It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RadioRobert
Gryph, if it's really well-known and established, there'd certainly be no need to make deals for information.
I'm not saying nothing will come up pointing to Trump by any means, but this sort of willful blindness about the Podesta Group coupled with a certainty of wrong-doing by Trump is certainly curious based on the information available to us so-far.
... it will be because of diminishing physical and mental capacity.
originally posted by: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
a reply to: Gryphon66
You are probably right, in that it will be physical or mental diminished state that will get him first. His behavior is hysterical, increasingly erratic, and is starting to worry people in his inner circles. Trials and investigations take months, sometimes years. But given he is proving every day, more and more, just how mentally unstable, vindictive, and childish he is, he is either going to be convinced to resign, or forced to.
originally posted by: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
But in my honest opinion, Trump himself isn't the main target yet. They aren't going directly for him, but working their way, one by one, through his swamp creatures. They aren't just going after Trump, they are sending a message.
originally posted by: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
And this is only round 1 of the indictments. Apparently, there is possible another one sealed and not yet opened, and speculation is rife on which domino gets taken out next. Flynn is the favorite, but Roger Stone has also been tossed around as a possibility. It is also rumored that the second one will be someone higher up the food chain than Manafort. So while Flynn and Stone certainly fit, so does Jeff Sessions, who was also Popadopalous' supervisor in the campaign.
originally posted by: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
I am going wait and see what the next couple days reveal before casting my bets on who is next. Flynn seems the obvious choice, but he already has another case going against him, so i don't know how that would affect Mueller's. But if the next indictment isn't Flynn, I'm gonna take a leap and put my money on Sessions. Sessions seems too high a target to nail at this point in the investigation, but given his connections to Popodopolous, and that fact that Popodopoplus' indictment, plea, and cooperation with the investigation has been a big surprise to many, the possibility of Mueller pulling an even bigger rabbit out of Trump's rabbit hole is not that remote a possibility now.
I will say this investigation has moved faster than I thought. I figured it would be another year before the first indictments came in.
To say the least, this shiz must be red hot.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Erno86
originally posted by: Gryphon66
I have to disagree with the New York Times.
"B-Movie plot line" is far too generous; this ridiculous dumb-show is pure third-rate Reality TV.
May I add...DJT's (most likely) treasonous activity against the United States as well.
"If Trump survives this crisis --- which may mean that American democracy doesn't --- tax cuts will have a lot to do with it."
quote: Paul Krugman - "Trump Won't Bring Joy to Moolaville" - NYT's OP-ED Tuesday, October 31, 2017
www.nytimes.com...
You are much funny poster .
(you were not serious....I hope...maybe ?)
"But Mueller also could be signaling a charge he could pursue in connection with the coordination case --- a conspiracy to defraud the United States by coordinating with Russia.
'Collusion is not a crime, but basically the criminal equivalent is conspiracy,' said former federal prosecutor Randall Eliason. 'You could have a conspiracy to defraud the U.S. by interfering with our election.'
Mueller must also separate efforts that might seem seedy from those that are illegal.
An opposition research firm funded by Clinton's campaign and the DNC tapped a former British spy to dig into Trump's personal and business dealings, and the former spy purportedly solicited information from Russian government officials. That work might similarly be viewed as an unsavory effort to engage with foreign interests to win an election, but it would not necessarily be illegal if there was no conspiracy to defraud anyone, legal analysts said.
'There could be something out there that stinks to high heaven,' Frankel said, 'but it doesn't make it a violation of the law.' "
originally posted by: Erno86
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Erno86
originally posted by: Gryphon66
I have to disagree with the New York Times.
"B-Movie plot line" is far too generous; this ridiculous dumb-show is pure third-rate Reality TV.
May I add...DJT's (most likely) treasonous activity against the United States as well.
"If Trump survives this crisis --- which may mean that American democracy doesn't --- tax cuts will have a lot to do with it."
quote: Paul Krugman - "Trump Won't Bring Joy to Moolaville" - NYT's OP-ED Tuesday, October 31, 2017
www.nytimes.com...
You are much funny poster .
(you were not serious....I hope...maybe ?)
That's right folks..."It's Mueller time" --- I love the smell of impeachment in the morning.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
special council Robert Mueller has reversed Paul Manafort bail deal after he contacted a Russian with ties to Russian intel.
Jesus did trump hire anyone not conceived in a petre dish???
originally posted by: Sillyolme
special council Robert Mueller has reversed Paul Manafort bail deal after he contacted a Russian with ties to Russian intel.
Jesus did trump hire anyone not conceived in a petre dish???