Trump's Twitter is the best thing that has happened to Republicans

This election showed social media can be more powerful than liberal mainstream media. The Liberal media threw the kitchen sink at Trump yet he still won. He did so through Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.

There are a lot of popular Conservatives on social media sites and the Republicans need to start a Social Media Network that pushes stories and drives the coverage. Liberals do this all the time.

The stories will start out on Politico, Huffington Pst and Slate and eventually be on CNN, MSNBC and ABC, NBC and CBS. Sometimes it will be the same story almost word for word.

Look at the recount story. It started with a story saying Hillary's Lawyers were pushing her to challenge the election through a recount. Hillary knew she would look like a hypocrite if she did it and surprise, Jill Stein pops up and raises more money than she did her entire campaign.

Artificial Intelligence predicted Trump's win based on social media engagements.

Using an artificial intelligence algorithm that mined social media, MogIA predicted Trump would win when almost no one else did.

"If Trump loses, it will defy the data trend for the first time in the last 12 years since internet engagement began in full earnest," Rai wrote in a report sent to CNBC on October 28. Not that anyone was listening. Rai also pointed out that Trump had managed to overtake even Barrack Obama's engagement number in 2008 by 25 percent.

www.zdnet.com...

Look at these numbers:

On Facebook, Donald Trump collected a 208,099,876 Facebook engagements and 12 million Facebook fans. Hillary Clinton, who spent early 2016 fending off Bernie Sanders while Trump consolidated support, attracted 72 million engagements and 7.9 million Facebook fans. Her slick mostly image-based campaign won urban voters, but Trump’s grassroots, raw content crowdsourced from rallies was a bigger hit with his fans.

On Twitter, Trump stayed ahead with 89,459,006 total engagements to Hillary’s 41,572,396.

If the general election follows the same pattern as the primaries, the social media data collected indicates that Donald Trump will be the next President.

medium.com...

The election was a big suprise to the media but not AI.

Republicans can learn from Trump and Twitter. Just look at the news coverage now. Just about every story about Trump is negative but when you go back to Obama's transition it was as if he walked on water if you listened to the media.

Now that you've let the cat out of the bag, he'll be getting banned for sure!

his twitter can cause international nuclear boogaloo now.

it was cute and everything.

but i feel we will be seeing alot of $###posting against SNL, and alec baldwin in our future.

>>best timeline

The media wants Trump to stop tweeting. Twitter allows Trump to speak past them and drive the news cycle.

KEEP TWEETING TRUMP!

From Donald Trump's Twitter!

Sorry folks, but if I would have relied on the Fake News of CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, washpost or nytimes, I would have had ZERO chance winning WH

twitter.com...

I agree 110%!!

The Media wants Trump to stop using Twitter because he can talk past them. The other day Jake Tapper was complaining about Trump sending out messages to over 100 million followers across these platforms.

The Republican Party is filled with idiots if they don't realize that they now have a way to push back against the Liberal media and shape the narrative through a social media network.

Think of how past GOP candidates were defined and put into a box. John McCain went from a Maverick the media loved because he bashed Republicans to Mud. They defined him as an ill tempered grumpy old man. They defined Mitt Romney as Scrooge. a rich guy who wanted to fire everybody.

If Trump or Romney had Trump's social media presence they could have pushed back. The media couldn't define Trump and because of social media he did the defining with everything from Little Marco to Crooked Hillary!

STAY ON TWITTER TRUMP!!

That press conference shows the media is obsessed with Trup's tweet's and that's a good thing.

Usually the Republican is breaking his/her neck trying to respond to the media now Trump takes 5 minutes to Tweet and the media spends 3 days responding.

The key is, they can't stand that President Trump has over 110 MILLION FOLLOWERS over these different platforms so they can't shape the narrative.

He IS...

He's the LAST gasp of an aging electorate! America by the numbers is far more centrist than right-wingers WANT you to believe!!! They just yell louder!

how many of those followers are bots?

www.newsweek.com...

my point being, i dont have twitter but im thinking about getting one to follow don, that is not to say I am a fan...at all.

to guage popularity by social media followers is asinine.

originally posted by: veracity
how many of those followers are bots?

www.newsweek.com...

my point being, i dont have twitter but im thinking about getting one to follow don, that is not to say I am a fan...at all.

to guage popularity by social media followers is asinine.

You can BUY twitter followers very, very CHEAPLY. Many Celebrities DO...

Remember...Trump disguised HIMSELF as his publicist:

calls from Trump’s Manhattan office that resulted in conversations with “John Miller” or “John Barron” — public-relations men who sound precisely like Trump himself — who indeed are Trump, masquerading as an unusually helpful and boastful advocate for himself, according to the journalists and several of Trump’s top aides.

LINK

Would NOT surprise me if he PAID for followers...

originally posted by: veracity
how many of those followers are bots?

www.newsweek.com...

my point being, i dont have twitter but im thinking about getting one to follow don, that is not to say I am a fan...at all.

to guage popularity by social media followers is asinine.

Nope, not bots!

If they were bots Artificial Intelligence Systems couldn't have predicted a Trump victory and they have been tracking social engagement for years now.

If they were bots, Trump wouldn't have 279 million total engagements across these platforms with Hillary only 79 million.

If you could buy social engagements, Hillary raised 1.2 billion dollars yet she couldn't buy enough to get past 79 million total engagements!

originally posted by: neoholographic

originally posted by: veracity
how many of those followers are bots?

www.newsweek.com...

my point being, i dont have twitter but im thinking about getting one to follow don, that is not to say I am a fan...at all.

to guage popularity by social media followers is asinine.

Nope, not bots!

If they were bots Artificial Intelligence Systems couldn't have predicted a Trump victory and they have been tracking social engagement for years now.

If they were bots, Trump wouldn't have 279 million total engagements across these platforms with Hillary only 79 million.

If you could buy social engagements, Hillary raised 1.2 billion dollars yet she couldn't buy enough to get past 79 million total engagements!

a deflection of easily found factual info...completely expected