Originally posted by Realist05
Not a miracle shot; a doable 3 shot sequence as demonstrated by Hal Sawyer and the house assassinations committee in the 70's.
Sometimes the easiest explanation is the most difficult to accept.
-=scaratches chin-=......then why did the house assinatiosn committe rule it was most likley a conspiracy?....forgot to mention that? and can they
explain away these discrepencies...
-the 51 eye witnesses of a shooter on the grassy knoll
-the fact that oswald being in the spot where he had to be to kill the president coudn't have happened due to eye witness accounts who saw him in the
break room right before the assination (and i mean right before)
-the fact that oswald was on some mission to teh USSR and was working for some intellegence agency, or the army on a spy mission prior to the
assination
-the physics of the kill shot coming from the front, therefore causing kennedys head to go back and to the left
-jack ruby had knew oswald before he killed him....the fact that ruby killed oswald is enough to turn some heads....
-ruby said he would talk is he was moved to washing d.c. to talk...but they ignored him and he died in prison...
-oswald claimed he was a patsy
-oswlad was a lousy shot
-the lack of fingerprints on the gun.
-the rifle found in the book depository was a piece of junk with a crooked site
-oswald was not even told he was charged with killing kennedy, just with killing a cop
-eye wittnesses to this cop killing claim to have seen two men
-a recorded conversation 18 days prior to the assination in miami, fl about how the presidents killing was "in the working"..(and no, it wasn't
oswald who said it)
-the horrific lack of protection at dealy plaza that day
-suppression of information disagreeing with the warren commision and the single bullet theory
-military interfernece with the autopsy....and the government illegally moving the body from texas to washington d.c.
.....proabably not