How to silence an entire block of protestors

I agree with everybody else, well worth the time to watch big Joe.

Trump should find that man and make him Press Secretary.

Big Joe screaming logic at the political correct media for four years might do them some good.

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: network dude

Noooo...

That is not what I said, or what I meant.

Too bad.

That's what everyone heard.

Welcome to CNN.

All this stuff from whatever side, seriously though...

People (in general): Stop talking and start talking to a therapist.

Focus externally on politics, when internally....there is need for therapy. Lol.

Jenna Marbles on YouTube said it well, "The president is not my daddy and he can't spank me whenever he wants". And whatever the reverse of that is for the other side.

Maybe masses of people are sexually frustrated, who knows....this is getting into Freudian territory lol.

And somehow too, what are the specific issues? There can't even be a coherent discussion with any of this stuff since it's based on emotion.

Really, what could alleviate some of the protesting would be a general apology by Trump, but then at that point the protests aren't even about politics to begin with...

-.-

a reply to: TrueBrit

Humm, he did shut them up. First of all, the racism that exists the most right now in America is against white people, or anyone from any race who dares to believe in conservative values, or in any of the policies that President Trump has talked about, or other conservative values. The left in general is reviving "racism", but this time against whites or anyone else who does not bow to left-wing ideology. Racism for the left is about ideology, and not really about color, or gender.

Second of all, yes there are "real right wing extremists" who agree with some of the policies mentioned by President Trump, but that doesn't make President Trump or everyone who backs him as "rightwing extremists". President Trump never backed any of these groups. However, it was ex-President Obama who approved, and backed BLM, a racist group which has called for the death of police officers and white people. The administration of Obama has been defending these idiots from BLM and other violent and racist groups. The Obama administration and even the entire DNC are backing these violent racist groups simply for being black. Anyone that belongs to any group and calls for violence against anyone else based on color or race, or ideology, whether they are a white racist group, a black racist group, a hispanic racist group ect is racist. But because BLM is mainly a black group the left doesn't want to admit it is a racist, hateful, and violent group among others.

As for your claim that we "should see any but NAZI march as a beautiful manifestation of the constitution"?... Really, so it is okay for BLM and other violent black groups to call for the deaths of whites and police officers simply for being black and only white NAZIs are racist?... Inciting violence and inciting for the destruction of property of others, or to stop Trump from taking office is not okay. When the Tea Party marched on Washington they didn't destroy other people's property, and they didn't call for violence.

BTW, about your argument of "men wanting to control women's bodies"... First of all, there are millions of women in the U.S. and around the world who also believe that the life that grows inside women is sacred. Not to mention the fact that there are already several "liberal" philosophers, scientists, and doctors who are already using "the right to abort" as an excuse to claim that even newborns have no right to life. A new argument has emerged from "progressives". To them parents of newborns should be able to murder their children because in the eyes "of these liberals" newborns don't have rights just like to them human fetuses have no rights.

If there is no line drawn in the sand the "pro abortion argument" will include being able to murder newborns. Big Joe is right, Margaret Sanger was a racist and a violent socialist who also called for the right of people to murder politicians for being capitalists. "Planned parenthood" started as a movement for population control of minorities, and to this day it is still a population control scheme hidden under a mantra of "freedom of women". Heck, tell people "if you kill your baby it means you are free"... It's an argument that makes no sense and in fact borders on insanity.

As for your mention of the NAZIs... They are "national socialists for a reason. I don't follow the ideology of NAZIs these days, but from the start it has been a type of socialist movement.

The NAZIS were extreme environmentalists: check
They imposed heavy regulations and restrictions against all businesses "for the common/collective good". Businesses had to do as Hitler demanded for "the good of all": check
They were anti capitalist and anti Marxist, which many other socialist movements also were and are anti Marxist: check
They hated Jewish people with a passion, which Karl Marx also hated: check
They imposed "the collective good over individualism": check

Heck, even Ghandi started his political activism as a "national socialist" and this group existed and still exists in India. There were/are Muslim nations which also agreed and helped the NAZIS in their common hatred for Jewish people and their love of "socialism".

a reply to: TrueBrit

No True Brit, YOU'RE wrong.

In every state Trump won... he DID win a majority. The election was about winning electors in the states that mattered.

So New York and California have far larger populations than the rest of the U.S., counting NY and CA Hillary won 489 counties. Trump won 2623 counties.

Everyone who keeps screeching about "democracy" and the "popular vote" are just not that bright. In 240 years of the nations history... they STILL can't manage to understand we are a Republic with a representative government, not a democracy.

If 240 years of history isn't sufficient to learn "why?" the Electoral College... it's unlikely they will ever learn.

Of course... if CA and NY were majority conservative states... they would understand it in a matter of moments.

Funny, that. LOL

a reply to: ghaleon12

Why should he apologize?

a reply to: TrueBrit

Triggered

a reply to: burgerbuddy

Then an awful lot of people need to take the red, white and blue wax out of their ears, before considering themselves adequately prepared to converse.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

3rd....

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Then an awful lot of people need to take the red, white and blue wax out of their ears, before considering themselves adequately prepared to converse.

And that is your answer? You are starting to shill for the lies Bro TrueBrit? You're willie-nillie perpetuation the lie by not opening your mind to what your EYES are showing you. I for one, love to hear your comments when you are spot on against right wing stupidity but you have no stupidity radar for left wing variety do you? Get your head in the game and please stop knee jerking against all things conservative or we will consider you all in with that anti guy. I am balanced and honest in my assessment of liars and thieves whomever's team they are on. And if you think you are balanced and fair to the information, I am here to tell you that you have another "think" coming.

I remind you all I am a huge Ron Paul guy who had to cross over to vote R for him and then again I wasted my time on Cruz during the primaries. In the end THIS time, I voted R for president for the 1st time I can remember. I had to vote against the treasonous liar and proven thief Clinton. I didn't see Trump being very much of anything like a racist/bigot but I do see him being narcissistic. Do I feel at this point that whomever is running for Pres or other major Office would be selfless? No not one, that is who.

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Cancerwarrior

He has not made a very good start.

Already taking rights away from women, first thing off the bat, first piece of paper he signed. Does not bode well in the least.

Women don't have a right to my tax dollars for their abortions. I think it bodes very well.

originally posted by: ksiezyc
a reply to: TrueBrit

He won bigly.

YUGE

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Navieko

No...

You STILL need to provide a summary of contents.

Here's a description for ya.

Brave, intelligent bloke tells crowd they are acting without intelligence or bravery, and that they are only doing what they're doing because they've been given permission to be angry by the fake news MSM.

Most of them have absolutely NO idea why they are there, what they are protesting about or even why they're angry...they only know they've been given an excuse to be there and by golly, they are going to be there and shout about...something, anything.

originally posted by: dasman888
a reply to: TrueBrit

No True Brit, YOU'RE wrong.

Please tell me that the inflection on "YOU'RE" was meant for me to read that in an Adam Sandler voice...

I follow it up with, "Momma's right. MOMMA'S RIGHT!"

a reply to: TrueBrit

I assume that you mean the red, white, and blue of this flag:

I was waiting for a skinny masked white kid to sucker punch him.

Smart guy, but arguing with these folks is useless, they are being paid to be contrary and troublesome.

Let it happen, between all the polarization Trump is either the worst poison of all or the best antidote against a system that is already chaotic, and the sheep in slaughterhouse are panicking!

a reply to: TrueBrit

What he did do was educate these paid actors and ignorant hippies without being silenced for longer than Ive seen anyone else on the street so far.

They stopped and let him talk, OP was right in that sense, he did have the block stunned/silenced.