It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ausername
First annual fake news awards
Could be yuuge!
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: underwerks
Actually I thoroughly researched and posted about the indictments when the first popped up.
Feel free to find the thread and read. You are not comparing the same things with what you posted and your link.
Please, show me evidence. I haven't seen anything verifiable in any thread or "news" story about it. Only anonymous sources.
Thanks.
I made a thread on it and even linked to the US Govt doc citing the number of sealed cases in a particular year and how unusual it was for even the first 12 to be in DC alone.
It will come up in a search I'm sure. I don't have time to rehash it all again.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: dug88
My thoughts exactly. I wonder what kind of legal recourse will taken if the outlets that "win" see their numbers drop following this circus.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: underwerks
Actually I thoroughly researched and posted about the indictments when the first popped up.
Feel free to find the thread and read. You are not comparing the same things with what you posted and your link.
Please, show me evidence. I haven't seen anything verifiable in any thread or "news" story about it. Only anonymous sources.
Thanks.
I made a thread on it and even linked to the US Govt doc citing the number of sealed cases in a particular year and how unusual it was for even the first 12 to be in DC alone.
It will come up in a search I'm sure. I don't have time to rehash it all again.
I went back to last May on your OP's and this is the only one I found:
12 Sealed Indictments now
Read the first few pages and the last few, and it seems by the posters responses you haven't provided any evidence of what you're saying at all. If I'm wrong, please point me to the section where you lay out the evidence.
The last pages are people asking where the evidence is, with barely any response.
ETA: I really want to know. If there really is damning evidence this is happening it can only help you to rehash it here.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: dug88
Partially my reasoning for my theory.
But either way they aren't telling anyone who to believe...they are pointing out false news accounts. I'd say that's the duty of the news organizations but they obviously don't do that.
originally posted by: 0zzymand0s
a reply to: YouSir
I don't know from all but will grant "mostly."
I think the original tweet was a joke/attempt at humor and a way to poke at his political/media enemies.
I think it got a lot of traction and he decided to go ahead and actually do it.
I don't believe there was much thought behind it in the first place, however.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: underwerks
Actually I thoroughly researched and posted about the indictments when the first popped up.
Feel free to find the thread and read. You are not comparing the same things with what you posted and your link.
Please, show me evidence. I haven't seen anything verifiable in any thread or "news" story about it. Only anonymous sources.
Thanks.
I made a thread on it and even linked to the US Govt doc citing the number of sealed cases in a particular year and how unusual it was for even the first 12 to be in DC alone.
It will come up in a search I'm sure. I don't have time to rehash it all again.
I went back to last May on your OP's and this is the only one I found:
12 Sealed Indictments now
Read the first few pages and the last few, and it seems by the posters responses you haven't provided any evidence of what you're saying at all. If I'm wrong, please point me to the section where you lay out the evidence.
The last pages are people asking where the evidence is, with barely any response.
ETA: I really want to know. If there really is damning evidence this is happening it can only help you to rehash it here.
You read the first few and last few pages in 8 minutes? Did you go through any links? Did you find the govt doc I linked to? Do you know what PACER is?
It's a 41 page thread. Feel free to read through it....I don't plan to rehash here.
originally posted by: dug88
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: dug88
Partially my reasoning for my theory.
But either way they aren't telling anyone who to believe...they are pointing out false news accounts. I'd say that's the duty of the news organizations but they obviously don't do that.
By calling it false they are implying there is certain news that should and shouldn't be listened to. This isn't just anybody saying this, this is the leader of a government. The government is deciding what's real and what's fake. Sounds like some good old fashioned Soviet or Nazi style propaganda to me. Especially wrapping it up in a nice easily digestible, memorable 'award show' for the masses.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: underwerks
Actually I thoroughly researched and posted about the indictments when the first popped up.
Feel free to find the thread and read. You are not comparing the same things with what you posted and your link.
Please, show me evidence. I haven't seen anything verifiable in any thread or "news" story about it. Only anonymous sources.
Thanks.
I made a thread on it and even linked to the US Govt doc citing the number of sealed cases in a particular year and how unusual it was for even the first 12 to be in DC alone.
It will come up in a search I'm sure. I don't have time to rehash it all again.
I went back to last May on your OP's and this is the only one I found:
12 Sealed Indictments now
Read the first few pages and the last few, and it seems by the posters responses you haven't provided any evidence of what you're saying at all. If I'm wrong, please point me to the section where you lay out the evidence.
The last pages are people asking where the evidence is, with barely any response.
ETA: I really want to know. If there really is damning evidence this is happening it can only help you to rehash it here.
You read the first few and last few pages in 8 minutes? Did you go through any links? Did you find the govt doc I linked to? Do you know what PACER is?
It's a 41 page thread. Feel free to read through it....I don't plan to rehash here.
Actually it was a little less than 8 minutes.
I'm not going to spend time reading 40+ pages to find the nugget of truth you're claiming is in there, if you can't even seem to find it. It's your thread, you know where it is better than I do.
