An article from 1963 that predicted current events.

The Article

It's interesting how the left and globalists have nearly conformed to these exact bulletins, some they have reversed and used them in a different fashion. A new look at what we have today and assume that its right. When in reality we are all being sold out to a communist OWG globalist agenda and are so misinformed from an early age we don't even realize it.

Some that caught my eye were:



#3 Barack Obama pledged to "set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons, and pursue it.

Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

#6 North Korea, Cuba, China all recieve aid from USA/UN

Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

#11 Agenda 21

Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

#16 The list of applicable rulings here is long...

Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

#17

Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

#19

Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

#20 Do I need say...

Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

#21 refer to #20

Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

#22 Civil war statues in the southern USA other public art that was deemed "offensive"

Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."

#23 Media included

Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

#25

Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

#26 SJW have this covered, and NY with their infinite list of 'genders'

Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

#28 Well since the pledge of allegiance has 'God' in it ban that too...

Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."

#29 Arguments against the 2nd Amendment use this all the time

Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

#30 --> #17 The history books are an atrocity

Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

#35 Thanks to Obama/Hillary Cabal and Comey this is done...

Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

#40 Chicago?

Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

#42 SJW, Mizzou, Evergreen, Berkley

Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

a reply to: Sabz228

46. Import anti-white racists from the Third World, via an open-borders policy, then force their integration to divide and conquer white Western civilization in North America.

Quite disturbing to read this list and see how we are now living it. Someone added in #46 later it seems... Hopefully that travel ban gets upheld.

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: Sabz228

46. Import anti-white racists from the Third World, via an open-borders policy, then force their integration to divide and conquer white Western civilization in North America.

Quite disturbing to read this list and see how we are now living it. Someone added in #46 later it seems... Hopefully that travel ban gets upheld.

12-7-2 Jeff...adding a couple of my own numbers: __ 46. Import anti-white racists from the Third World, via an open-borders policy, then force their integration to divide and conquer white Western civilization in North America. - See more at: www.rense.com...

Its interesting, I didn't really get into the added comments because I wanted to stay with the original 45 from 1963, but that edit date, seems out of order, but possibly added in 2012? Far before the 'refugee crisis' we are facing now. Kind of spooky that it is right too.

a reply to: Sabz228

The goals of the article are having very broad application. It is hilarious to state that because of the fact current reality represents "some of them" in "some manner" the goals had been followed throughout the recent history.

I will say it again, the fact that USA is to big extent social oriented(because USA understands that this is how money flow in 21st cen.) does not mean that it is under communist dictatorship. The article is old piece of crap, that lost two minutes of my morning, not very thankful I am. Chill out Americans, the world is not revolving around your country, no matter hour hard you've been taught to believe so.

a reply to: Sabz228

You control a countries energy policies and you control it's economic destiny. This whole agenda from the Montreal Accord right up to the Paris Agreement has been about control. A one world Guv, and Trump is now throwing a huge wrench into the works. The USA should dump the UN, it can lead the world, not be led by it.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.) - See more at: www.rense.com...

Progressive Liberals like to call the Constitution a 'living document' like as if those 'old timers' that wrote it had no idea what they were talking about. Interpreting the Second Amendment and taking away the right to bear arms is just one such example they will try to do.

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis. - See more at: www.rense.com...

a reply to: Sabz228

While I am skeptical on this so called Communist conspiracy a few things caught my interest:

On number 17:

I had a professor who told me that the liberal coastal elite dominated academia and said that if he doesn't tow the line, he'll lose his job.

On number 25:


On number 42, pulling fire alarms are seen as a form of protest in my college:

a reply to: Argentbenign
But don't you know there is one hiding under every bed?

Watch Yuri Bezmenov on youtube - frighteningly accurate:

a reply to: Sabz228

Dr Day also predicted todays events in a talk he gave to a group of other doctors - ‘Everything Is In Place And Nobody Can Stop Us Now’ – Dr Day 1969 Lecture.

This is a transcript of two out of three tapes on the “New World System” recorded in 1988, published at rense.com.

