $20mil is an act of desperation.

As far as I can tell it's the lawyer wanting money not trump

originally posted by: jordan77
They stupidly thought $100k was gonna be enough. They never expected she'd come up with enough (and then some) to cover violating the NDA. The $20mil is an act of desperation.

All that money Democrats are pouring directly into Trump’s pocket and STILL Stormy is bound by the agreement.

I think it’s a pretty genius way to raise money from ‘the opposition.’

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: jordan77
They stupidly thought $100k was gonna be enough. They never expected she'd come up with enough (and then some) to cover violating the NDA. The $20mil is an act of desperation.

All that money Democrats are pouring directly into Trump’s pocket and STILL Stormy is bound by the agreement.

I think it’s a pretty genius way to raise money from ‘the opposition.’

How much money has Trump received from Stormy? Oh none?

So sue her. The discovery phase will be fun to watch! Trump deposed under oath again? Pretty risky.

originally posted by: DogStarIn1066

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: jordan77
They stupidly thought $100k was gonna be enough. They never expected she'd come up with enough (and then some) to cover violating the NDA. The $20mil is an act of desperation.

All that money Democrats are pouring directly into Trump’s pocket and STILL Stormy is bound by the agreement.

I think it’s a pretty genius way to raise money from ‘the opposition.’

How much money has Trump received from Stormy? Oh none?

So sue her. The discovery phase will be fun to watch! Trump deposed under oath again? Pretty risky.

Suing her is the topic of the thread.

It will have to go to arbitration per the terms of the NDA, before it ever goes to court.

You really should actually READ THE AGREEMENT. The terms are very specific including how disputes are handled.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: DogStarIn1066

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: jordan77
They stupidly thought $100k was gonna be enough. They never expected she'd come up with enough (and then some) to cover violating the NDA. The $20mil is an act of desperation.

All that money Democrats are pouring directly into Trump’s pocket and STILL Stormy is bound by the agreement.

I think it’s a pretty genius way to raise money from ‘the opposition.’

How much money has Trump received from Stormy? Oh none?

So sue her. The discovery phase will be fun to watch! Trump deposed under oath again? Pretty risky.

Suing her is the topic of the thread.

It will have to go to arbitration per the terms of the NDA, before it ever goes to court.

You really should actually READ THE AGREEMENT. The terms are very specific including how disputes are handled.

The ND A is invalid, most likely, so the terms are invalid. If Trump feels it is valid the remedy is the court this a suit. Discovery, depositions, all that stuff.

Should be fun.

a reply to: DogStarIn1066

Then anyone can declare an NDA invalid to avoid arbitration. All it requires is my say so!

originally posted by: badw0lf
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Where has it been stated that he admits to this affair.

Even SHE has denied it, but now wants to take it further.

Why is everyone missing the vital aspects in favour of the media narrative?

Because All People Love a Sexual Fantasy . Horny Lil Bastids can't Help but be Moved by a Good Erotic What If.......

a reply to: Soloprotocol

just being polite:

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: DogStarIn1066

Then anyone can declare an NDA invalid to avoid arbitration. All it requires is my say so!

If one party feels that the other party is violating a contract the only remedy is the courts. In a contract a judge can enforce the terms of the contract. Or, a party can seek the courts to render a judgement on all or parts of a contract. Happens all the time.

The courts decide when the parties cannot agree on what the contract means, or if it is even a legal, valid contract.

I suspect that Stormy's law team found an error in the contract that makes it null, and nonbinding.

The courts will decide, unless there is an out of court settlement.

Simple.

a reply to: Sillyolme

the man is powerful he paid for it up front he's no Harvey Weinstein or bill Clinton using his power to get what he wants he needed to get rid of his dirty water and this is before he became a politician the Dems have got a history of this sort of thing recent the Kennedy bros Clinton so give it over he's just bloke

originally posted by: DogStarIn1066

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: jordan77
They stupidly thought $100k was gonna be enough. They never expected she'd come up with enough (and then some) to cover violating the NDA. The $20mil is an act of desperation.

All that money Democrats are pouring directly into Trump’s pocket and STILL Stormy is bound by the agreement.

