It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Small teams of Western countries’ special forces have been on the ground in eastern and western Libya for months. Last month France said three of its soldiers had been killed south of the eastern city of Benghazi, where they had been conducting intelligence operations.
By Brandon Turbeville
In an effort to bolster a weak and largely impotent U.N.-backed government in Libya, the United States has launched a bombing campaign against ISIS fighters in the city of Sirte. After having destroyed Libya and rendered what was once the country with the highest living standards in Africa to a desert of chaos and barbarism, the United States is now once again bombing the embattled nation. This time, however, the bombing is under the guise of “defeating ISIS” so that the limp GNA (Government of National Accord) can establish control over the country and, obviously, so that it might be able to translate and enforce the decisions made by the West into real results inside Libya.
Unlike in Syria, where U.S. bombing strikes are carried out mainly against Syrian military positions, civilians, or simply wasted in the desert (although sometimes ISIS targets are indeed bombed in order to encourage and force the fighters into moving from or ceding territory – terrorist herding), the bombing in Libya appears to actually be directed at ISIS targets. This is because the anti-imperialist figure of Ghaddafi is now gone and, in his place, is a puppet government more amenable to Western dictates. Thus, there is no more need, at least for now, of Islamic radicals to be used as a proxy force against the Libyan government.
originally posted by: projectvxn
The claim of no boots on the ground is NEVER true.
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: AmericanRealist
Look, I'm a soldier. I was made one and I will die with that pride.
I would go anywhere to do what needed to be done on the orders of civilian leadership who govern my actions as a soldier(now a former soldier mind you...But things don't change).
That said, I don't have to like it. I don't have to agree with it.
Now that I'm out you can bet I'm going to speak about it. What we did in Libya was international crime.
The EU and the US have a lot to answer for on that front.
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Ohanka
I think somewhere this is part of the reason for Brexit as well.
Being taken to war on the whims of the EU is not something that I think would sit right with many regular Brits.
In the US we have a binary political system that makes the people justify one action over the other depending on what color team they play for.
originally posted by: Ohanka
Overthrowing Gaddafi with foreign mercenaries and a bombing campaign sure looks like a good idea now, right guys?!
People said this would happen, it was completely ignored. Low and behold exactly what was said would happen, did. Total anarchy and seemingly endless civil war.
"No Fly Zone". Security Council sure won't be falling for that trick again.
When will NATO stop acting like the "World Police"?