They are Dr. Lawrence Dunegan’s recollections of a lecture he attended on March 20, 1969 at a meeting of the Pittsburgh Pediatric Society. The speaker was Richard Day, MD. (See rense.com) Dunegan first revealed this on the Randy Engels radio show. His son is now creating a website to preserve the tapes.

1. Everything is in place and nobody can stop us now.
2. He [Dr Day] indicated that there is much more co-operation between East and West than most people realise.
3. Most people don’t understand how governments operate and even people in high positions in governments don’t really understand how and where decisions are made.
4. People who really influence decisions are names that for the most part would be familiar to most of us, but he would not use individuals’ names — people of prominence who were primarily known in their private occupations.
5. His purpose in telling our group about these changes that were to be brought about was to make it easier for us to adapt to these changes.
6. One of the statements had to do with change. “People will have to get used to the idea of change, so used to change, that they’ll be expecting change. Nothing will be permanent.” This in the context of a society where people seemed to have no roots or moorings, but would be passively willing to accept change simply because it was all they had ever known.
7. “People are too trusting, they don’t ask the right questions.”
8. “Everything has two purposes. One is the ostensible purpose which will make it acceptable to people and second is the real purpose which would further the goals of establishing the new system.
9. Numbers of people living at any one time on the planet must be limited or we will run out of space to live. We will outgrow our food supply and pollute the world with our waste.
10. People won’t be allowed to have babies just because they want to. Some people would be allowed only one, however outstanding people might be selected and allowed to have three.
11. Contraceptives would be displayed more prominently in drug stores, right up with the cigarettes and chewing gum. Contraceptives would be advertised and also dispensed in the schools in association with sex education!
12. Sex Education is a tool of world government. Many cities in the United States by this time have already set up school-based clinics, which are primarily contraception, birth control, population control clinics.
13. Now back in 1969, four years before Roe vs. Wade, he said, “Abortion will no longer be a crime.” 14. “People will be given permission to be homosexual.” 15. Clothing would be more stimulating and provocative. Bras would be thinner and softer allowing more natural movement.
14. Divorce would be made easier and more prevalent. More people will not marry. Unmarried people would stay in hotels and even live together. That would be very common.
15. More women will work outside the home. More men will be transferred to other cities and in their jobs, more men would travel. Therefore, it would be harder for families to stay together. This would tend to make the marriage relationship less stable. Travel would be easier, less expensive, for a while, so that people who did have to travel would feel they could get back to their families…. Rather a diabolical approach to this whole thing!
16. Everybody has a right to live only so long. The old are no longer useful. They become a burden. Some things that would help people realize that they had lived long enough, e.g., the use of very pale printing ink on forms that are necessary to fill out. Older people wouldn’t be able to read the pale ink as easily and would need to go to younger people for help.
17. Automobile — there would be more high-speed traffic lanes that older people with their slower reflexes would have trouble dealing with and thus, loses some of their independence.
18. The cost of medical care would be made burdensomely high. Medical care would be connected very closely with one’s work but also would be made very, very high in cost so that it would simply be unavailable to people beyond a certain time.
19. The young would become agreeable to helping Mom and Dad along the way, provided this was done humanely and with dignity. Then the example was – there could be a nice, farewell party, a real celebration. Mom and Dad had done a good job. Then after the party’s over they take the ‘demise pill’.
20. There would be profound changes in the practice of medicine. Overall, it would be much more tightly controlled. “Congress is not going to go along with national health insurance, it is now, abundantly evident. But it’s not necessary, we have other ways to control health care”. Costs would be forced up so that people won’t be able to afford to go without insurance. People pay for it, you’re entitled to it. Your role being responsible for your own care would be diminished.
21. The insurance company, paying for your care, does not pay that same amount. If you are charged, say, $600 for the use of an operating room, the insurance company does not pay $600; they only pay $300 or $400. You would feel grateful for insurance.
22. Identification would be needed to get into the building. The security in and around hospitals would be established and gradually increased so that nobody without identification could get in or move around inside the building. Theft of hospital equipment, things like typewriters and microscopes and so forth would be ‘allowed’ and exaggerated; reports of it would be exaggerated so that this would be the excuse needed to establish the need for strict security until people got used to it.
23. This need for ID would start in small ways: hospitals, some businesses, gradually expand to include everybody in all places! 26. It was observed that hospitals can be used to confine people and for the treatment of criminals.
24. The image of the doctor would change. No longer would he be seen as an individual professional in service to individual patients. The job is to include things like executions by lethal injection. The image of the doctor being a powerful, independent person would have to be changed. He went on to say, “Doctors are making entirely too much money. They should advertise like any other product.”
25. Lawyers would be advertising, too.
26. The solo practitioner would become a thing of the past. Most doctors would be employed by an institution of one kind or another. Along with that, of course, unstated but necessary, is the employee serves his employer, not his patient.
27. He said there would be new diseases to appear which had not ever been seen before. Would be very difficult to diagnose and be untreatable – at least for along time. No elaboration was made on this. I now think that AIDS probably was a manufactured disease.
28. Cancer. He said, “We can cure almost every cancer right now. Information is on file in the Rockefeller Institute, if it’s ever decided that it should be released. Ultimately the cancer cures which were being hidden in the Rockefeller Institute would come to light because independ

