So asking for Loyalty and Honesty is a Crime now?

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: UKTruth

Not the same example with Trump as we know he was not under investigation.

Bill Clinton was not under investigation. Mike Flynn is, so....

Nope, Trump (not under investigation) had a conversation with the FBI Director. Normal.

Bill Clinton, wife under investigation, has a meeting with the AG - not normal.

Your comparison was ill thought out.

a reply to: carewemust

And if trump asked him to be loyal to the USA, then no issue....


But going around and asking every single official If they will be loyal to you.. kinda insinuating that means over America..

a reply to: UKTruth

Normal?!?!

Not normal?!?!

What?!?!



So having a meeting with the ag, where we have no idea what was said, for better or worse..

Or trump specifically asking some one investigating his campaign:

If they are loyal to him ..

Then asks him to let this go..

Then fires him over the investigation he "wouldn't let go of."


"Donald Trump has said he was thinking of “this Russia thing” when he decided James Comey’s fate – contradicting the White House rationale that he fired the FBI director for mishandling the Clinton email investigation."


Now what did bill say to lynch that was questionable??

Nothing you can site..

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: carewemust

And if trump asked him to be loyal to the USA, then no issue....


But going around and asking every single official If they will be loyal to you.. kinda insinuating that means over America..

Why would it insinuate it means 'over America'. He is the duly elected representative of the people of America. Loyalty to him means loyalty to the electorate.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Interesting word "insinuation" but then again isn't that what the sensationalized media have been selling to those that wants Trump to be whatever the democrats wants him to be so they can have the public support to take him out of the white house.

Yes, playing with words is easier to manipulate than listening to facts, Democrats in the intelligence panel wants their whole investigation to be nothing words of opinion so they can push their 2018 agenda.

They act like petty children when the people they are interrogating can not give them what they want, as of yesterday interrogations seems to prove.

Pity.

originally posted by: darkbake
........
That sounds like obstruction of justice.

Good luck with that. That's obviously why Comey reported it immediately when it happened. The Left is running out of straws to grasp.

a reply to: DJW001

You say stupid, that's your right. Illegal? Hardly.

originally posted by: pavil
The Left is running out of straws to grasp.

trololololol, keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better. We (the left) literally have to do nothing while we sit back and watch trump bury himself in his own self sabotage. If you think Comey is the only staw left then you are willfully ignoring the other issues.

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: PurpleFox
a reply to: darkbake

Wrong. "Let this go" was referring to the Flynn investigation.

Yeah, I'd say that's pretty much a perfect example of obstruction of justice.

So.. Trump "obstructed justice" and Comey didn't follow the law and report it to his boss. Where does that leave us? hmmm??

I'd say, judging by where we currently are, that pretty much leaves us with one guy that's been fired and one guy that still needs to be fired.

Comey just shot that down. HE says in his opinion he didnt obstruct justice.

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: yuppa

Yeah, then when Comey doesn't do what Trump asked, he gets fired.

You guys are just playing dumb to not see it.

Or maybe you're not playing, I can't tell.

No remember comey lied/mis remembered to the senate and that was why he was officially canned.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: network dude

If the tardites are right, the Trumpites become the tardites. Just sayin'.

At that point, I will have no other choice but to retaliate with the super adult come back of "I know you are, but what am I."
For your safety, don't be around if that happens.

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: PurpleFox
a reply to: darkbake

Wrong. "Let this go" was referring to the Flynn investigation.

Yeah, I'd say that's pretty much a perfect example of obstruction of justice.

So.. Trump "obstructed justice" and Comey didn't follow the law and report it to his boss. Where does that leave us? hmmm??

I'd say, judging by where we currently are, that pretty much leaves us with one guy that's been fired and one guy that still needs to be fired.

Comey just shot that down. HE says in his opinion he didnt obstruct justice.

No he didn't.

He left and is leaving that determination up to the judgement of special counsel Mueller to determine.

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: PurpleFox
a reply to: darkbake

Wrong. "Let this go" was referring to the Flynn investigation.

