Warren Agrees 2016 Democratic Primary Was Rigged For Clinton

A little late to the party (no pun intended), Elizabeth...especially considering you enthusiastically endorsed the woman responsible for usurping and corrupting the DNC...and rigging the Democrat Primary.

Still, it's interesting to note that Ms. Warren is now validating what candidate Trump knew so long ago.



Better late than never, Elizabeth...but just in time to join the flock, as it now proceeds to toss crooked old Hillary under the party bus.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said Thursday she believes the 2016 Democratic presidential primary was rigged for Hillary Clinton.

When asked by CNN’s Jake Tapper if she believed the Democratic primary was rigged in favor of Clinton, Warren replied with a simple “Yes.”

thehill.com...

a reply to: IAMTAT

Most people knew about the rigged primary (even those on the left), the DNC wouldn't admit it though due to corruption and glorification of train wreck Hillary. Even false progressives like Warren couldn't grow a backbone until Hillary was a liability.

a reply to: IAMTAT

And yet if offered the VP slot by Clinton, she would have gladly accepted. Spare me your faux outrage, Lizzy.

Go Greyhound and leave the driving to us !!

a reply to: IAMTAT

It sure does seem like there is something negative on the horizon for Hillary.

a reply to: IAMTAT

That's because Warren plans on running in 2020.

The fact that she, Brazille and others are throwing Hillary under the bus speaks to future indictments with Hillary and/or The Podesta Group.


I honestly believe that Warren and everyone else involved with the DNC knew about the corruption so no matter what they say, the skid mark of corruption will never leave their tighty-whiteys.


The DNC has Herpes and everyone involved is infected.


And Warren is asking for a kiss.

Her public under the bus throwing is the beginning of the rats deserting the sinking ship known as the DNC. If the old guard (Pelosi, Schumer, etc.) don’t get out of the way for the young guard (Booker, the California crazy lady, etc.), Dems won’t hold the majority for many, many, MANY years to come. Which would be a shame, because as an Independent I could see Booker as POTUS. How can you resist a man who rescues dogs from burning houses?

Anyone paying attention and honest with themselves was already aware of this!

ETA: Not a shot at you OP at all, just saying. Good stuff you found.

Clinton corrupts everything she touches.
Corruption is what she is.

What she did to the DNC as a candidate...is what she would've done to the entire country, as President.

Yet, Warren and others were okay with corruption...as long as it was THEIR corruption.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Hillary won't go away. She keeps inserting herself into everything. Essentially keeping the dems from moving on from the whole 2016 debacle and finding a new leader. So it seems that whoever is pulling the strings has given the go ahead to hit her with that bus.

She had her chance, basically handed everything on a silver platter and still couldn't win.

a reply to: FauxMulder

Clintons don't go quietly into the night.
She'll take scalps with her (Warren pun intended).

a reply to: IAMTAT

The DNC admitted in court that they do not elect their nominees democratically.

If this teaches the citizens anything it should teach them that we need to get rid of the DNC and the RNC. The powers behind the elected. If we do not get rid of the DNC and the RNC, a new group must form. The PNC. The Peoples National Committee. I think there are more people who can agree with each other in this country than the contrary.

Now we can all agree that Hillary leaves a trail of slime where ever she goes and no one in the DNC is untainted by the stench of corruption, but I have to say that nothing will ever happen.

The establishment republicans are just as bad and probably knew most, if not all, of what was going on.

Hell, if us small unwashed peons can figure it out, then anyone can.

Yet they do nothing.

it would explain why hillary spent billion dollars.... dnc was broke, her charge in 2015, donations rolled in.. she had full control.. sanders was screwed and hillary had to pay for the dossier

a reply to: IAMTAT

That's bad for the dems but good for everyone else.

I disagree that most people knew.

I have several older female friends who are die hard Clinton supporters. They only believe what Rachel maddow tells them. Rachel Maddow is as establishment as they come. she ain't going against Clinton.

Now that this has come out, they'll have to accept the truth.

a reply to: IAMTAT


Democrats knew everything but let it go because they thought Hillary will win
the elections.

originally posted by: Trueman
a reply to: IAMTAT


Democrats knew everything but let it go because they thought Hillary will win
the elections.

So, thanks to Hillary, they were not only accomplices,...but fools.

a reply to: IAMTAT

From the Squaw's own lips.


Notice how she talks about moving on from this? Nothing about the illegal or criminal aspect, or punishing anyone?

As others have said, she knew.

They are all afraid where this will go.

Most of us on here and other places have been saying this for a year.