Terrorist Shooting in Munich?

Spanish TV said attackers yell anti immigrant things

www.mirror.co.uk...

Clad in all black clothing, the man wanders across the roof of the building shouting at others, at one point apparently declaring “I’m German”.

Video in there

a reply to: Power_Semi

It isn't one or two, it's well over 50% of them.

Is that why some of their countries have women heads of state?
How do you know how 800 million people feel?

a reply to: burdman30ott6

Its worst than that.

Here is where THEY SHOULD GO TO WAR AGAINST

ISIS

They should have done that 2 years ago

I mean a real war

Its not a war against Islam. Its a war against ISIS....Obama’s a moron or worst complicit

Arrest the psychiatrist for these MKUltra patsys. Let me know what medications they were on.
a reply to: Power_Semi

They are reporting he yelled against Turks.

a reply to: Willtell

You mean like the one we did v AQ and the Taliban?

How did that work out for us?

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Willtell

You mean like the one we did v AQ and the Taliban?

How did that work out for us?

I said a REAL WAR

The ones you talk about are fake wars

There going to do it eventually, its inevitable

a reply to: Willtell

I don't disagree with you. The 2 wars the US has fought in the middle east since 9/11 have not seemed like wars we fought to win. "Kinder, gentler" warfare doesn't win wars, period.

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Willtell

You mean like the one we did v AQ and the Taliban?

How did that work out for us?

The issue was pulling the troops out before colonising the country and establishing western civilisation. Nazis were bad people, fifty years after wiping out millions of them and re educating the german folk they are now civilised to the point of sillyness. The troops should have stayed, leadership taken out and all the madrassas closed down and the new born children having their brains rewired. Problem solved, job done

a reply to: Willtell

How were they fake wars? Or is this more of the kid gloves stuff were when did bomb them enough...
a reply to: ufoorbhunter
Well for one Iraq didn't want use there anymore.
And two, how much longer did we need to stay? We had been there for 10+ years and spent trillions of dollars on it, how much more lives and money needed to be spent?

a reply to: Power_Semi

Seems like every country that showed even a little respect for Putin and Russia is seeing terror attacks, coups and psycho axe people.

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Willtell


Well for one Iraq didn't want use there anymore.
And two, how much longer did we need to stay? We had been there for 10+ years and spent trillions of dollars on it, how much more lives and money needed to be spent?

What Iraq wants and what Iraq gets is none of their business as a defeated and occupied state. You Americans invaded Iraq, once you did it you had to make a proper job of remodelling that society. You once did the same to the Germans and the Japs.To THIS VERY DAY you still occupy those states having hundreds of thousands of military personnel there. By doing it long term the USA managed to turn these war like countries into the most sedate non violent nation on our planet. Truth be told if you are going in you go for the long term if you want real results. Fact is you pulled out after ten years and left a total mess which has been filled by IS. USA should still be there and probably there for another fifty years from now if the job was going to be done properly

a reply to: ufoorbhunter

We came in as liberators, that kinda changes things. We never defeated them or occupied them.
Our troops would have had no protection with no stay of force agreement, and it would have turned into a war against Iraq.

USA should still be there and probably there for another fifty years from now if the job was going to be done properly

I don't think so at all, we can't afford it for one and two we have seen it doesn't accomplish anything.
Jap and Germany are hardly similar situations, they have no comparison here.

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: ufoorbhunter


I don't think so at all, we can't afford it for one and two we have seen it doesn't accomplish anything.
Jap and Germany are hardly similar situations, they have no comparison here.

But you invaded those countries! This wasn't a pull in to McDonalds for a burger, the USA invaded the Middle East. I am not criticising this action, the fact is if you do invade you can't just pull out after a few thousand days and expect a place of peace and serenity. USA should still be there to re educate the masses, you needed to overhaul the education system and make the children like your own. You pulled out to early and left a vacuum which has been filled by Islamic State. If you go in you do the job properly like you did with the Germans and Japanese, you stay until the old generation have died off and the new generation watches Hollywood. Subdued peaceful population achieved

a reply to: ufoorbhunter

We didn't invade Iraq... We came in to liberate it!
It was not a war vs Iraq but vs the terrorist groups occupying it.