Why is it so hard to just link to the information proving you correct?
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Since folks keep wondering and pointing to whatever experts in law, here is the paper I pulled my numbers from.
This is a Federal Judicial Center study with numbers from 2006. Yes thats a few years back, but it should be pretty representative of the number of sealed indictments that happen in Federal court today.
Federal Study
Page 17 is the one to look at.
Out of 66,458 cases total in ALL Federal Courts, there were only 284 sealed indictments. This is coming from the actual source, not someone with any agenda or speaking without knowledge.
originally posted by: The GUT
Hope porn is even better than doom porn. Who woulda thunk? I'm being serious here. I'm hoping!
HOUSE SS&T SBCMT HTG ON COMMERCIAL CREW, Jan 17, 2018, DC, 10:00 am ET
The Space Subcommittee of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee will hold a hearing on January 17, 2018 at 10:00 am ET in 2318 Rayburn House Office Building on “An Update on NASA Commercial Crew Systems Development.”
David Wilcock New Article 12-25-17, Section II… “Mega Anon excerpts”
MA: I know you have talked about some of the more outrageous disclosure stuff. There are plans in place to force this sort of thing to the surface.
One example would be a Mars mission. NASA will come out and say it will cost this much. Trump will counter and force them to do it for less.
Then they will have to explain why the sciences and tech they lied to everybody about will have to be utilized in order to make it happen at that price.
NASA is going to implode on itself, just like the Air Force and contractors like Lockheed. It’s also like the DNC investigating themselves.
NASA will end up doing their own disclosure.
First we will have to prove that the earth is not what we think it is. Elon Musk is very involved in this, and has been in contact with top people.
Some of this involves Trump’s uncle. There is a lot more to that backstory.
Trump is going to say “Look how long they have been lying to you.”
They are going to try to say “We just found out about this.” They are trying to drive the media narrative.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: dug88
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: dug88
Partially my reasoning for my theory.
But either way they aren't telling anyone who to believe...they are pointing out false news accounts. I'd say that's the duty of the news organizations but they obviously don't do that.
By calling it false they are implying there is certain news that should and shouldn't be listened to. This isn't just anybody saying this, this is the leader of a government. The government is deciding what's real and what's fake. Sounds like some good old fashioned Soviet or Nazi style propaganda to me. Especially wrapping it up in a nice easily digestible, memorable 'award show' for the masses.
Trumps been around for a year. Are you suggesting he has more sway than MSM has had in the last 100 years.
Trouble is you have to have someone that has a large bullhorn to get a message across when you aren't holding your own people accountable for stories that may carry more than just the actual news.
This isn't anyone saying dontbwatch it or you can't watch it...it is someone calling out which ones report the facts without political motivation or agenda.....personally I believe it is a needed action as it appears most of the populace these days are prone to just regurgitating what they hear versus actually digging to see if true.
originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Vasa Croe
So there were only 241 sealed indictments in 2006.
12 years ago.
That's hardly an indication of how many there are today, especially with the current opiate and drug problem that wasn't ravaging the nation back in 2006. Sealed criminal indictments could be for anyone, for any crime. So that doesn't really mean anything.
I don't think the evidence I was looking for exists. Everyone constantly talks like there's obvious evidence that Trump is draining the swmap through these 10,000 indictments, but it isn't there. Reading further, I see now that this is just a right wing hope and dream, and as such, I won't clog up you're thread asking for evidence that doesn't exist.
originally posted by: elementalgrove
originally posted by: The GUT
Hope porn is even better than doom porn. Who woulda thunk? I'm being serious here. I'm hoping!
HOPE PORN!!!
LOL that is freaking classic!
I am taking that my friend, what a perfect way to sum up Q/MegaAnon and the white hats fighting the darkness!!
All up in Hope Porn right now!!
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Vasa Croe
So there were only 241 sealed indictments in 2006.
12 years ago.
That's hardly an indication of how many there are today, especially with the current opiate and drug problem that wasn't ravaging the nation back in 2006. Sealed criminal indictments could be for anyone, for any crime. So that doesn't really mean anything.
I don't think the evidence I was looking for exists. Everyone constantly talks like there's obvious evidence that Trump is draining the swmap through these 10,000 indictments, but it isn't there. Reading further, I see now that this is just a right wing hope and dream, and as such, I won't clog up you're thread asking for evidence that doesn't exist.
Didn't figure you'd take the time. Like I said...Not real concerned with rehashing something with someone that doesn't have time to read for themselves.
originally posted by: YouSir
originally posted by: smurfy
Attempted brainwashing, Trump is farrrrrr....from being the arbiter of, 'real news' so anything he has to say about fake news is far less a poke, more of a joke.
Ummm...C'mon little blue dude...you need to get with the program...
Trump tweets are...all...about humor...
This past almost two years has been hilarious...It's been one long reality show episode...
But the joke...and...punchline has been the left of the spectrum...
Take a step back and laugh...it's the best medicine for whatever it is that ails you...
YouSir