Pakistani husbands can ‘lightly beat’ their wives, Islamic council says

When Pakistan’s most populated province approved a law this year that gives women protection – and a potential escape – from abusive husbands, the country’s powerful Council of Islamic Ideology strongly opposed the move. The council, also known as the CII and made up of Islamic clerics and scholars who advise Pakistani legislators, said it was “un-Islamic” for women to leave an abusive relationship and seek refuge in a shelter.

So,a husband can beat his wife if she defies his commands and refuses to dress up as per his desires, turns down demand of intercourse without any "religious" excuse, or does not take bath after intercourse or menstrual periods. So for a woman to have a different idea that that of her husband, free thinking, she will be bashed by a barbaric and cruel savage. This religion has moved so far back into the time-machine of vile and inhuman practices for total control of women. www.washingtonpost.com... &wpinl_wv

a reply to: tommo39

That's gods way bro
Gods way

Grade A racism and Islamophobia.

God, the conservative community just wont give up!

Well it's only Light beatings,you bigoted Islamophobe

a reply to: Raxoxane

What do people in South Africa believe about this topic I'd be interested in hearing your perspective being from a massively different country than the US.

a reply to: tommo39

They can haul their limp wristed azzes over here and they can get some of this:

Punk hitting Woman


Punks.

a reply to: onequestion

So discussing a law that was passed in another country is racist and adheres to "Islamaphobia" (which i believe is an extremely pejorative term that is used to express distaste for those who have reservations about Islam)?

How so?

a reply to: tommo39

And until they cease this archaic practice, those who partake in the state sanctioned harming of women will remain social pariahs and will remain incompatible with the ideals of freedom and liberty.

a reply to: SomeDumbBroad

Oh I dont mean it, I just wanted to get that out there before the social justice warriors.

a reply to: tommo39

That's part of the reason Muslims emigrate to the West, to escape religious rule.

a reply to: onequestion

Touche then.
Carry on! lol

a reply to: Kali74

I think the correct way to communicate that idea is to say, "Thats part of the reason why SOME Muslims move to the West, blah blah blah".

Just saying. Lets be honest with ourselves as a starting point.

a reply to: EmmanuelGoldstein

That's gods way

Sorry, i don't agree with you because there is NO god

a reply to: onequestion

Actually the better way to communicate what I meant would have been: One of the reasons Muslims emigrate to the West but if I edited now, someone would cry.

a reply to: tommo39

From Europe can you communicate more to us about your stance on this issue considering your closer to what the media describes as chaos?

I'm really trying to get perspective from other countries closer to the chaos.

a reply to: Kali74

That's part of the reason Muslims emigrate to the West, to escape religious rule.

Yes i agree with that, as long as they don't try and change the "status quo" and culture of the country. But unfortunately this is happening.

originally posted by: tommo39
a reply to: EmmanuelGoldstein

That's gods way

Sorry, i don't agree with you because there is NO god

I don't believe in god either.
But believing in god = beating your wife, that's all

Which is fine and all as long as its not god's wife

a reply to: Kali74

Thats to soft for me I require a different approach.

In my opinion human animals are predatory and need to be viewed as such for proper perspective.

Sun Tzhu and Machiavelli had it right.

originally posted by: tommo39
a reply to: Kali74

That's part of the reason Muslims emigrate to the West, to escape religious rule.

Yes i agree with that, as long as they don't try and change the "status quo" and culture of the country. But unfortunately this is happening.

Where is it happening?

a reply to: onequestion

What?