Underwater Pyramid City Discovered Near Cuba

a reply to: blkcwbyhat

Yeah. I know.

The "Bimini road" not miles long and there is really nothing very special about it.
img.gawkerassets.com...
bizlifes.net...
www.bahamasgeotourism.com...
imgc.allpostersimages.com... -bahamas.jpg

Nor these.
Yosemite
Joshua Tree

Love it Love awesome threads amazing stuff

originally posted by: Swills
Why it's this way I'll never know but it is what it is.

Thanks for that, I know I could have done it also, but was unsure as no one else had seemed to mention it.

And I agree. A simple bit of code would allow the entire url to be used, and parsed to select the vid id, if that was really a necessity for the forums. seems like so much is done, yet simple things are absurdly left broken..

originally posted by: Parafitt

originally posted by: Swills
Why it's this way I'll never know but it is what it is.

Thanks for that, I know I could have done it also, but was unsure as no one else had seemed to mention it.

And I agree. A simple bit of code would allow the entire url to be used, and parsed to select the vid id, if that was really a necessity for the forums. seems like so much is done, yet simple things are absurdly left broken..

The code in the OP's video has an extension, probably related to the video user's own channel.
The quickest way to get the URL useable for here is just to copy and paste the video headline, and then you will get a single standing Youtube video URL....(if the video is not private) AKA, HTTPblah blah=numberletter use nothing before the =sign

To add, in this case the OP used all the URL copied into the video box in reply, again, use nothing before the = sign and delete the HTTP prefix already in the video box, then paste what you have left.

a reply to: novrod

I checked google earth for the ocean floor in that region and the entire area is blurred out.

Could be from lack of data but I would not be surprised if Google had found underwater anomalies and blurs the images.

If you think about it, the Earth is 70% water. Imagine how many objects may have crashed into the ocean and now lay at the ocean floor...

originally posted by: EternalShadow
a reply to: novrod

From the article:

"Estimating that it would have taken 50,000 years for such structures to have sunken to the depth at which they were said to be found, Iturralde added "50,000 years ago there wasn't the architectural capacity in any of the cultures we know of to build complex buildings." A specialist in underwater archaeology at Florida State University added "It would be cool if they were right, but it would be real advanced for anything we would see in the New World for that time frame. The structures are out of time and out of place."


Not able to watch the video right now, but wow! What a diving expedition that would be!!

Some times things do not go according to schedule. Here is one example of nature failing to follow the timeline.

whc.unesco.org...

Wow, amazing, they found a lost city in exactly the same place that the Russians dumped all their prefab missile silos over the side during the Cuban missile crisis, what are the odds of that

a reply to: Marduk

Star for making me laugh.

It wouldn't surprise me one way or the other except that with the amount of pyramids and cities in that area why it should be strange seems more odd, especially if as someone else pointed out the city could be aligned with the young Canadian's theory.

But what does intrigue me is that all we have left of the brilliant stone movers and shakers etc is their final building. We don'e see any sign (that I can remember ever seeing) of earlier efforts of construction - where is the learning curve to develop the skills for buildings these ancient structures? The only one I can call to mind is the bent pyramid in Egypt. But there is nothing in the Americas except cave dwellings or in the rest of the world.

What is interesting is that this knowledge was alive with the people who built Nan Madol comparatively recently - at least within recorded history.

weburbanist.com...

Built it as late as the 8th/9th CE, so people with very advanced engineering skills were around at that late time. They were the Saudeleur whom disappeared off the face of the earth according to the above article. Now the engineering for that place was way beyond the capacity we thought people had in those days.

The point I am questioning is where did they originally learn these skills that have been carried more or less around the world and also, the ability to handle the ergonomics to create them?

a reply to: Shiloh7

It wouldn't surprise me one way or the other except that with the amount of pyramids and cities in that area

A lot of pyramids and cities on Cuba, are there?

originally posted by: Shiloh7
The point I am questioning is where did they originally learn these skills that have been carried more or less around the world and also, the ability to handle the ergonomics to create them?

You are asking how humans learned to use stone

Previously to the Bronze age,
Neolithic starts 5000BCE
Mesolithic starts 10,000BCE
Palaeolithic starts 2,6 million years ago

The clue would be in the word Lithic

Right here is an interesting earlier thread to look at from 2008, there are plenty more but this is a good one.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Now some here are suggesting they were Concrete soviet missile silo's, no way and by the way Paulina Zelitsky would have recognized them if that was the case, she used to work for the Soviets and haled design soviet underwater submarine bases on CUBA before defecting to Canada.
atlantipedia.ie...

a reply to: novrod

thank you for bringing this to our awareness on ats, it is a great find.

I think there is something there and also there are probably a lot of others underwater structures and what is under the ice in Antarctica is also something left to be discovered.

just a few more cases from underwater:

- Dwaraka an Indian city from the time of Krishna.


