It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WASHINGTON — Animal advocates are keeping close watch on Congress amid concern that a moratorium on horse meat production may be in jeopardy.
Congress shut down the industry nearly a decade ago by cutting off funds for USDA meat inspectors. But in July, a key House committee approved an annual farm spending bill that would lift the ban.
The full House then ratified that shift in policy, for the first time in two years — opening the door to revival of an industry that many Americans find repugnant, but which some horse owners view as a practical way to dispose of unwanted livestock.
President Donald Trump’s proposed budget would raise $10 million by lifting a ban on the sale of wild mustangs. Horse advocates take it as a disturbing sign. If Trump is open to exporting symbols of the Wild West to satisfy culinary cravings in Belgium or France, he’s probably open to resumption of domestic horse meat production.
originally posted by: intrepid
Horse. The other, other red meat.
I don't understand why there was a moratorium to start with. Meat is meat. It's probably tougher but is it tasty?
Horse. The other, other red meat.
I don't understand why there was a moratorium to start with. Meat is meat. It's probably tougher but is it tasty?
I haven't tried it, but those who have claim it is more tender than beef and very good.
I can't bring myself to try. But it is very rare to find it here now. It seems only older people remember eating horsemeat.
I think having war on your soil opens your mind to alternate food sources...??
In any case, I know the closing of the slaughterhouses there was a catastrophy !
originally posted by: KawRider9
a reply to: silo13
Such heart jerking fear mongering.
An abundance/over population of any animal is a very serious health hazard. And using the remains of said animals is a great way to feed your pets/livestock. I see nothing wrong with this.
If you think "you'll" be eating this, you can sleep easy, as you won't. The, "what about the poor animals" scenario doesn't apply here.
originally posted by: silo13
originally posted by: KawRider9
a reply to: silo13
Such heart jerking fear mongering.
An abundance/over population of any animal is a very serious health hazard. And using the remains of said animals is a great way to feed your pets/livestock. I see nothing wrong with this.
If you think "you'll" be eating this, you can sleep easy, as you won't. The, "what about the poor animals" scenario doesn't apply here.
I agree on all points but the last. Maybe you're missing my point.
Opening the slaughterhouses in the USA will save the suffering of (most) unwanted horses. I think it needs to be done.
Trucking them in deplorable conditions for hundreds if not thousands of miles is abuse of the highest form.
peace
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: angeldoll
This is equally as repugnant as eating a dog or cat. imo. No, no, and no.
Why?
originally posted by: intrepid
Horse. The other, other red meat.
I don't understand why there was a moratorium to start with. Meat is meat. It's probably tougher but is it tasty?