Officials warn against sharing disturbing video circulating on Facebook

Way to go Facebook. But my account can be disabled instantly by an algorithm if I share the wrong meme.

a reply to: ketsuko

I went on one of my usual lads kinda sites videos pics etc of stupid lad stuff all pretty tame tbh but today I watched a crash in Russia caught on a cam and it as I watched it I saw legs and I think a head fly about followed by another bike hitting the car filming without a doubt I just watched two people die violent deaths and this site didn't warn about the content It just described it as an action movie crash.
It will probably be the last thing I think about before sleep .

a reply to: StallionDuck

So a child porn peddler made the video and tricked people into spreading it on FB?

Or was it started by law enforcement?

Only a child porn peddler OR law enforcement would have that footage.

originally posted by: StallionDuck
a reply to: AMPTAH

The problem with this is... What's to say that pedo's are so screwed up that they will not only want to watch this "fake pedo porn" but will want to know what it feels like? Much like a serial killer gets off on killing it's victims in various ways.

Because we distinguish between "fantasy" and "real activity" in our society.

The same arguments can be made concerning all the violent movies Hollywood makes.

How many men run around like Rambo shooting up the place?

The humans watch the movie, and it "satisfies" their urges, so they don't need to experience these things in the "reality".

Fantasy substitutes for reality, and consumes the desire, so that the reality never occurs.

Of course, other people point to all the mass shootings, and suggest these ideas came from hollywood.

So, there's material there to debate.

a reply to: StallionDuck

No, its a terrible way to die reserved only for the most cursed.

The only noble way out of that method of death is not to cry aloud and just accept the pain. If you cry aloud you are rejected from the Halls of Valhalla.

I guess it would be alright if you are a Clinton.
a reply to: StallionDuck

originally posted by: StallionDuck

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: StallionDuck

"Rapist and Pedophiles should be tossed in an arena as their victims pummel them with spears, bullets and the like, from above! "

So you believe in cruel and unusual punishment. How about disembowelment ? The English were masters of this kind of punishment.

Absolutely! Depending on the crime, of course.

If a person has no moral compass, willingly doing such things to a child.... I would be happy to draw up some designs that would make the creators or SAW envious.


Kill someone in cold blood... Death Penalty
Rape... Castration via the victim

Harming a child... Cruel and unusual punishment! The more horrific the better.

How about a video posting to Facebook of that pedophile, tied to a tree in the wilderness, gets his junk cut off, no anesthesia.... the camera shifts away from his screaming and writhing form to a pair of boots, walking away.

a reply to: dfnj2015

ok . castration and life in prison or a visit with Dr K

a reply to: StallionDuck

So when is Facebook being charged? I'll wait for the answer.

originally posted by: Ksihkehe
a reply to: StallionDuck

So when is Facebook being charged? I'll wait for the answer.

Facebook is a division of the NSA.

They collect information on people and all their contacts and connections.

They can never charge the NSA.

Sharing such nonsense is a overt way of normalizing such sickness throughout all of the world society; the raise awareness business is an excuse of distribution of that sickness... best to unfriend and distance oneself from those using such excuses for the distribution of such materials.

Those that self justify wrong using excuses are not the sort to keep as a friend anyway.

a reply to: ArMaP

They certainly have tools in place to not only find copies of image/moving image but slightly altered versions. Don´t forget, they bought face.com six years ago, I suppose facebook has one of the most powerful face and probably object recognition software after governmental intelligence agencies.

Think of it, on a website where nearly all content is generated by users, you are bound to have a powerful toolbox when it comes to stuff like removing, tracing and tagging stuff.

originally posted by: Ksihkehe
a reply to: StallionDuck

So when is Facebook being charged? I'll wait for the answer.

I'd like to know this as well. They apparently have this and from what I understand, many others along with google, on their hard drives... They should be held to the same standards. That'll clear up the issue really fast.

Same with ISPs. Though, then there are the privacy issues and all that. That's a discussion in itself with some very hard choices to make. Still.... For the sake of protecting children (and yes this is how it starts.... NSA crap), rock and a hard place... I have no answers

a reply to: StallionDuck

My one and only thought, why the hell are FB not removing the video, everytime it emerges, they make so god dam much money but just like you tube, they state "we are not responsible for the content" or "there is just to much content to filter"

BS, greed and greed alone let videos like this remain on their platforms

originally posted by: ArMaP

originally posted by: AMPTAH
Is it still illegal to watch the fake porn, or to have fake porn in your posession?

If it shows what looks like children, yes.

Shouldn't it be necessary to have a "victim" for everything defined as a "crime".

From my understanding, in cases like this they are considered potential victims, like when someone says it's OK to kill someone. They didn't do it but they are promoting the idea.

I wonder why they allow MAMBALA with their literature and clear goals.

a reply to: SeaWorthy

What's a MAMBALA?

I wonder if this video is at all related to John Podesta; he thinks he's hot sh!7.

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: SeaWorthy

What's a MAMBALA?

Sure you guessed I spelled it wrong
North American Man-Boy Love Association

I'm pretty sure they could easily trace the original uploader, and law enforcement would question him from there.

I would actually be disgusted if that hadn't happened already.

I am also suspicious that Facebook has software that can make it so certain phrases do not post, yet can't do the same for the code string for a video? Hmm...

originally posted by: SeaWorthy
Sure you guessed I spelled it wrong

I didn't, that's why I asked.