*****Republican National Convention thread. Let the games begin.*****

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: UKTruth


Hey, man, I thought you would agree. I'm saying Trump does have ability to change things. He's not status quo. If you're into would-be dictators and tyrants-- and you're white--- he could bring about the change you're looking for.

Propaganda technique number 1.

www.uvm.edu...

This is looking more and more like a Cruz effort - the states were led by the caucuses where Cruz won under less than clear circumstances, Iowa and Colorado.

a reply to: spiritualzombie

Keep lapping up the mainstream bull# and sensationalism. Gotta keep those parasites paid after all

originally posted by: Sillyolme

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: olaru12

What are Trump critics complaining about ?

Clinton's victory is assured.

You just got your first star from me. Yay.

Take it back.

Ixnay on the tarsays.

originally posted by: CynConcepts

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: CynConcepts

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: onequestion

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

Either way this sends a message of complete disunity.

I would expect that when a candidate comes along claiming to put a stop to the status quo, which is exactly why we're voting for Trump..

Trump is part of and has taken advantage of the status quo. If elected, he would fall right in line like everyone else does.

If you are looking for a president that is going to really make some changes, neither candidate is worth consideration.

I think that is speculation. What we know is that Clinton represents the corrupt establishment and Trump is an unknown politically. I am sure he WILL fall into line on certain issues, but I am not so sure that he will give up some of his major platform promises.

If Tony Schwartz is correct in his own personal assessment of Trump, it sounds like Trump will lose patience with all of his advisors and only seek his own good/bad publicity! Have you even read the most recent interview with Tony Schwartz? It makes you realize Trump is exactly what he is...sound bites and no substance! Americans need to stop pinning their hopes and dreams on him and realize that he may more than likely leave you pissed off more than all of the Obama voters felt about their dreams of hope and change!

I still won't vote for Clinton, but damn sure I won't for Trump!

I am taking a broader approach - one thing I have seen clearly during this cycle is that the division that exists creates a lot of bias and misinformation.

Broader approach? What does that even mean? In order for one to deny ignorance they should look at all the facts that are provided. Good and bad. Afterwards, they can make a personal decision based on their perspective of the accumulative information provided. Naturally, why so many hold such disdain for Clinton. Have you even ready the recent full detailed article from Tony Schwartz? You may be able to enlighten others on why they should not give any credit to this article.
Source Link for those who wish to deny ignorance.

Meh, I read it.

Just some guy that made a ton of money back in the day off of Trump.

He has it wrong on top of his sour grapes, bringing up the same old "immigrants are rapists" BS.

Deny ignorance, indeed.

so, according to tony schwartz trump is no different than any other politician except that other politicians are better at hiding their narcissistic,sociopathic tendencies,I would attribute that to the fact that most politicians are lawyers whereas trump is a businessman.

originally posted by: UKTruth
This is looking more and more like a Cruz effort - the states were led by the caucuses where Cruz won under less than clear circumstances, Iowa and Colorado.

Iowa pulled out of the group.

The group tried 3 times and lost.

They are down to 5 states now.

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: UKTruth
This is looking more and more like a Cruz effort - the states were led by the caucuses where Cruz won under less than clear circumstances, Iowa and Colorado.

Iowa pulled out of the group.

The group tried 3 times and lost.

They are down to 5 states now.

Is Trump even there yet?

I bet he is eating this up.

originally posted by: onequestion

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: UKTruth
This is looking more and more like a Cruz effort - the states were led by the caucuses where Cruz won under less than clear circumstances, Iowa and Colorado.

Iowa pulled out of the group.

The group tried 3 times and lost.

They are down to 5 states now.

Is Trump even there yet?

I bet he is eating this up.

He is in spirit.

originally posted by: onequestion

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: UKTruth
This is looking more and more like a Cruz effort - the states were led by the caucuses where Cruz won under less than clear circumstances, Iowa and Colorado.

Iowa pulled out of the group.

The group tried 3 times and lost.

They are down to 5 states now.

Is Trump even there yet?

I bet he is eating this up.

Haven't heard if he is.

Probably on approach now, if not close.

I haven't seen anything from outside the venue, tho.

originally posted by: UKTruth
This is looking more and more like a Cruz effort - the states were led by the caucuses where Cruz won under less than clear circumstances, Iowa and Colorado.

The whole thing is about Cruz.

They will get it out of their systems and all will be forgiven.

a reply to: UKTruth

Agreed - this revolt was likely organized by Cruz. The other day he was stopped to ask about his agreement to speak at the convention, and he seemed like he was blushing, and definitely hiding something. He is not to be trusted. He still believes that he deserved to win. He is not going to give up on this.

If he still speaks at the convention, I wonder what he will say.

a reply to: neo96

Thats arstay in pig Latin ixnay on the arstay .

and No I WON'T TAKE IT BACK.
You're stuck with it so there.
LOL

a reply to: neo96

The accident wasn't that serious.

originally posted by: onequestion

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: UKTruth
This is looking more and more like a Cruz effort - the states were led by the caucuses where Cruz won under less than clear circumstances, Iowa and Colorado.

Iowa pulled out of the group.

The group tried 3 times and lost.

They are down to 5 states now.

Is Trump even there yet?

I bet he is eating this up.

Or mad as hell.

Cruz and Kasich should be expelled from the party for this.

Hopefully neither of them will ever hold public office again. Not after showing this utter contempt for their party, it's supporters and the democratic process.

a reply to: BlueAjah

If he speaks as planned, he will endorse Trump and thank his supporters wholeheartedly.

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: UKTruth
This is looking more and more like a Cruz effort - the states were led by the caucuses where Cruz won under less than clear circumstances, Iowa and Colorado.

Iowa pulled out of the group.

The group tried 3 times and lost.

They are down to 5 states now.

When you read sites like RedState you realise just how sick the die hard Cruz supporters can be.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: BlueAjah

If he speaks as planned, he will endorse Trump and thank his supporters wholeheartedly.

I reckon he will withdraw at the last minute for maximum effect.

a reply to: CynConcepts

realize that he may more than likely leave you pissed off more than all of the Obama voters felt about their dreams of hope and change!
I still won't vote for Clinton, but damn sure I won't for Trump!

It's possible.
Its pathetic isn't it? And really sad.

300,000,000 people and we get these 2 to represent us.

Like someone else said earlier, I think I'll pass on the beer and popcorn and go work on my bunker.....