It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

9/11 Conspiracy Debunkers

page: 6
24
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 21 2017 @ 08:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958




No, no, not 911 Myths. com?

Not a reliable sources anylonger.
I wasn't aware of that, can you show me why you make this claim?



Plastic was the easiest to get on board, from my understanding.

If a knife has a wooden handle, do you give it the label of wooden knife?
Have you ever seen a Leatherman Wave?
They are not plastic.
Did you click the link and look at the image?
Once again you will just ignore any evidence that doesn't follow your narrative.

edit on 21-5-2017 by D8Tee because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 21 2017 @ 08:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

Not reliable in whose estimation...??

What about the FBI report they posted ??

Is that "fake" according to you......??


edit on 21-5-2017 by firerescue because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 21 2017 @ 08:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: MillennialFalcon


Awesome



posted on May, 21 2017 @ 08:43 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee




posted on May, 21 2017 @ 08:53 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux




Before 9/11. How many commercial passenger jet crews resisted hijackings


Was actually a punishable offense by the FAA if tried to stop hijackers

Reason was to prevent possible injury to passengers or crew and damage to aircraft

Decided to land the aircraft and negotiate with hijackers or storm the aircraft while on ground

Cases in 1983 where passengers resisted a hijack attempt and captured the perp

Both cases deranged Cubans trying to get back to Cuba (many criminals and mental cases were sent by Castro
during Mariel boat lift of 1980)

PAN AM Flight 925

www.nytimes.com...

NORTHWEST ORIENT Flight 714

www.nytimes.com...


(post by firerescue removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)
(post by MillennialFalcon removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)

posted on May, 21 2017 @ 09:06 PM
link   
a reply to: MillennialFalcon

Conspiracists wonder why people don't like them? Because their perceived truth is nothing but vague innuendo, false assumptions, lack of understanding, pictures out of context, and misquotes? Then top it of with a fake sense of superiority while avoiding honest debate?


(post by MillennialFalcon removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)

posted on May, 21 2017 @ 09:11 PM
link   



posted on May, 22 2017 @ 07:42 AM
link   
You have to be careful here, or you can lose your posting privileges. But, it's not a secret that certain goverment alphabet agencies employ trolls to stay on top of conspiracies like this, with the latest in goverment propaganda.

Are they on this site? There is absolutely no question that they are, and they are pretty easy to spot, if you know what to look for.



posted on May, 22 2017 @ 10:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Jchristopher5

Who are? What proof do you have? Am I one?



posted on May, 22 2017 @ 10:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Jchristopher5

More innuendo with no proof?



posted on May, 22 2017 @ 10:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Jchristopher5

Better yet? Want to put forth a valid thorey on what caused the collapse of WTC one and two? And who is trolling that theory?



posted on May, 22 2017 @ 02:14 PM
link   
 




 


(post by Jchristopher5 removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)

posted on May, 22 2017 @ 02:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

It didn't matter if they were plastic, or metal, or anything else. Knives were allowed to be carried on board an aircraft prior to 9/11, as long as the blade was 4" or below. And you probably wouldn't have had any trouble getting a slightly longer blade on, because we frequently didn't check them, unless they were something like a K-Bar, or a big knife like that.
edit on 5/22/2017 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 22 2017 @ 02:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jchristopher5
You have to be careful here, or you can lose your posting privileges. But, it's not a secret that certain goverment alphabet agencies employ trolls to stay on top of conspiracies like this, with the latest in goverment propaganda.

Are they on this site? There is absolutely no question that they are, and they are pretty easy to spot, if you know what to look for.
Who are you accusing?



posted on May, 22 2017 @ 02:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: D8Tee

originally posted by: Jchristopher5
You have to be careful here, or you can lose your posting privileges. But, it's not a secret that certain goverment alphabet agencies employ trolls to stay on top of conspiracies like this, with the latest in goverment propaganda.

Are they on this site? There is absolutely no question that they are, and they are pretty easy to spot, if you know what to look for.
Who are you accusing?

I am pretty sure that I didn't accuse anyone specifically. That is against our terms of service.

I simply said the government hires paid trolls for propaganda purposes.



posted on May, 22 2017 @ 03:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

If check out the post listing some of the knives purchased by the hijackers most had blades of around 3 inch

Then there is the Stanley utility - most people would consider that a "tool" vs weapon

As pointed out the operative sent to test the system was able to get knives onboard by packing them with art supplies

"Oh that - I use it to cut the matte boards for mounting my art projects....."



new topics

top topics



 
24
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join