originally posted by: Argentbenign
a reply to: Sabz228

The goals of the article are having very broad application. It is hilarious to state that because of the fact current reality represents "some of them" in "some manner" the goals had been followed throughout the recent history.

I will say it again, the fact that USA is to big extent social oriented(because USA understands that this is how money flow in 21st cen.) does not mean that it is under communist dictatorship. The article is old piece of crap, that lost two minutes of my morning, not very thankful I am. Chill out Americans, the world is not revolving around your country, no matter hour hard you've been taught to believe so.

It's not just the United States, but Canada and Europe too.

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: Sabz228

You control a countries energy policies and you control it's economic destiny. This whole agenda from the Montreal Accord right up to the Paris Agreement has been about control. A one world Guv, and Trump is now throwing a huge wrench into the works. The USA should dump the UN, it can lead the world, not be led by it.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.) - See more at: www.rense.com...

Progressive Liberals like to call the Constitution a 'living document' like as if those 'old timers' that wrote it had no idea what they were talking about. Interpreting the Second Amendment and taking away the right to bear arms is just one such example they will try to do.

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis. - See more at: www.rense.com...

I am not progressive for the most part (slightly socially) but the constitution is a living breathing document. It's just you can't say what it means one day and then say it means something else another day. The amendments make it a living document. Always there and up for changing. But I stress, it has to be done correctly,which doesn't seem to be anyone's agenda because it's too hard.

Damn all the frog fellators should be worried.
Aren't all those "globalists" like secret lizard people or something?
Lizards eat frogs don't they?

Oh, dark times indeed.

K~

Thanks for sharing. I decided to read the actual book today. It was very fascinating. Reading the book actually now has me truly feeling disheartened about those in government. It seems that our government has been making atrocious decisions for a longer time than I realized. So, much written in there that I did not know.

originally posted by: CynConcepts
Thanks for sharing. I decided to read the actual book today. It was very fascinating. Reading the book actually now has me truly feeling disheartened about those in government. It seems that our government has been making atrocious decisions for a longer time than I realized. So, much written in there that I did not know.

I would say that the entire process started with FDR, all the way back to the post depression era New Deal gov programs (CCC, TVA, WPA, AAA, SSA, ect...)

Ah yes, the old "Communist Goals" form the 1963 Congressional Record, been telling people about that one for quite a while now. I've got most of those crossed off as completed. Seems that the red scare was for real and we have totally let our guard down.

Have a look at this website for some more information on this subject.

From Marx to Lenin, Gramsci & Alinsky

Antonio Gramsci was the one to come up with the "conquer from within" concept of the communist plot. Apparently he was just a little a head of his time as the commies of his day didn't treat him too well for his beliefs, but they adopted his methods later on and used them with great result.