Insider Claims Inside Knowledge on Clinton Investigation = "Entire Government is Treasonous"

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: MystikMushroom

I think your biases are clouding your judgment with some of your seemingly runaway assumptions.

Soros is far worse than anyone else on the public stage remotely similar. Far worse.

He is more Marxist, globalist and ruthless. And he's mean. Very mean.

I'm sure there's plenty of dirt to go around but Soros is in a league of his own.

Really?

a reply to: schuyler

However, this seems just so familiar. Didn't we have another "Insider" last election who supposedly a disaffected agent for the Dem. He predicted all sorts of stuff was going to happen and Obama's house of cards was about to tumble, then, OMG! Last minute reprieve! It didn't happen! Sentiment here on ATS last time was that we were being played by the blogger who claimed inside access to the inside guy. I forget the blogger--guy with a hat hiding his face. Anyone recollect?

Ulsterman? He had a Washington insider and a Pentagon insider if I remember correctly... something like that.

I always thought it was bogus. Even the comments at the site just reeked of "set up." The "insider" would drop a "hint" that was easily followed up on by the commenters and then they'd all pat themselves on the back for being so clever and "awake." It just came off so bogus to me.

originally posted by: Maverick1
a reply to: WhateverYouSay
Confirmation bias at work. Popular perception seems to see an FBI agent as a middle aged white male by default social programming....


And this poster/whistleblower isn't.

They are, however, rather clever.

You've had to pass enough hoops in order to become an FBI agent in order to know how to compose yourself in serious situations. You think the guy that wants to blow the whistle on something so important is going to say something controversial like "Blacks can be domesticated"?

You're insane.

To clarify... an FBI agent would be aware enough to understand that a comment like that would cause someone like me to doubt his credibility because of that comment. A true whistleblower wants people to believe because why else would they be releasing the info, especially at great risk to themselves. Furthermore the character type of a whistleblower, especially of an FBI law and order type would be to give great consideration to this decision. It would not be arrived at lightly. They would not jeopardise something of so great importance with casual ignorant racism.

Once again I'll state the only thing in that guy's message is the clear main point: The American Government at the highest levels is incredibly corrupt to the point of widespread treason, and the Clinton Foundation is a lodestone for the arch."

Everything else is a potential red herring so it's practically worthless.

a reply to: WhateverYouSay

You misunderstood my point, friend---utterly.


You are 100 percent correct in your first paragraph. No FBI agent is likely to make that sort of statement UNLESS BY DELIBERATION to cause conflict or deflect from who 'he' may be. He stated as much.

The assumption the poster is a 'racist white guy' is a product of your( or my or anyones) own confirmation bias. It feeds into the poster LEADING us in that direction, then placing nonsensical and controversial remarks to divert from what may very well be an Asian female agent, for instance.

See the point logically?

a reply to: WhateverYouSay

Ever think that his comments weren't made for a person like you? If this situation is true, then the serious situation he is in, is whistle blowing on a website. He has to fit into the situation, fit in with someone who could be on that website. From the comments of people who frequent that website, he passed that test.

Now how true is his main message, the Clinton Foundatuon is ohhh sooo evil. I think most people who follow the money, can see where the money leads and a tit for tat relationship.

most of the public supporters being public, because that money flows into their pocket...

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: jimmyx
4chan?....anonymous posters?.....yeah, right....sounds legit to me........NOT.

I agree with you here jimmyx.
4chan has zero credibility.
If it is true, it was the worst place to drop it.

exactly...but, if anyone here quotes Huffington post, you are labeled as a stupid idiot that will believe anything. believe every other "tom, dick, and harry" website or blog, so long as it isn't liberal.

Amen! WAY too many members on both sides of the argument have become all-too-eager rabid consumers of any piece of random dirt they can find on the opposite side's candidate, party, or their perceived agenda, and the vast majority of folks seem to have completely thrown out the need for any credibility in the source department.

4chan guys??!!!? This so-called "insider's" writing style alone should have your bull# sensors going off like mad! Almost certainly nothing more than a run-of-the-mill troll who came up with this bull# in about 15 minutes by simply touching on all of the right-wing blogosphere's favorite topics and conspiracies theories, and pulled all of the # together in a beyond predictable, highly unoriginal "everything you've heard....IS TRUE!" piece of nonsense. I realize that so many folks out there would love every word of this "4chan patriot's" banter to be true, but put your emotion's aside and really use your noggin's. Nothing more here than some "but what if it's real" election year entertainment.

4chan everybody.........4...........chan........

a reply to: Argus100

Not trying to pick on you, but where should someone leaking this sort of thing actually go? Any of the "credible" information peddlers will need to know who you are and you're just going to have to trust that they won't tell anyone. I'd think it's much easier to leave no trace this way, especially if you work in government and have a more solid understanding of how to actually do that. Throwing it in a mainstream forum like 4chan or Reddit is a pretty decent zero-budget idea IMO.

I don't think this is legit either though, totally agree that it seemed to be entirely what /pol/ and ATS people want to hear. Conspiracy-wise, anyway.

a reply to: spite

The thing is, there are no credible information peddlers outside of possibly wikileaks. No major news network would touch this with a ten foot pole especially if it was true, and all the minor networks would be discounted as non-credible or biased.

a reply to: MystikMushroom

My GAWD...if that isn't a bunch of spin doctored bunk I dunno what is!!!

