It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: earthling42
a reply to: 23432
A minister has no diplomatic immunity and she was on dutch soil.
The threats towards the Netherlands but also the intent for a massive manifestation meant that the dutch government had no other options but to refuse entry.
Turkey has simply damaged itself by acting in this way and they continue to do so with their insults and threats.
The dutch turks in the Netherlands are first and foremost dutch citizens, however, if they prefer Erdogan, they are free to move to and live in Turkey. Their choise.
originally posted by: earthling42
a reply to: 23432
Turks will be attacked in Holland and Dutch Government will blame Erdogan as a culprit of these attacks .
Actually it is the other way around, it is turks against Dutch turks.
The dutch don't lower themselves to such a level.
originally posted by: BeneGesseritWitch
a reply to: 23432
I really like you your like a more educated version of myself; saying your guy says it like it is. You know some people could argue Trump says it like it is.
I'm not even going to argue the importance of Erdogan (I wouldnt even be able to get his name right unless your comment was right above mine) in your political system. Turkey's place on the global stage has long been that of polarized constituency and a melting pot.
This thread,
alluded to Turkey's growing influence on Europe because of that position of the established difference of west vs east; the fact that two days before an election, after the proper channels told the state their officials were not welcomed continued down the path with a determination and uncharacteristically deceptive manner, I mean a motorcade of cars would work for a car thief in this part of the world, but to even think you could hide a political character in one of them so far from home, Turkey really deserves a part in the EU.
originally posted by: earthling42
a reply to: 23432
So what game is being played?
originally posted by: earthling42
a reply to: 23432
The permanent members.
Russia, China, US, UK, France.
Non-permanent, elected every two years. 2017-2018
Bolivia 2018, Egypt 2017, Ethiopia 2018, Italy 2018, Japan 2017, Kazakhstan 2018, Senegal 2017, Sweden 2018, Ukraine 2017, Uruguay 2017.
Turkey was part of the counsil in 2009 and 2010
Pakistan 2012 and 2013
Nigeria 2014 and 2015
Azerbaijan 2012 and 2013
Bosnia 2010 and 2011
India 2011 and 2012
Lebanon 2010 and 2011
Malaysia 2015 and 2016
Morocco 2012 and 2013
Saudi Arabia was scheduled to be part of the UN security council in 2014 and 2015, but they declined due to not being in the position to take the seat. that is what the letter from Saudi Arabia to the UN council states.
originally posted by: earthling42
a reply to: 23432
Yes and no.
Yes, because it is always good to look at old formats.
No, because muslim countries are members of the UN security council, albeit non permanent which means there is a roulation between members of the UN.
There is an absence of a permanent member of the African continent.
So the permanent base could be broadened.
A vote is always with either 15 members of the current council, or broad on important resolutions (60 members)
So there is no question of listening to 5.
" Infestation " , eh ?
So officially get invited by Dutch Government to help build Netherlands up to what it is and get referred as " infestation " .
I don't live in Holland but I could if I wanted to because the Law gives me a " Right " to do so .
I also like my smokes but that is besides the issue .
I have number of citizenships and I vote in number of Countries . Why should I give up my " Right " to vote ?
originally posted by: WaxingGibbons
a reply to: 23432
" Infestation " , eh ?
Yes.
So officially get invited by Dutch Government to help build Netherlands up to what it is and get referred as " infestation " .
Yes, you were called "gastarbeiders" or "guestworkers". Guests should go home eventually. You know the saying, "guests are like fish, they begin to stink after a few days."
Especially if they don't actually work.....
originally posted by: WaxingGibbons
a reply to: 23432
I don't live in Holland but I could if I wanted to because the Law gives me a " Right " to do so .
The first thing we need to do is get rid of this double nationality. If people like you are so damn proud of their beloved Turkey then they should all go live there and give up their Dutch nationality.
I am proud of lots of different places and different peoples of earth , including the Dutch allthough I am not a citizen of Netherlands .For the record I don't have a double citizenship ; I am a proud citizen of 4 nations .
You are just a provincial individual who doesn't understand and therefore fear me.
I also like my smokes but that is besides the issue .
Can't smoke your smokes in Turkey?
I smoke wherever my heart desires , including Istanbul ,NY , London , Moscow and Amsterdam . I think I call this act of smoking a freedom issue above all ; nothing to do with nationalism nor religion.
I have number of citizenships and I vote in number of Countries . Why should I give up my " Right " to vote ?
Why should we have foreign elements that have no allegiance to our country vote in our country. Like I said we need to change the law to stop foreign elements like you.