It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The geopolitical crisis is expected to face a critical juncture this week as U.S. Vice President Mike Pence makes a three-day visit to Seoul from Sunday afternoon, during which he will discuss a possible breakthrough with his South Korean counterpart, Acting President Hwang Kyo-ahn.
Against this backdrop, a senior journalist here has raised startling claims that secret talks had begun between the U.S. and North Korea in New York to end the crisis.
The North's recent revival of a parliamentary foreign affairs commission was a "prelude" to the alleged bilateral dialogue, said Korea Economic editorial writer Jeong Kyu-jaeI, in a self-produced news analysis video posted on YouTube on Friday afternoon.
He did not present any concrete evidence of the alleged secret talks, merely claiming that his claim was based on intelligence from credible sources. The video has been watched more than 150,000 times as of Sunday noon.
"It seems to be true that a secret meeting between the U.S. and North Korea has begun," Jeong says in the 20-minute video." As far as I know, the U.S. will demand that North Korea permanently abandon, not freeze, its nuclear program."
The Korea Times contracted government bodies handling North Korean issues, but nobody confirmed such a meeting.
The favors Washington is reported to have offered in return for the North's permanent abandonment of its nuclear program are somewhat mind-boggling.
According to Jeong, the U.S. has expressed its willingness to establish a formal diplomatic relationship with North Korea. Once the relationship is formed, Washington would station an infantry outside Pyongyang, North Korea's capital, to protect the Kim Jong-un regime, and the U.S. Navy would support the mission at North Korea's military port in Wonsan, according to the journalist.
"If the dialogue turns out to be productive, U.S. President Donald Trump might send his special envoy to the North in a clandestine manner in late April or early May," he said. "This is a scenario that will play out only when things unfold smoothly. If the talks are unsuccessful, the U.S. might consider a military strike as the next option."
originally posted by: shawmanfromny
I hope this is true, but it's "based on intelligence from credible sources," so who knows. It would certainly be good news for the United States and the Korean Peninsula. Maybe this is the reason why Trump's administration hasn't addressed NK's failed missile launch. Maybe the missile launch was just a "tantrum" by Kim Jung-un's regime because of something that wasn't addressed in these "secret talks." If Trump can turn this crisis around diplomatically, you think the Lib press gives him some praise?
a senior journalist here has raised startling claims that secret talks had begun between the U.S. and North Korea in New York to end the crisis.
The North's recent revival of a parliamentary foreign affairs commission was a "prelude" to the alleged bilateral dialogue, said Korea Economic editorial writer Jeong Kyu-jaeI, in a self-produced news analysis video posted on YouTube on Friday afternoon.
He did not present any concrete evidence of the alleged secret talks, merely claiming that his claim was based on intelligence from credible sources. The video has been watched more than 150,000 times as of Sunday noon.
"It seems to be true that a secret meeting between the U.S. and North Korea has begun," Jeong says in the 20-minute video." As far as I know, the U.S. will demand that North Korea permanently abandon, not freeze, its nuclear program."
The Korea Times contracted government bodies handling North Korean issues, but nobody confirmed such a meeting.
The favors Washington is reported to have offered in return for the North's permanent abandonment of its nuclear program are somewhat mind-boggling.
According to Jeong, the U.S. has expressed its willingness to establish a formal diplomatic relationship with North Korea. Once the relationship is formed, Washington would station an infantry outside Pyongyang, North Korea's capital, to protect the Kim Jong-un regime, and the U.S. Navy would support the mission at North Korea's military port in Wonsan, according to the journalist.
"If the dialogue turns out to be productive, U.S. President Donald Trump might send his special envoy to the North in a clandestine manner in late April or early May," he said. "This is a scenario that will play out only when things unfold smoothly. If the talks are unsuccessful, the U.S. might consider a military strike as the next option."
www.koreatimes.co.kr...
Is there a way to get English subtitles to work on this YouTube clip? It's the clip showing Korea Economic editorial writer Jeong Kyu-jaeI talking about this.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: shawmanfromny
Who knows, maybe talking to each other might work, we know that lobbing bombs doesn't work - see Syria for case-in-point.
originally posted by: shawmanfromny
a reply to: brutus61
He comes up with good ideas while on the golf course!
originally posted by: Advantage
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: shawmanfromny
Who knows, maybe talking to each other might work, we know that lobbing bombs doesn't work - see Syria for case-in-point.
Nah, you just have to lob more and bigger.
originally posted by: Wookiep
a reply to: Advantage
Well to be fair, the last part of the OP did mention military action if this thing doesn't pan out...
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
originally posted by: Advantage
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: shawmanfromny
Who knows, maybe talking to each other might work, we know that lobbing bombs doesn't work - see Syria for case-in-point.
Nah, you just have to lob more and bigger.
Phew, lucky money grows on trees and everyone is financially comfortable and living a happy life.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: shawmanfromny
Who knows, maybe talking to each other might work, we know that lobbing bombs doesn't work - see Syria for case-in-point.
originally posted by: Advantage
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
originally posted by: Advantage
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: shawmanfromny
Who knows, maybe talking to each other might work, we know that lobbing bombs doesn't work - see Syria for case-in-point.
Nah, you just have to lob more and bigger.
Phew, lucky money grows on trees and everyone is financially comfortable and living a happy life.
You guys dont seem to get a joke or sarcasm tonight, today, whatever it is.. dorks.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
originally posted by: Advantage
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
originally posted by: Advantage
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: shawmanfromny
Who knows, maybe talking to each other might work, we know that lobbing bombs doesn't work - see Syria for case-in-point.
Nah, you just have to lob more and bigger.
Phew, lucky money grows on trees and everyone is financially comfortable and living a happy life.
You guys dont seem to get a joke or sarcasm tonight, today, whatever it is.. dorks.
LOL - I answered you with sarcasm, I'm on my 3rd beer and having a great old time. Don't worry, my sarc meter is calibrated and fully functioning.
Burp