It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Unneeded? According to you. The Marines lost something like 16 people last year to accidents that didn't need to happen, and only happened because of lack of funding for maintenance and flying time. So your idea is to keep pushing things and killing people?
To me. Military = war. If we are spending money on it, then we want to use it. I don't want to build up our military and would rather this spending went to that other thing that Trump promised. That thing that is being conveniently ignored now in favor of building up a tool of destruction. Infrastructure.
What evidence do you have that Infrastructure is being ignored?
Why would you make a statement like that?
Do you have any evidence that it is being catered to? You don't prove a negative, mate.
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Unneeded? According to you. The Marines lost something like 16 people last year to accidents that didn't need to happen, and only happened because of lack of funding for maintenance and flying time. So your idea is to keep pushing things and killing people?
To me. Military = war. If we are spending money on it, then we want to use it. I don't want to build up our military and would rather this spending went to that other thing that Trump promised. That thing that is being conveniently ignored now in favor of building up a tool of destruction. Infrastructure.
What evidence do you have that Infrastructure is being ignored?
Why would you make a statement like that?
Do you have any evidence that it is being catered to? You don't prove a negative, mate.
There is evidence in the form of one of the first EO's he signed.
Executive Order Expediting Environmental Reviews and Approvals For High Priority Infrastructure Projects
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Sure, let's just go on killing our own soldiers while they take years cleaning up the waste spending. Let's just let things get even worse, and spend even more money on the repairs that would be needed then, instead of spending less now.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Sure, let's just go on killing our own soldiers while they take years cleaning up the waste spending. Let's just let things get even worse, and spend even more money on the repairs that would be needed then, instead of spending less now.
That's what Trump is about to do to the EPA, so you aren't exactly making me feel sympathetic here. By the way, I'm a veteran if you don't know.
originally posted by: thesaneone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Sure, let's just go on killing our own soldiers while they take years cleaning up the waste spending. Let's just let things get even worse, and spend even more money on the repairs that would be needed then, instead of spending less now.
That's what Trump is about to do to the EPA, so you aren't exactly making me feel sympathetic here. By the way, I'm a veteran if you don't know.
Trump is going to kill soldiers by slashing the epa funding???
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: thesaneone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Sure, let's just go on killing our own soldiers while they take years cleaning up the waste spending. Let's just let things get even worse, and spend even more money on the repairs that would be needed then, instead of spending less now.
That's what Trump is about to do to the EPA, so you aren't exactly making me feel sympathetic here. By the way, I'm a veteran if you don't know.
Trump is going to kill soldiers by slashing the epa funding???
Trump will be killing FAR more than soldiers by slashing the EPA's funding.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: thesaneone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Sure, let's just go on killing our own soldiers while they take years cleaning up the waste spending. Let's just let things get even worse, and spend even more money on the repairs that would be needed then, instead of spending less now.
That's what Trump is about to do to the EPA, so you aren't exactly making me feel sympathetic here. By the way, I'm a veteran if you don't know.
Trump is going to kill soldiers by slashing the epa funding???
Trump will be killing FAR more than soldiers by slashing the EPA's funding.
originally posted by: Ohanka
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: thesaneone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Sure, let's just go on killing our own soldiers while they take years cleaning up the waste spending. Let's just let things get even worse, and spend even more money on the repairs that would be needed then, instead of spending less now.
That's what Trump is about to do to the EPA, so you aren't exactly making me feel sympathetic here. By the way, I'm a veteran if you don't know.
Trump is going to kill soldiers by slashing the epa funding???
Trump will be killing FAR more than soldiers by slashing the EPA's funding.
How did you come to that conclusion?
originally posted by: thesaneone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: thesaneone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Sure, let's just go on killing our own soldiers while they take years cleaning up the waste spending. Let's just let things get even worse, and spend even more money on the repairs that would be needed then, instead of spending less now.
That's what Trump is about to do to the EPA, so you aren't exactly making me feel sympathetic here. By the way, I'm a veteran if you don't know.
Trump is going to kill soldiers by slashing the epa funding???
Trump will be killing FAR more than soldiers by slashing the EPA's funding.
I doubt it but believe what you want.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently found itself in hot water. The New York Times revealed the agency colluded with environmentalist groups in a campaign to manufacture public comments in favor of a new rule that expands its own power. The agency’s actions and the shenanigans of its environmentalist supporters shed light on how a bad rule can flow through the regulatory process.
The Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule extends the reach of EPA to regulate ponds, ditches and even large puddles under the Clean Water Act (CWA). That’s bad news for farmers, ranchers, small businesses or anyone else who wants to use land under CWA jurisdiction: It costs an average of $270,000 to obtain the special permit required to do so, according to the National Federation of Independent Businesses.
Today, the Environmental Protection Agency is one of the most powerful and most feared regulatory agencies in the country. What was originally intended to be an agency with a relatively modest charter has become much more powerful. The EPA is now claiming unrestrained authority to issue regulations that have major negative consequences for the American economy with little or no accountability to Congress.
Among the most onerous examples of EPA overstepping its authority is the agency's efforts to regulate greenhouse gasses. The EPA has been aided and abetted in its crusade by a controversial 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v. EPA. According to the Supreme Court, because the definition of air pollution in the Clean Air Act is so imprecisely broad, it can be interpreted to grant the EPA the ability to regulate greenhouse gasses.
Why does the EPA need a $715 million police force, a $170 million PR Machine, a nearly $1 billion employment agency for seniors, and a $1.2 billion in-house law firm?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: thesaneone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: thesaneone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Sure, let's just go on killing our own soldiers while they take years cleaning up the waste spending. Let's just let things get even worse, and spend even more money on the repairs that would be needed then, instead of spending less now.
That's what Trump is about to do to the EPA, so you aren't exactly making me feel sympathetic here. By the way, I'm a veteran if you don't know.
Trump is going to kill soldiers by slashing the epa funding???
Trump will be killing FAR more than soldiers by slashing the EPA's funding.
I doubt it but believe what you want.
In any case, the EPA is about protecting our environment and nature that we live in. The military is used to destroy nature and our environment. My priorities lie with the EPA over the military.