It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You could be standing there in the middle of the ball of light," says Friedemann Freund of NASA's SETI Institute in Mountain View, California, US. "Maybe your hair would be electrified, you might have a halo like a saint. But it doesn't burn anything. You might feel a bit funny, but you wouldn't be harmed."
This is what it would feel like to find yourself in the middle of an earthquake light.
These lights are a plasma discharge that happens when a particular type of rock is under stress and builds up an electric charge, Freund says. "We think that when we push the rocks together very fast, the charge is relieved through a plasma discharge up from the rock."
They can come in many different shapes, forms, and colours.
Coseismic earthquake lights, which happen during an earthquake, are bursts of light coming out of the ground over a space of a few kilometres. They rise 200-300m into the night sky in a fraction of a second, one after another.
In recent years, the abundancy of security cameras has led to beautiful videos of earthquake lights.
"Some of the best records are in Peru," Freund says. "A friend at a local university secured footage when a magnitude 8 earthquake hit the south of Lima. The shock waves were racing through, and as the later waves arrived there was an explosion of lights."
On 12 November 1988, a bright purple-pink globe of light was recorded moving through the sky along the St Lawrence River near the city of Quebec, 11 days before a powerful quake.
Seconds before the 6 April 2009 L’Aquila, Italy, earthquake, people reported seeing 10 cm high flames of light flickering above the stone-paved Francesco Crispi Avenue in the town’s historical city centre.
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Reverbs
So I've read up on the history of philosophy and I think/hope I got a better understanding now what you might have meant with simulation theory.
I'm still not convinced that's what's happening, but I apologise I brushed it off like that.
originally posted by: TEOTWAWKIAIFF
That is a beautiful and eloquent statement about something tnat neither of us can explain!