It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Take human shields of women and children into a hostile confrontation.
The pipeline needs security,
these are pre terror attacks designed to break down security so that infrastructure can be sabotaged at any time.
Those Indian groups need to be thoroughly investigated to ascertain what foreign enemy influence they have succumbed to.
The Mercs should be investigated along with the oil companies they are working for. The dogs should have been shot when they attacked and their handlers beaten with in an inch of their life.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
This is just a taste of what is to come I think.
Private security firms being given the green light to behave in whatever manner they see fit, as long as they disperse any protest, even peaceful ones.
Being paid, no doubt handsomely, to attack anyone questioning the morality and environmental impact of such projects.
Police for the people at the top, private security for the projects they give the nod to, particularly controversial projects.
You go through local government to protest any projects that their districts oversee. There are plenty of cases where local opposition to projects taken through legal avenues have succeeded. Across the whole nation people successfully opposed having nuclear waste sites or even having nuclear waste travel by rail through their districts. This wasn't done by mobbing security or taking up terrorist tactics.
originally posted by: buster2010
The Mercs should be investigated along with the oil companies they are working for. The dogs should have been shot when they attacked and their handlers beaten with in an inch of their life.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: RainbowPhoenix
You do know that private security companies have been in existence like...forever, right? And have literally, quite literally, operated in the continental US and pretty much every other country on the planet, for pretty much forever? Private security runs the gamut of "observe and report" rent-a-cops to fully licensed armed security with arrest powers. Acting as if this is some kind of new thing is pretty mind boggling.
And there isn't really much of a media blackout on this. There's literally dozens of articles from MSM sources about the event. Just most of them speak to both sides story of what went down a wee bit more than free thought project does and don't go ham so hard on the buzzwords. Strange concept, I know.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
This is just a taste of what is to come I think.
Private security firms being given the green light to behave in whatever manner they see fit, as long as they disperse any protest, even peaceful ones.
Being paid, no doubt handsomely, to attack anyone questioning the morality and environmental impact of such projects.
Police for the people at the top, private security for the projects they give the nod to, particularly controversial projects.
You go through local government to protest any projects that their districts oversee. There are plenty of cases where local opposition to projects taken through legal avenues have succeeded. Across the whole nation people successfully opposed having nuclear waste sites or even having nuclear waste travel by rail through their districts. This wasn't done by mobbing security or taking up terrorist tactics.
Terrorist tactics? Man you really have been sucked in by the media talk. Anybody protesting outside of the relevant beaurocratic red tape, are terrorists. That has really made me LOL!!
I've read that the protesters broke thru the gates and assaulted the security and that no protesters were hurt but a couple of security personal and two dogs were injured by protesters, like shamrock said the video has been turned over to local authorities.
originally posted by: roadgravel
It's working. Citizens who now believe peaceful protests should be dealt violence and the Constitution that support freedom such as protest is to be ignored.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
This is just a taste of what is to come I think.
Private security firms being given the green light to behave in whatever manner they see fit, as long as they disperse any protest, even peaceful ones.
Being paid, no doubt handsomely, to attack anyone questioning the morality and environmental impact of such projects.
Police for the people at the top, private security for the projects they give the nod to, particularly controversial projects.
You go through local government to protest any projects that their districts oversee. There are plenty of cases where local opposition to projects taken through legal avenues have succeeded. Across the whole nation people successfully opposed having nuclear waste sites or even having nuclear waste travel by rail through their districts. This wasn't done by mobbing security or taking up terrorist tactics.
Terrorist tactics? Man you really have been sucked in by the media talk. Anybody protesting outside of the relevant beaurocratic red tape, are terrorists. That has really made me LOL!!
Here is another more true representation of the story already posted here by Thesaneone,
I've read that the protesters broke thru the gates and assaulted the security and that no protesters were hurt but a couple of security personal and two dogs were injured by protesters, like shamrock said the video has been turned over to local authorities.
Yes, terrorist tactics cut and dried, open and shut case.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
This is just a taste of what is to come I think.
Private security firms being given the green light to behave in whatever manner they see fit, as long as they disperse any protest, even peaceful ones.
Being paid, no doubt handsomely, to attack anyone questioning the morality and environmental impact of such projects.
Police for the people at the top, private security for the projects they give the nod to, particularly controversial projects.
You go through local government to protest any projects that their districts oversee. There are plenty of cases where local opposition to projects taken through legal avenues have succeeded. Across the whole nation people successfully opposed having nuclear waste sites or even having nuclear waste travel by rail through their districts. This wasn't done by mobbing security or taking up terrorist tactics.
Terrorist tactics? Man you really have been sucked in by the media talk. Anybody protesting outside of the relevant beaurocratic red tape, are terrorists. That has really made me LOL!!
Here is another more true representation of the story already posted here by Thesaneone,
I've read that the protesters broke thru the gates and assaulted the security and that no protesters were hurt but a couple of security personal and two dogs were injured by protesters, like shamrock said the video has been turned over to local authorities.
Yes, terrorist tactics cut and dried, open and shut case.
Without any links to the quote posted?
Open and shut, my dear Sherlock?
You really crack me up man, please continue, please don't stop. Ha ha ha.
originally posted by: thinline
a reply to: RainbowPhoenix
What kind of parents take kids to a protest?
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
This is just a taste of what is to come I think.
Private security firms being given the green light to behave in whatever manner they see fit, as long as they disperse any protest, even peaceful ones.
Being paid, no doubt handsomely, to attack anyone questioning the morality and environmental impact of such projects.
Police for the people at the top, private security for the projects they give the nod to, particularly controversial projects.
You go through local government to protest any projects that their districts oversee. There are plenty of cases where local opposition to projects taken through legal avenues have succeeded. Across the whole nation people successfully opposed having nuclear waste sites or even having nuclear waste travel by rail through their districts. This wasn't done by mobbing security or taking up terrorist tactics.
Terrorist tactics? Man you really have been sucked in by the media talk. Anybody protesting outside of the relevant beaurocratic red tape, are terrorists. That has really made me LOL!!
Here is another more true representation of the story already posted here by Thesaneone,
I've read that the protesters broke thru the gates and assaulted the security and that no protesters were hurt but a couple of security personal and two dogs were injured by protesters, like shamrock said the video has been turned over to local authorities.
Yes, terrorist tactics cut and dried, open and shut case.
Without any links to the quote posted?
Open and shut, my dear Sherlock?
You really crack me up man, please continue, please don't stop. Ha ha ha.
You can't even be bothered to read the thread can you? If you had you would have seen the quote was from a response in this very thread a few posts up from my response. Lol, you need a link to scroll up a few posts? That is pathetic.