US launches Tomahawks on Syrian airbases

a reply to: MrPlow

Yeah, ya know that's a good damn question.

I mean how the hell did this happen??? Did we allow for just the President alone to start a war all by himself at some point???

Who the hell authorized any of this and with such speed???

Nothing in government can move this quickly....Ever.

How did this attack get authorized and put in action this fast and who's in charge of it all??

originally posted by: kosmicjack
So now we know just how cosy Trump is with the Globalist Cabal.

But...wasn't he supposed to be cozy with the Russians?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: vjr1113

Police action.

Team America World Police?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: gpols

I wonder if there are any Migs at that airfield.

Nope. it's just a base for Su-17s.

North Korea is next i'll bet

Trump is probably telling China's president that as this is unfolding. If N.K. fires one more missile i think US may retaillate with no warning.

a reply to: kosmicjack

Trump cares about people. He was visibly upset seeing the images of children harmed and killed by the chemical attacks.
He did something about it.

Doesn't this mean that we are now officially/directly at war against Syria?
Or at least, made a direct act of war?

I'm not sure if the US has ever attacked Syria directly.

Correct me if I'm wrong!


Edit:
Also, what about congress?

My friend told me about some resolution made during Vietnam that allows a president to use military force without congressional approval for 30 days

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: BlueAjah

Perhaps.

As a previous poster suggested, perhaps was part of bargaining with Russia. All assuming this is not some sort of extremely fast moving false flag.

IDK the actual story just yet but the "offical" one stinks.

As most "official" stories do...

I don't think it was a false flag, but more of a "never let a good tragedy go to waste" type of thing.

originally posted by: kosmicjack
So now we know just how cosy Trump is with the Globalist Cabal.

In this regard, he can't win. People whine that he was owned by the Russians, he does this and now it's "he's owned by the globalists." If he eats a meal children are starving in Africa, if he fasts for a day he's promoting eating disorders. THIS is why he acts unilaterally and exhibits "here is the field where I grow my damns, note that it's soil is barren" attitudes towards his detractors, because he knows they'll jump him regardless of what he does.

a reply to: Phage
Yes EXACTLY. Reporters from April 3rd 2017 stating they are going to cover gas attacks that occurred on April 04 2017. This make sense how???
a reply to: MrPlow
AUMF from 9/11 is still in effect. No congress between then and how has recinded it. Any US President can unilaterally strike anywhere in the world as long as it is in place.

So do we get a discount on our foreign aid payments to Israel now?

a reply to: face23785

That's exactly why Trump needs to think about further action. If you take out Assad there has to be some kind of supporting government in place. Not having a governing infrastructure will be adding more fuel to the MENA fire.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: kosmicjack

Trump cares about people. He was visibly upset seeing the images of children harmed and killed by the chemical attacks.
He did something about it.

No he didn't.

These strikes weren't aimed at the Islamists who had the chemical weapons.

originally posted by: EchoesInTime

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: DBCowboy

Same as in the other thread.

What in the actual f)(#????

News breaks that Syria used gas on children, next day were launching missiles at their infrastructure. Preceded by HRC coming out of the basement to say "Hay guyz!! I would totally lauch missiles at their airfields!"

Red flags should be raised in minds across the world.

Clinton made her statements hours ago calling for strikes and now it's happening. She seemed to know before the rest of us. Definitely red flags.

It's curious to say the least. Also very fast moving.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: kosmicjack

Trump cares about people. He was visibly upset seeing the images of children harmed and killed by the chemical attacks.
He did something about it.

Ya, lot's of us were upset by it. But the President isn't just allowed to start a war with another nation because how he feels one day.

That's just f*cking madness!!!

Here we go again. (TM)

Anti-Trumpsters can not concieve that Trump knows more than they do and they yell on the internet that Trump doesn't know what he's doing.

When it's been a long time coming and Obama should have done it.

originally posted by: Riffrafter

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: BlueAjah

Perhaps.

As a previous poster suggested, perhaps was part of bargaining with Russia. All assuming this is not some sort of extremely fast moving false flag.

IDK the actual story just yet but the "offical" one stinks.

As most "official" stories do...

I don't think it was a false flag, but more of a "never let a good tragedy go to waste" type of thing.

Under the assumption that it is not a FF, questioning the motive is interesting. Who gains..directly? All eyes to Russia in that respect.

a reply to: Phage

Not any more.

TheRedneck

a reply to: MOMof3

TPTB did. Come on. Try to keep up.