Democratic heads roll after video shows agitators planted at Trump rallies

Two Democrat "strategists" have exited the Clinton Campaign after they got exposed.

One was fired and one (a convicted felon) quit.

These two were implicated when they were caught on video talking about vote fraud and how planted operatives were/are at Trump events.

The one that quit is the Husband of a U.S. Congressperson from Illinois.

We know a few people quit from exposures right before the Democrat Convention in July.

I bet many more "lesser" known people are gone or shoved to the backburners too.

Democrats can't afford this kind of arrogance and incompetence this late in the game.


Democratic heads roll after video shows agitators planted at Trump rallies

Two top Democratic strategists have exited the presidential campaign after explosive undercover videos showed them discussing voter fraud and their roles in planting paid agitators at campaign events for Republican candidate Donald Trump.

Robert Creamer, founder of Democracy Advocates and the husband of Rep. Janice D. Schakowsky, Illinois Democrat, stepped down from the campaign Tuesday, a day after Scott Foval was fired from his post as national field director of Americans United for Change.

Mr. Trump, who has long complained of a “rigged” election system, said at a Tuesday rally in Colorado that the video released by the conservative group Project Veritas Action confirmed his suspicions of Democrat-sponsored political chicanery.

a reply to: xuenchen

The two main guys in the Project Veritas 1 videos. Guess that gives the video serious credibility.

a reply to: xuenchen

Bob Creamer didn't "quit" because he was exposed or implicated. He stepped back because he said he didn't want to be a distraction.

www.cnn.com...

"I am unwilling to become a distraction to the important task of electing Hilary Clinton, and defeating Donald Trump in the upcoming election," Creamer said in a statement. "As a result I have indicated to the Democratic National Committee that I am stepping back from my responsibilities working with the campaign."

Creamer added that "contrary to the outrageous claims of the notorious right wing blogger James O'Keefe, we have always adhered to the highest standards of transparency and legality in our work for the DNC."

He also confirms that the conversations in the videos where "hypothetical conversations", just as I supposed they were and that were confirmed in the latest video today. These conversations and "plans" were brought up and suggested by the fake donor put forth by O'Keefe.

He also denied that any of the schemes in the "hypothetical conversations" recorded for the video ever took place. "We regret the unprofessional and careless hypothetical conversations that were captured on hidden cameras of a regional contractor for our firm, and he is no longer working with us," he said. "While none of the schemes described in the conversations every took place, these conversations do not at all reflect the values of Democracy Partners."

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: xuenchen

The two main guys in the Project Veritas 1 videos. Guess that gives the video serious credibility.

Not really.

Foval was fired because he is an idiot and was already fired from another organization.

Bob Creamer is stepping back because he doesn't want this to be a distraction in the election.

You see, these people know how to handle a hit job...they don't go on twitter rants or make fun of women's looks who have accused a candidate of sexual assault.

a reply to: kruphix

Sure.

His word is good isn't it.

CNN forgot to tell you ........

Husband's bank fraud and tax evasion convictions

On March 11, 2004, Creamer, the executive director of the Illinois Public Action Fund, was indicted in federal court on 16 counts of bank fraud involving three alleged check-kiting schemes in the mid-1990s, leading several banks to experience shortfalls of at least $2.3 million.

In August 2005, Creamer pleaded guilty to one count of failure to collect withholding tax, and bank fraud for writing checks with insufficient funds. All of the money was repaid. Schakowsky was not accused of any wrongdoing. Schakowsky served on the organization's board during the time the crimes occurred, and Schakowsky signed the IRS filings along with her husband. The U.S. district judge noted no one suffered "out of pocket losses," and Creamer acted not out of greed but in an effort to keep his community action group going without cutting programs, though Creamer paid his own $100,000 salary with fraudulently obtained funds. On April 5, 2006, Creamer was sentenced to five months in prison and 11 months of house arrest. Creamer served his five-month incarceration at the Federal Correction Institute in Terre Haute, Indiana and was released on November 3, 2006.

Robert Creamer

a reply to: kruphix

This is called spin.

In actuality, the action that is in direct consequence to the video that he is "stepping back" from his responsibilities.

He knows that and is just attempting to put the best face on as possible.

originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: xuenchen

Bob Creamer didn't "quit" because he was exposed or implicated. He stepped back because he said he didn't want to be a distraction.

www.cnn.com...

"I am unwilling to become a distraction to the important task of electing Hilary Clinton, and defeating Donald Trump in the upcoming election," Creamer said in a statement. "As a result I have indicated to the Democratic National Committee that I am stepping back from my responsibilities working with the campaign."

Creamer added that "contrary to the outrageous claims of the notorious right wing blogger James O'Keefe, we have always adhered to the highest standards of transparency and legality in our work for the DNC."

He also confirms that the conversations in the videos where "hypothetical conversations", just as I supposed they were and that were confirmed in the latest video today. These conversations and "plans" were brought up and suggested by the fake donor put forth by O'Keefe.

He also denied that any of the schemes in the "hypothetical conversations" recorded for the video ever took place. "We regret the unprofessional and careless hypothetical conversations that were captured on hidden cameras of a regional contractor for our firm, and he is no longer working with us," he said. "While none of the schemes described in the conversations every took place, these conversations do not at all reflect the values of Democracy Partners."

Please "quit" speading ignorance on ATS...

a reply to: kruphix

You see, these people know how to handle a hit job...they don't go on twitter rants or make fun of women's looks who have accused a candidate of sexual assault.

This is called deflection. Generally and indication that you don't have a response to the topic in question.

a reply to: kruphix


Right. And just like the side you obviously support, you all know how to squirm right out of a sticky situation. Good job covering for your fellow democrat agitators.

