Susan Rice Ordered Spy Agencies To Produce ‘Detailed Spreadsheets’ Involving Trump

There is nothing "incidental" about compiling spreadsheets for over a year.

These spreadsheets are proof a deliberate and ongoing targeting of the Trump team by the Obama Administration.

There needs to be an immediate congressional hearing on Rice and her spreadsheets.

Who ordered Rice to spy on Trump and complie these spreadsheets well before Trump was even the nominee?

And then we have Nunes' evidence that has nothing to do with Russians.

Former President Barack Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice ordered U.S. spy agencies to produce “detailed spreadsheets” of legal phone calls involving Donald Trump and his aides when he was running for president, according to former U.S. Attorney Joseph diGenova.

“What was produced by the intelligence community at the request of Ms. Rice were detailed spreadsheets of intercepted phone calls with unmasked Trump associates in perfectly legal conversations with individuals,” diGenova told The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group Monday.

“The overheard conversations involved no illegal activity by anybody of the Trump associates, or anyone they were speaking with,” diGenova said. “In short, the only apparent illegal activity was the unmasking of the people in the calls.”

Other knowledgeable official sources with direct knowledge and who requested anonymity confirmed to TheDCNF diGenova’s description of surveillance reports Rice ordered one year before the 2016 presidential election.

dailycaller.com...

a reply to: Deny Arrogance

We KNOW who ordered Susan Rice to collate and organize this info. Just look at WHO is sitting next to her in your photo. She kept a relatively low profile in the Administration for a reason. Good find, D.A.!

a reply to: Deny Arrogance

This is getting ridiculous.
A public trial does the public no justice.

a reply to: Deny Arrogance

Where are they in that photo in your OP? What room are they in?

It looks incredibly mundane, look at that metal door handle. It's like a visitation center at a corrections facility.

Oh and to the topic, one of these three women will be indicted as a result of all this:

Evelyn Farkas
Susan Rice
Loretta Lynch

Not on that list is Hillary Clinton & Barack Obama, because they are obviously above the law.

Seems Joseph diGenova has a pattern of saying unfounded stuff.

Right-wing media are reporting discredited Republican lawyer Joseph diGenova's baseless claim that Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton committed "numerous federal crimes" with her private email use, failing to note that Clinton is not the target of the FBI's investigation and that the probe is not criminal in nature. mediamatters.org...

a reply to: Deny Arrogance

I think Michelle Obama, Susan Rice, Loretta Lynch, and Donna Brazil, are part of the ABW* movement that Michelle Obama kept insisting didn't exist...

*Ref: www.cnn.com...

With every defense of Rice in this story,
Democrats are the New Surveillance State.

I agree with Rand Paul 100% she needs to be
before Congress under oath.

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: Deny Arrogance

Where are they in that photo in your OP? What room are they in?

It looks incredibly mundane, look at that metal door handle. It's like a visitation center at a corrections facility.

How ironic you should say that...because soon we will have a picture of them just like that except they will be wearing orange jumpsuits and armed guards will be standing behind them.

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: Deny Arrogance

Where are they in that photo in your OP? What room are they in?

It looks incredibly mundane, look at that metal door handle. It's like a visitation center at a corrections facility.

If real, it is a SCIF.

a reply to: RazorV66

Well, Rice maybe but Obama definitely not. Former presidents have the luxury of having designated patsies take the fall for them. That extends to former first ladies, too.

originally posted by: Annee
Seems Joseph diGenova has a pattern of saying unfounded stuff.

Right-wing media are reporting discredited Republican lawyer Joseph diGenova's baseless claim that Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton committed "numerous federal crimes" with her private email use, failing to note that Clinton is not the target of the FBI's investigation and that the probe is not criminal in nature. mediamatters.org...

So do 99.9% of the deranged Leftists.

originally posted by: Annee
Seems Joseph diGenova has a pattern of saying unfounded stuff.

Right-wing media are reporting discredited Republican lawyer Joseph diGenova's baseless claim that Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton committed "numerous federal crimes" with her private email use, failing to note that Clinton is not the target of the FBI's investigation and that the probe is not criminal in nature. mediamatters.org...

Your source is MediaMatters? Fail.

Of course Soros and David Brock would say that.

a reply to: ColdWisdom

We're now working on ANOTHER connect-the-dots picture puzzle.

"Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch signed off on both FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance) Court requests to wiretap the Trump campaign, according to reports."

Source: www.worldtribune.com...

So..Loretta Lynch signed-off on the authorizations to Spy on Trump, and Susan Rice compiled, unmasked, and "leaked" anything negative to the U.S. media? That's SICK!

a reply to: Annee

Umm, Hillary did commit numerous federal crimes. It's just that the corrupt Obama administration protected what they thought was their heir princess.

Careful...those spread sheets just might reveal details about Trump that he might prefer to remain private.

But open them up for all to see anyway!!

originally posted by: Annee
Seems Joseph diGenova has a pattern of saying unfounded stuff.

Susan Rice beats him hands down.

"Benghazi attack was spontaneous uprising from a video"

a reply to: burntheships

Yeah
They prosecuted the guy that made the video as well.

a reply to: Deny Arrogance

Other knowledgeable official sources with direct knowledge and who requested anonymity

Were you saying something about unnamed sources and zero evidence?

LOL

a reply to: Deny Arrogance

Who gives a flying flipping frickin fookin leap why any one from america talked to a russian? Most retarded thing ive ever heard of. And ive heard it going on 40 freecking years. Give it a gosh darned break peeeeeples! By people i mean msm and us government. Ever heard of the boy who cried wolf??????

originally posted by: burntheships
With every defense of Rice in this story,
Democrats are the New Surveillance State.

I agree with Rand Paul 100% she needs to be
before Congress under oath.

I hope she is called before Congress under oath. Problem is she would just take the fifth like so many others. Then what?