- Or underwater Indian bridge, build by Rama:



and also more general information from all around the globe.
i really recommend this documentary and whole series The survivors for alternative opinion of history.


there are a lot of interesting discoveries in the past and also still being discovered and in my opinion it is only a matter of time until this come to public awareness if powers that be would or will allow it...some say they don't want that to happen, - but why, who or what about that are questions for another thread.

History is not what is seems in my opinion, after doing some study about it. of course many will disagree and say I am talking nonsense...and that may just be true as I don't obviously know the truth and nobody else know is also, it is all just interpretation...

and I don't mind nad as far as I am concerned there is plenty of evidence for ancient global advanced civilization...and maybe even few of them.

originally posted by: UniFinity
and I don't mind nad as far as I am concerned there is plenty of evidence for ancient global advanced civilization...and maybe even few of them.

Well, none of this is evidence of that
You have there a natural formation, Adam's bridge, the Archaeological Survey of India which found no evidence for it being man-made

Your collection of finds from Dwaraka, in the bay of Cambray, were dredged from the ocean floor. There is no city there and the claim that there was a city there was made by the minister in charge of Marine tourism. He was soon proved to be a liar. You can easily prove me wrong here, show me just one picture of a man made structure from the site, not the side scan sonar, which was deliberately misread

So you think a natural structure and a liar are evidence for a global civilisation, think about it, the evidence would be overwhelming if it were true, so why is it that you can only produce evidence that is fraudulent ?

a reply to: Marduk

hey, long time no see!
I am happy to read a nice reply from you to me.
You have my gratitude for not being rude as last time, but I admit, I was asking for it...a bit.

: )

some say it is natural others say otherwise.
well ... after looking at a lot of the pictures of some of their underwater sites, it seems not natural to me.

There are not so many straight lines in nature and other almost perfect angles...in my opinion!

as far as bridge goes, there is nice evidence that such layers do not appear naturally. And there is evidence of some structure far long ago...
At least that is the information from video clip based on their research.
I believe their research is valid and they are honest about it and are just reporting it as it is.


fraudulent ... heh that is a nice sounding word.
so is maybe everything to be out of the box fraudulent? : )

look, I am not here to change your opinion on these matters, I understand you have your career probably in related area, and I do not want to devalue your efforts or knowledge in any way when I am writing to you.

But as far as I am concerned there is a lot of merit to some conspiracies about why there is maybe going on some suppression of knowledge about certain things.
what if some conspiracies are closer to the truth than what is our current understanding of global powers at the top.

I am pointing to mister Icke and Delonge who had AMA threads recently...they say some interesting things about this.

and in my opinion, if parts of their story is close to what is really going on in reality, than there is no question about resources and ability to manipulate entire population on the wrong path of knowledge, not just in history but also in other areas we think we understand so well.

So it is maybe possible, we have all been fooled since ancient history.

if it were so, do you think "they" are not smart enough to pull it off, who ever "they" are...if they are?
Take into account that, if conspiracy stories are true, they are either aliens with advanced technology or metaphysical beings with "superpowers"

well in both cases they are beings who have higher understanding of our true reality than us by far.

why not?



(this is a rhetorical question, because it is off thread)

originally posted by: UniFinity
a reply to: Marduk


some say it is natural others say otherwise.
well ... after looking at a lot of the pictures of some of their underwater sites, it seems not natural to me.

There are not so many straight lines in nature and other almost perfect angles...in my opinion!

as far as bridge goes, there is nice evidence that such layers do not appear naturally. And there is evidence of somestructure far long ago...
least that is the information from video clip based on their research.
I believe their research is valid and they are honest about it and are just reporting it as it is.

The video claimed it that Graham Hancock, John Anthony West and Robert Shock claimed the Gizamids were older than Egyptology says they are. This is false, they actually claim that the plans were old but the building date to the fourth dynasty. Now bearing in mind that the video you are using as evidence starts off by making a false statement and the people claiming that the bridge is natural are all qualified experts and not pseudo historians like Hancock et al. You probably need to evaluate the evidence again. There are plenty of straight lines in nature, they occur most often in rocks. Here for example is a picture of the giants causeway in Ireland, which is a natural formation
Do you see the straight lines ?

originally posted by: UniFinity

look, I am not here to change your opinion on these matters, I understand you have your career probably in related area, and I do not want to devalue your efforts or knowledge in any way when I am writing to you.

conspiracy blah blah

You are talking about a conspiracy which if it is to work, must contain, every single historian and archaeologist, Egyptologist, geologist etc etc etc
These people are not capable of creating a global conspiracy going back hundreds of years. The idea is patently absurd. It would require just one qualified expert to break the conspiracy, so they would all have to be fundamentally dishonest.



btw, mentioning David Icke in this forum is not going to help your credibility. Most people understand he is a crank.

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: JackMaryAnn
a reply to: onequestion

Landbridge that could have collapsed in the past just to be linked yet again?

At more than 2,000 feet? Probably not. The end of the last glacial period raised sea levels about 300 feet.