If you go in you do the job properly like you did with the Germans and Japanese, you stay until the old generation have died off and the new generation watches Hollywood.

This isn't Germany or Japan, this is the war torn ME that has been dealing with war someway or the other for the past 30 years at least!
It is not the same thing, that comparison holds no water.
And even if it was, can you show were we overhauled their respective educations and societies?

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: ufoorbhunter

We didn't invade Iraq... We came in to liberate it!

Are you being serious? Liberate it? This sounds like Mr Adolf in 1938 talking about liberating the Sudetenland.

Saddam had many suppoters in Iraq just like Hitler had in central Europe. You needed to stay for the long term in Iraq to make it a peaceful state, fact is the whole region is a failed region. The vacuum created by removing Saddam has been filled by Islamic State. Sure Saddam was a big noise but he didn't let the cat out of the bag. The space has been filled by an evil IS that is being felt all around the world, last week Nice and next week somewhere for sure. By leaving to soon the USA made things not better than Saddam but things x1000 worse.

originally posted by: imod02

originally posted by: Misterlondon

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: Misterlondon
It probably is but why do people instantly jump to that conclusion without any facts..
Of yeah I forgot.. media programming.. Evil islamists..

If you have 4 pets, a goldfish, a parakeet, a Mastiff, and a small cat and everyday you come home to find a small pile of cat crap on the rug you don't blame the fish, bird, or dog... It's patently obvious who is behind 99.9% of terrorist attacks in the world today. If the Islamists and their appologists bristle at that stating of the obvious, perhaps they should work from inside to change their own reality instead of trying to convince the world to lie to itself and not immediately think of islamofascist terror when these attacks happened.

Look.. I'll give you some examples..
Are all gypsies scum that rip people of?.. No...
Do all Chinese people eat cats and dogs... No
Do all black people, smoke weed, rob and commit gun crime people... No
Are all Japanese people law abiding.. No
Do all Irish people drink heavily.. No
Do all Americans eat pizza and burgers everyday.. No
Di all baits have bad teeth.. No

These are stereotypes.. Do all Muslims kill people.. No..

Your example of the animals is a moot point because cats naturally hunt and eat all the animals you mention.. All Muslims do not naturally commit terrorist attacks..
You are just a racist..

And yet the people killing and raping and mutilating in Europe are muslims

No one else in Europe comit these crimes? Wow, alert the statisticians, since they are all wrong then.

originally posted by: ufoorbhunter

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: ufoorbhunter

We didn't invade Iraq... We came in to liberate it!

Are you being serious? Liberate it? This sounds like Mr Adolf in 1938 talking about liberating the Sudetenland.

Saddam had many suppoters in Iraq just like Hitler had in central Europe. You needed to stay for the long term in Iraq to make it a peaceful state, fact is the whole region is a failed region. The vacuum created by removing Saddam has been filled by Islamic State. Sure Saddam was a big noise but he didn't let the cat out of the bag. The space has been filled by an evil IS that is being felt all around the world, last week Nice and next week somewhere for sure. By leaving to soon the USA made things not better than Saddam but things x1000 worse.

You are right. We went once, under H.W. That should have been enough. But no, we go back under his idiot son. The US added greatly to what was an existing mess.

a reply to: ufoorbhunter

Are you being serious? Liberate it?

Yes, I am.
"We've always said it could be days, weeks, or months and we don't know. And I don't think you need a timetable. What you really need to know is it's going to end and it's going to end with the Iraqi people liberated."
Donald Rumsfeld, March 30, 2003.

"Thanks to the United States, there are now 15 million Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq liberated by your courageous leadership and decision to liberate us, Mr. President."
President Talabani of Iraq, September 13, 2005.

"Iraq is free, and today we are joined by representatives of a liberated country."
George W. Bush, Sept. 23, 2003.
www.prisonplanet.com...

So again, when you go in under the guise of liberation, you can't turn around and occupy once the nation wants you out.
www.politifact.com...
So yeah lets try that all over again, but lets make sure to take the kids gloves off this time and kill more people and spend more money.

Everyone is raining eyebrows here in Iran as the German police claims that the shooter is from Iranian German roots

First Iranian jihadi ever is now introduced to the world??

Not suspicious at all.

RIP to the victims