Yeah, I'd say that's pretty much a perfect example of obstruction of justice.

So.. Trump "obstructed justice" and Comey didn't follow the law and report it to his boss. Where does that leave us? hmmm??

I'd say, judging by where we currently are, that pretty much leaves us with one guy that's been fired and one guy that still needs to be fired.

Comey just shot that down. HE says in his opinion he didnt obstruct justice.

No he didn't.

He left and is leaving that determination up to the judgement of special counsel Mueller to determine.

They asked comey. he did say that he didnt think trump obstructed. Earlier in the hearing that is. you must a missed it.

Comey was asked to compromise his morals and principles.

He was fired for refusing to compromise them.

You have to respect that, and if you don't your morals and principles are already compromised.

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: PurpleFox
a reply to: darkbake

Wrong. "Let this go" was referring to the Flynn investigation.

Yeah, I'd say that's pretty much a perfect example of obstruction of justice.

So.. Trump "obstructed justice" and Comey didn't follow the law and report it to his boss. Where does that leave us? hmmm??

I'd say, judging by where we currently are, that pretty much leaves us with one guy that's been fired and one guy that still needs to be fired.

Comey just shot that down. HE says in his opinion he didnt obstruct justice.

No he didn't.

He left and is leaving that determination up to the judgement of special counsel Mueller to determine.

They asked comey. he did say that he didnt think trump obstructed. Earlier in the hearing that is. you must a missed it.

That was prior to being fired. Once Trump fired Comey and told people that he did so because of the Russian probe and to relieve the pressure of being under investigation, it became obstruction.

When Comey was ask why he was fired, he said that according to Trump's own words, he was fired in order to halt or alter the Russian investigation.

That's obstruction!

Of course, Comey then said that ultimately, he was leaving that determination up to special counsel.

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: PurpleFox
a reply to: darkbake

Wrong. "Let this go" was referring to the Flynn investigation.

Yeah, I'd say that's pretty much a perfect example of obstruction of justice.

So.. Trump "obstructed justice" and Comey didn't follow the law and report it to his boss. Where does that leave us? hmmm??

I'd say, judging by where we currently are, that pretty much leaves us with one guy that's been fired and one guy that still needs to be fired.

Comey just shot that down. HE says in his opinion he didnt obstruct justice.

No he didn't.

He left and is leaving that determination up to the judgement of special counsel Mueller to determine.

They asked comey. he did say that he didnt think trump obstructed. Earlier in the hearing that is. you must a missed it.

That was prior to being fired. Once Trump fired Comey and told people that he did so because of the Russian probe and to relieve the pressure of being under investigation, it became obstruction.

When Comey was ask why he was fired, he said that according to Trump's own words, he was fired in order to halt or alter the Russian investigation.

That's obstruction!

Of course, Comey then said that ultimately, he was leaving that determination up to special counsel.

De nile is not just a river in egypt huh?

originally posted by: MyHappyDogShiner
Comey was asked to compromise his morals and principles.

He was fired for refusing to compromise them.

You have to respect that, and if you don't your morals and principles are already compromised.

Let just call it a "matter" like Lynch told Comey to do for Hillary and chalk it up....

LOL! Demtards sinking ever further into the abyss.

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: DJW001

You say stupid, that's your right. Illegal? Hardly.

That's for he courts to decide. If Trump were competent, we would all be talking about the pros and cons of his infrastructure bill instead of the way he acts like a gangster.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: UKTruth

Not the same example with Trump as we know he was not under investigation.

Bill Clinton was not under investigation. Mike Flynn is, so....

Nope, Trump (not under investigation) had a conversation with the FBI Director. Normal.

Bill Clinton, wife under investigation, has a meeting with the AG - not normal.

Your comparison was ill thought out.

Please explain. We don't know what Clinton discussed with Lynch. We do know what Trump supposedly said to Comey. If what Comey says is true, Trump was attempting to obstruct justice. Deal with it.

a reply to: DJW001

Nope. Your obstruction of justice fantasies are dead. Bad luck.

As for Lynch... She's in trouble