Well they did find Ancient Camp Site ( Settlements ) remains in the English Channel


DNA recovered from underwater British site may rewrite history of farming in Europe

By Michael BalterFeb. 26, 2015 , 2:15 PM

Hunter-gatherers may have brought agricultural products to the British Isles by trading wheat and other grains with early farmers from the European mainland. That’s the intriguing conclusion of a new study of ancient DNA from a now submerged hunter-gatherer camp off the British coast. If true, the find suggests that wheat made its way to the far edge of Western Europe 2000 years before farming was thought to have taken hold in Britain. The work confronts archaeologists “with the challenge of fitting this into our worldview,” says Dorian Fuller, an archaeobotanist at University College London who was not involved in the work. For decades, archaeologists had thought that incoming farmers from the Middle East moved into Europe beginning about 10,500 years ago and replaced or transformed hunter-gatherer populations as they moved west, not reaching Britain until about 6000 years ago. But that worldview had already undergone some modifications. Recent discoveries, for example, have shown some incoming farmers coexisted with the hunter-gatherers already living in Europe rather than quickly replacing them

www.sciencemag.org...


Stone Age Settlement Found Under English Channel
By Heather Whipps | August 9, 2007 05:32am ET
www.livescience.com...

'Britain's Atlantis' found at bottom of North sea - a huge undersea world swallowed by the sea in 6500BC

Divers have found traces of ancient land swallowed by waves 8500 years ago
Doggerland once stretched from Scotland to Denmark
Rivers seen underwater by seismic scans
Britain was not an island - and area under North Sea was roamed by mammoths and other giant animals
Described as the 'real heartland' of Europe
Had population of tens of thousands - but devastated by sea level rises
www.dailymail.co.uk...

Doggerland
en.wikipedia.org...

So if this happened from the Old World Recent Discoveries

why not the New World too..

Recorded Written History only has been around for like 8,000+ years
yet MODERN Man ( as what we are NOW ) has been on this Planet for about 250,000+ years
or if you go for a recent discovery date 400,000 years!
so thats a large percentage of History Lost!

I wouldn't put it pass me if there would be some Structures
even though 2,000 feet ?




The area around CUBA could of been like like Doggerland in a sense

seeing that from Cuba to the American Mainland ( Florida ) is like 90+ Miles..

but if it Actually there and Artificial not a natural formation .

that would be something to figure out..

A big Out of Place ..

originally posted by: Wolfenz

Recorded Written History only has been around for like 8,000+ years

5000 years

yet MODERN Man ( as what we are NOW ) has been on this Planet for about 250,000+ years

200,000 years

The area around CUBA could of been like like Doggerland in a sense

To take the Caribbean back to dry land you would have to drain the Atlantic and the Pacific, so no, its nothing like doggerland

Besides, shoreline data proves that the area was submerged 6000 years ago by rising sea levels.

Really, start with the evidence, you have some regular shaped rocks that is all, no city, no lost civilisation, just some rocks which only pseudo historians find significant. How are some rocks a lost city, who is making this stuff up

a reply to: Marduk

nice example for the lines. It is a good argument!
But was aware of this location and a bit how they are made from vulcan eruption.

well it may be that is also the case with other locations.

But if this is not, than another good explanation should be made, not just that it is natural.
Things which are underwater are never in straight lines.
Water is chipping away the rock in rounder manner, that is simple logic.
Just go to the river and look at the stones.

So how exactly did rocks become as they are on many photos of other locations?
the same question goes for the OP in this example in Cuba.

also you seem not to grasp full implications about real nature of such conspiracy.
This is implying about steering knowledge of science from the days of alchemy...origins of science.
As you know alchemy was and is for many considered spiritual system towards enlightenment, yet to ignorant people it seemed like just science.

Philosopher's stone is a metaphor as is conversion from led to gold...for some this is wisdom, for some it is nonsense.

...and they used that against us and here we are...

we were fooled right from the start in this case.

How can anyone after that even begin to understand real nature of reality if whole science is based on false principles right from the start.

You think is crazy?
there were many such scientists, some famous some not. And they DID just what you are talking about, in my opinion!
Tesla, Wilhelm Reich,Walter Russell, Edward Leedskalnin, etc...
or what about Newton and his main area. Which is occultism and alchemy?

... in some cases their research hushed up under the rug or threatened as crazy now..how convenient, maybe?

originally posted by: blkcwbyhat
a reply to: Phage

wasn't there something yrs ago,the bermuda highway or such? Huge sq blocks laid out for miles?

Edgar Cayce's group, the A.R.E. sent some people out to scan for Atlantis in the late sixties because that's when Cayce dreamed it would begin to rise up out of the ocean.

The only thing they could find was a natural beachrock shelf off Bimini, so they went with that.

The claim is repeated ad nauseam for decades, but now is only being touted by a couple of A.R.E. employees - "Dr." Gregg Little (family therapist) and Bill Donato (Masters in Archaeology - thesis written on "Atlantis in the Caribbean.")
Except for the occasional fringer popping up on "Ancient Aliens."

People making the claim know they are lying. People believing the claim haven't stopped to think about this:
If Bimini was such a bustling port for Atlantis, why no archaeological finds on the island itself?

Harte