It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: bobs_uruncle
I bet your wife was never invited to their weddings. Clinton was invited by Trump to his wedding. Yeah, they're totally just causal acquaintances. So casual that one was invited to another's wedding.
*rolls eyes*
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Profusion
Is this the first time that there is no "lesser" evil in a US presidential election? Once you get to a certain level of evil, it's kind of hard to get any lower. That's the sort of feeling I get about Clinton versus Trump.
No, it's not the first time. The two parties are two hands controlled by the same brain -- and it's been that way for many decades.
The evil is equal on both *sides,* this election, per the usual. It's up to you to believe it or live in a machinated partisan state of denial.
In a speech at the National Defense University in Washington, Obama said his Jan. 21, 2009, executive order to close the prison was never implemented because House Republicans placed funding and legislative restrictions on moving suspected terrorists from the facility and blocked efforts to shut it down. But he didn’t mention his own administration’s missteps in not shutting down the prison in one year’s time, as he had promised.
“As president, I have tried to close Gitmo,” Obama said. “I transferred 67 detainees to other countries before Congress imposed restrictions to effectively prevent us from either transferring detainees to other countries, or imprisoning them in the United States. These restrictions make no sense.”
How Obama Bungled the Guantánamo Closing
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: bobs_uruncle
I bet your wife was never invited to their weddings. Clinton was invited by Trump to his wedding. Yeah, they're totally just causal acquaintances. So casual that one was invited to another's wedding.
*rolls eyes*
originally posted by: Profusion
I have studied the issue of the differences between the parties. There are significant differences.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: bobs_uruncle
All I see in your post is denial. Keep denying Trump is establishment if you want, but once he gets into office and things stay the same then don't say I didn't tell you so. You can quote this and put it in your signature if you want, I don't care, just don't say we didn't warn you.
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and hangs out with a bunch of other ducks, its probably a damn duck but people like you try to say he's a goose.
He's had establishment around him for years, he's one of them, a wolf in sheeps clothing. Mark my words, you'll regret supporting him. Either that or you'll make excuses for him.