Notice that cute little piece conveniently overlooked and omitted Soros' currency speculation endeavors in 1992 and 1997 which crippled the Bank of England and then the economies of virtually all of SE Asia! That thing makes Soros look like a saint.

What absolute rubbish!

a reply to: boncho

It doesnt take a genius or even a degree to realize the world is in the fast lane of the highway to hell!

Nothing left to do but sit back, relax, and try to enjoy the ride

a reply to: boncho

Can't say I'm too surprised really. But I bet we're still not even deep in to the rabbit hole yet we're almost half way though the year and interesting thing just seems to keep on popping up, each one bigger then the last.

I'm not sure what we'll be left with or be thinking by time the end of the year.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk


It sprinted right past the "happiest time in his life" as well.

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: MystikMushroom

My GAWD...if that isn't a bunch of spin doctored bunk I dunno what is!!!

Notice that cute little piece conveniently overlooked and omitted Soros' currency speculation endeavors in 1992 and 1997 which crippled the Bank of England and then the economies of virtually all of SE Asia! That thing makes Soros look like a saint.

What absolute rubbish!

Anyone with a sliver of intelligence can tell that you can't accurately portray someone with a list of maybe 20 things. You could list all the great things I've done and ignore the crap next to someone else who you are doing the opposite for, and I'm going to look pretty amazing. Would it reflect reality? Hell no. I'm not a corporate puppetmaster, but still, the point stands. It's a ridiculous piece.

originally posted by: WhateverYouSay
I could believe that the Clinton Foundation was extremely corrupt, but this is fake.

He writes,

Blacks are violent and generally impulsive, but they are not all bad. And they can be, for lack of a better term, domesticated.

No FBI leaker is going to say that. I don't care if he believes it, he just won't.

I don't know, much more through situation than inherent nature, but blacks are pretty violent. Impulsive? I'd say the numbers and my personal observations back that up, but it's hard to say. Violent is easy, look at violent crime statistics. Again, it has much more to do with the vast amount of blacks being raised in poverty and crime than anything inherently wrong with them, but still. Nothing he says couldn't be the veiw of a racist FBI agent. If you don't think those exist, you need a reality check. Domesticated, however, is a gross word and I won't defend that. Doesn't mean he can't work the FBI and also believe that's an ok thing to say on an anonymous message board. Also, he wasn't really leaking anything of substantial value. Just kind of saying where things stand with no actual information given of any kind. Pretty shotty whisleblower. Maybe he just wanted to get this off his chest? Anyway, I don't think it's real for a second. I just disagree about the idea that an FBI agent would never say that, especially when speaking from a position of absolute anonymity.

originally posted by: whyamIhere
I have to agree...

From the IRS to possibly the FBI this all stinks.

This is simply the most predictable response by the far right.

First, build a pyramid of BS based on hyperbole and BS and predict a conclusion disconnected from reality.

As the realization sets in that reality will not recognize the mountain of BS you created...whatever you do, do not reconcile the facts...Instead indict reality!!! The FBI and entire government must be involved in a mass conspiracy and cover-up involving thousands of people!!!

All partisanship aside, it is a ridiculous and very desperate propaganda ploy..It fails all standards of logic, probability and reason..

An anonymous forum poster claims a mass conspiracy where the thousands of government employees are coordinating in secret risking prison time to decide the next President...and that is where the right wing has decided to hang it's hat?

No surprise from me. I've been saying this since they got away with Iran/contra. Everything has been downhill since then, bad trade deals, Waco, OKC, first WTC bombing, Kosovo, Whitewater, Travelgate, Mena AR, Chinagate, 9/11, NDAA, PATRIOT ACT, Afghanistan, Iraq, additional 15 Trillion in debt. That's just the short list.

It's gotten to the point of where you can't work inside government (Federal) in any important position unless you are a criminal - ready to take orders that may be illegal or unconstitutional but do them you must or they will expose you for kiddie porn or something equally egregious. Of course the bribes and insider trading make it all very lucrative and I'm sure many who started for the right reasons have been turned to the dark side as it were.

originally posted by: whyamIhere

Deny the Dynasty...Arrest all of them.

Nope...strap them all up in uniform and fly them into Syria to fight ISIS front line...

originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn

There's also this:

I said life exists elsewhere. Some people choose to interpret that as aliens. My protective strategy is posting outrageous caims on /pol/ with no evidence, which is standard protocol and raises no alarms. "fake and gay", just remember

Maybe this "Life existing elsewhere" isn't our little grey or green men/ufo occupants but possibly inter dimensional creatures more akin to angels, demons or the creatures of folklore such as pixies, sprites and nature spirits.

edit on 5-7-2016 by Asktheanimals because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-7-2016 by Asktheanimals because: (no reason given)

a reply to: Maverick1

I never said he was white. He could be a she, sure, fine. Those statements do nothing to alter the possibilities of who could be making them, it could be a self hating black man. To think those statements would be made just to cast doubt on the race of the poster is willful ignorance.