Face it, they were caught red handed and appropriately responded by lying or quitting.

Creamer and Foval weren't speaking "hypothetically". They were actually admitting to committing crimes against people and protests. Get over it. Those democrats can't win unless they cheat.

Go to open.whitehouse.gov... Search for Robert Creamer. Looks like he has visited there on numerous occasions.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: kruphix

You see, these people know how to handle a hit job...they don't go on twitter rants or make fun of women's looks who have accused a candidate of sexual assault.

This is called deflection. Generally and indication that you don't have a response to the topic in question.

It's not deflection, it kills the issue.

The video was about Bob Creamer and Scott Foval.

Foval is just dumb, and got fired like he deserved.

Creamer actually didn't say or do anything bad in the video. He actually told Foval to stay far away from the scheme the fake donor was talking about.

But with him stepping back, it makes the video completely irrelevant.

originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: xuenchen

Bob Creamer didn't "quit" because he was exposed or implicated. He stepped back because he said he didn't want to be a distraction.

www.cnn.com...

"I am unwilling to become a distraction to the important task of electing Hilary Clinton, and defeating Donald Trump in the upcoming election," Creamer said in a statement. "As a result I have indicated to the Democratic National Committee that I am stepping back from my responsibilities working with the campaign."

Creamer added that "contrary to the outrageous claims of the notorious right wing blogger James O'Keefe, we have always adhered to the highest standards of transparency and legality in our work for the DNC."

He also confirms that the conversations in the videos where "hypothetical conversations", just as I supposed they were and that were confirmed in the latest video today. These conversations and "plans" were brought up and suggested by the fake donor put forth by O'Keefe.

He also denied that any of the schemes in the "hypothetical conversations" recorded for the video ever took place. "We regret the unprofessional and careless hypothetical conversations that were captured on hidden cameras of a regional contractor for our firm, and he is no longer working with us," he said. "While none of the schemes described in the conversations every took place, these conversations do not at all reflect the values of Democracy Partners."

Baaahahaaahaahahaha! Wait wait wait.....AAAAhhhahahaaahahaha!

Seriously? The husband of a politician that has already been convicted of fraud and tax evasion and you believe he is just stepping back for the good of Hillary?

COME ON DUDE!!! You have got to be kidding me with these kinds of posts.

probably being paid to reel in minority's because felons aren't even allowed to vote

a reply to: kruphix

It's not deflection, it kills the issue.

It is deflection. Name the sexual assault in the OP.

But with him stepping back, it makes the video completely irrelevant.

Was he going to step back before the video? Have evidence?

a reply to: havok

Creamer and Foval weren't speaking "hypothetically". They were actually admitting to committing crimes against people and protests. Get over it. Those democrats can't win unless they cheat.

If you watched today's video, you will see that it was the fake donor sent in by O'keefe who was the one that brought up the scheme to use his businesses in different states to register out of state voters.

O'Keefe even says during the narration that they were "brainstorming" about the plan the fake donor brought up.

After the fake donor talked to Creamer, Creamer called Foval and told him he isn't touching it with a ten foot pole because it sounded like a voter fraud scheme.

Now you tell me, what does that implicate Creamer in? Denying to be part of a voter fraud scheme that was suggested by O'Keefe's fake donor?

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: kruphix

You see, these people know how to handle a hit job...they don't go on twitter rants or make fun of women's looks who have accused a candidate of sexual assault.

This is called deflection. Generally and indication that you don't have a response to the topic in question.

It's not deflection, it kills the issue.

The video was about Bob Creamer and Scott Foval.

Foval is just dumb, and got fired like he deserved.

Creamer actually didn't say or do anything bad in the video. He actually told Foval to stay far away from the scheme the fake donor was talking about.

But with him stepping back, it makes the video completely irrelevant.

"Irrelevant" when they go viral each day...and 8 remain?

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: kruphix

It's not deflection, it kills the issue.

It is deflection. Name the sexual assault in the OP.

But with him stepping back, it makes the video completely irrelevant.

Was he going to step back before the video? Have evidence?

Why would he step back before the video, that makes no sense.

And me comparing how the Democrats are handling this in comparison to how Trump is currently handling the sexual assault accusations isn't deflection, it's a comparison on the correct way to handle something and the wrong way to handle something.

originally posted by: Granite

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: kruphix

You see, these people know how to handle a hit job...they don't go on twitter rants or make fun of women's looks who have accused a candidate of sexual assault.

This is called deflection. Generally and indication that you don't have a response to the topic in question.

It's not deflection, it kills the issue.

The video was about Bob Creamer and Scott Foval.

Foval is just dumb, and got fired like he deserved.

Creamer actually didn't say or do anything bad in the video. He actually told Foval to stay far away from the scheme the fake donor was talking about.

But with him stepping back, it makes the video completely irrelevant.

"Irrelevant" when they go viral each day...and 8 remain?

Yes, irrelevant because your two main subjects of the videos have already been addressed.

This is how you get out in front of a hit piece.

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: xuenchen

The two main guys in the Project Veritas 1 videos. Guess that gives the video serious credibility.

Not really.

Foval was fired because he is an idiot and was already fired from another organization.

Bob Creamer is stepping back because he doesn't want this to be a distraction in the election.

You see, these people know how to handle a hit job...they don't go on twitter rants or make fun of women's looks who have accused a candidate of sexual assault.

Step down, fired, resigned...who cares. They are gone. Gone because of their actions otherwise they would still be there. Who wants to find another job when your candidate is about to win the highest office. You are kidding yourself.

You meant:

Democratic heads sent on vacation after video shows agitators planted at Trump rallies.

Their work is done here. After all.