It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Unneeded? According to you. The Marines lost something like 16 people last year to accidents that didn't need to happen, and only happened because of lack of funding for maintenance and flying time. So your idea is to keep pushing things and killing people?
To me. Military = war. If we are spending money on it, then we want to use it. I don't want to build up our military and would rather this spending went to that other thing that Trump promised. That thing that is being conveniently ignored now in favor of building up a tool of destruction. Infrastructure.
What evidence do you have that Infrastructure is being ignored?
Why would you make a statement like that?
Do you have any evidence that it is being catered to? You don't prove a negative, mate.
There is evidence in the form of one of the first EO's he signed.
Executive Order Expediting Environmental Reviews and Approvals For High Priority Infrastructure Projects
EO's mean dick. Where is the infrastructure spending allocation in his budget proposal?
Patience. It's coming. If you think EO's are meaningless, no crying about them in the future, deal?
originally posted by: Ohanka
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Ohanka
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: thesaneone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Sure, let's just go on killing our own soldiers while they take years cleaning up the waste spending. Let's just let things get even worse, and spend even more money on the repairs that would be needed then, instead of spending less now.
That's what Trump is about to do to the EPA, so you aren't exactly making me feel sympathetic here. By the way, I'm a veteran if you don't know.
Trump is going to kill soldiers by slashing the epa funding???
Trump will be killing FAR more than soldiers by slashing the EPA's funding.
How did you come to that conclusion?
Because the EPA exists for a reason and relaxing standards will only result in more cases like Flint, MI.
I was expecting some actual analysis and projections and stuff, and not a random statement. Because you provided none I assume your support for the EPA is purely political, until proven otherwise.+
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Zaphod58
Look. By no means am I saying that the EPA is perfect. It certainly isn't. It's a produce of government bureaucracy. But it certainly DOES function as a good check against rampant business oriented greed at the expense of the environment.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Unneeded? According to you. The Marines lost something like 16 people last year to accidents that didn't need to happen, and only happened because of lack of funding for maintenance and flying time. So your idea is to keep pushing things and killing people?
To me. Military = war. If we are spending money on it, then we want to use it. I don't want to build up our military and would rather this spending went to that other thing that Trump promised. That thing that is being conveniently ignored now in favor of building up a tool of destruction. Infrastructure.
What evidence do you have that Infrastructure is being ignored?
Why would you make a statement like that?
Do you have any evidence that it is being catered to? You don't prove a negative, mate.
There is evidence in the form of one of the first EO's he signed.
Executive Order Expediting Environmental Reviews and Approvals For High Priority Infrastructure Projects
EO's mean dick. Where is the infrastructure spending allocation in his budget proposal?
Patience. It's coming. If you think EO's are meaningless, no crying about them in the future, deal?
I said they mean dick. I didn't say they can't be subject to judicial review. Don't put words into my mouth. Deal?
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Zaphod58
Look. By no means am I saying that the EPA is perfect. It certainly isn't. It's a produce of government bureaucracy. But it certainly DOES function as a good check against rampant business oriented greed at the expense of the environment.
You are against the individual states having responsibility?
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Zaphod58
Look. By no means am I saying that the EPA is perfect. It certainly isn't. It's a produce of government bureaucracy. But it certainly DOES function as a good check against rampant business oriented greed at the expense of the environment.
You are against the individual states having responsibility?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Nyiah
THANK YOU! I'm not the only one who sees it as a waste to continue to fund a force we aren't looking to use. All increased military spending tells me is that we are prepping to go to war. As soon as it is prepped, the next thing the government will be looking to do is use it. Happens every time. I fell for it when I went to Iraq, and today's kids will fall for it again this time.
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Unneeded? According to you. The Marines lost something like 16 people last year to accidents that didn't need to happen, and only happened because of lack of funding for maintenance and flying time. So your idea is to keep pushing things and killing people?
To me. Military = war. If we are spending money on it, then we want to use it. I don't want to build up our military and would rather this spending went to that other thing that Trump promised. That thing that is being conveniently ignored now in favor of building up a tool of destruction. Infrastructure.
What evidence do you have that Infrastructure is being ignored?
Why would you make a statement like that?
Do you have any evidence that it is being catered to? You don't prove a negative, mate.
There is evidence in the form of one of the first EO's he signed.
Executive Order Expediting Environmental Reviews and Approvals For High Priority Infrastructure Projects
EO's mean dick. Where is the infrastructure spending allocation in his budget proposal?
Patience. It's coming. If you think EO's are meaningless, no crying about them in the future, deal?
I said they mean dick. I didn't say they can't be subject to judicial review. Don't put words into my mouth. Deal?
Wasn't the EPA itself formed by an EO signed by Nixon?
Explain yourself as to how 'EO's mean dick", I'm confused.
originally posted by: UKTruth
Will cutting EPA spend and regulations result in more cases like Flint? Do you have any empirical evidence of that?
The EPA might only cost c$10bn a year but the cost to the economy runs into hundreds of billions. I wonder if those costs have really been a valid investment over the years. Last I heard, my liberal friends and the DNC were telling me we're on the brink of the end times because of pollution and it's getting worse - apparently. So either the huge economic cost of the EPA has saved all our lives by buying us a few more years on earth and we'd all have perished long ago without all their regulations, or what they are doing is worth squat. I go with the latter.
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Lol, I thanked you for your service and you are still whining?
Have a good day.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Lol, I thanked you for your service and you are still whining?
Have a good day.
Oh I just take being accused of a VERY serious federal crime a bit seriously that's all.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: D8Tee
How about staying out of it?
And I already gave you a response to that post. Pay attention.