I think it’s a pretty genius way to raise money from ‘the opposition.’

How much money has Trump received from Stormy? Oh none?

So sue her. The discovery phase will be fun to watch! Trump deposed under oath again? Pretty risky.

Trump or his organization is not involved in the law suit. The lawyer is suing her per their agreement. And he claims he can show 20 violations of the agreement meaning she owes 1 million per incident. Trump won't be interviewed there will be no discovery involving Trump.

This lawyer at the time worked for Trump entertainment and has investments in the company his argument will be that he was protecting the Trump brand to protect his investments.

I however don't believe him and think he told Trump but proving that would be difficult if not impossible.

US President Hits Porn Actress with $20 million Lawsuit

Hellova facial.

a reply to: dragonridr

If she is in violation of the agreement she must be telling the truth. Let's put Trump under oath to see what's what.

originally posted by: DogStarIn1066

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: DogStarIn1066

Then anyone can declare an NDA invalid to avoid arbitration. All it requires is my say so!

If one party feels that the other party is violating a contract the only remedy is the courts. In a contract a judge can enforce the terms of the contract. Or, a party can seek the courts to render a judgement on all or parts of a contract. Happens all the time.

The courts decide when the parties cannot agree on what the contract means, or if it is even a legal, valid contract.

I suspect that Stormy's law team found an error in the contract that makes it null, and nonbinding.

The courts will decide, unless there is an out of court settlement.

Simple.

Doubtful.

And when all is said and done it will go to the supreme years from now after appeals. With Trump likely to replace several more supremes, do you honestly expect this to go against him?

Holy crap! You guys are complicating the crap outta this situation. This is a pretty cut-and-dry contract law situation. The NDA is either valid or not. If it is, Stormy gets sued to death. If it's not she can sing like a canary without fear. The parties entered into this NDA using pseudonyms. Those pseudonyms are filed with the Court in order to identify --- to the Court --- the actual parties to the agreement. The claim being made is that the NDA is not enforceable because it was never duly executed. Trump's side never signed the NDA. It's either executed or it's not. The rules are very clear on this.

originally posted by: jtma508
Holy crap! You guys are complicating the crap outta this situation. This is a pretty cut-and-dry contract law situation. The NDA is either valid or not. If it is, Stormy gets sued to death. If it's not she can sing like a canary without fear. The parties entered into this NDA using pseudonyms. Those pseudonyms are filed with the Court in order to identify --- to the Court --- the actual parties to the agreement. The claim being made is that the NDA is not enforceable because it was never duly executed. Trump's side never signed the NDA. It's either executed or it's not. The rules are very clear on this.

Plus she's offered to pay back the amount, pretty much implying that the NDA is valid. Why would you payback something in order to talk if the agreement wasn't binding in the first place?

If she were smart, she just would have asked for more money........

I have a funny feeling we're about to get an earful of the kind of information that'll cause Donnie to have an aneurysm.

I (and the rest of American public) can't wait!

originally posted by: jtma508
The parties entered into this NDA using pseudonyms. Those pseudonyms are filed with the Court in order to identify --- to the Court --- the actual parties to the agreement.

Stormy may have filed a Complaint saying that 'DD' is 'Donald Trump' and that she is 'PP,' but she has no way to actually prove that. Trump didn't sign the 'Side Letter' and it required his signature and delivery to Stormy's attorney -- so it's invalid...worthless.

HOWEVER, the NDA, itself, cannot be assumed to be invalid just because it lacks a signature. The terms did not require Stormy or her lawyer to be provided with a copy signed by Trump/DD.

Here's my take on the NDA and 'Side Letter' if you are interested: Link

originally posted by: Wayfarer
I have a funny feeling we're about to get an earful of the kind of information that'll cause Donnie to have an aneurysm.

I (and the rest of American public) can't wait!

The NDA is so iron clad, thorough, and specific...there's no way Stormy can wiggle out of it.

In fact, the agreement suggests that Stormy will have to turn over all the donations to her legal fund(s) to 'David Dennison,' eventually.

Anyone donating to Stormy's legal fund is effectively donating money to 'David Dennison.'

I think Trump is probably enjoying this very, very much.