It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes
I think I'd trust the 60,000 pediatricians who agree with the current standard treatment of transgender youth before I'd trust the 60 or so who don't agree.
originally posted by: TheLaughingGod
a reply to: Annee
I'm not an American so I don't care about your faulty objection as I was talking about Western civilisation in general. Don't make assumptions.
originally posted by: Atsbhct
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
" t’s also because the ACP is not a legitimate medical organization; its name is designed to be mistaken for the American Academy of Pediatrics, which is a national organization with some 60,000 members. The ACP, by contrast, is estimated to have no more than 200 members, and it has been designated aLink. hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center for its anti-LGBT positions."
originally posted by: TheLaughingGod
But really, these designations they're all arbitrary in a certain sense. Homosexuality used to be considered an illness, what changed? Certainly nothing biological, politics got involved. At some point people decide these things.
The danger as far as I'm concerned is that, when dealing with progressives you're always dealing with a slippery slope. Don't tell me we won't have furries clamouring for the normalisation of bestiality next. Anything goes.. after all, even morals are relativistic to these people.
originally posted by: TheLaughingGod
There's degrees of democracy you know, and most democracies - that go by the name of democracy - elect representatives. This is the norm as far as I know. I don't know why Americans get their jollies off by constantly pointing out that they are in fact a republic as if it were singularly unique, nevertheless the masses do have a right to vote, which is in fact a feature of democracy. These two forms of government are not mutually exclusive.
Maybe you can shed some light on this peculiarity?
Minority Rights I: Individual Rights vs. Majority Tyranny
Democracy therefore requires minority rights equally as it does majority rule. Indeed, as democracy is conceived today, the minority's rights must be protected no matter how singular or alienated that minority is from the majority society; otherwise, the majority's rights lose their meaning. In the United States, basic individual liberties are protected through the Bill of Rights, which were drafted by James Madison and adopted in the form of the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. These enumerate the rights that may not be violated by the government, safeguarding—in theory, at least—the rights of any minority against majority tyranny. Today, these rights are considered the essential element of any liberal democracy. democracyweb.org...
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain
Yeah it's our fault we have standards for what constitutes data and facts. How horrible that we don't just eat up anything that gives us the warm fuzzy feeling of confirmation bias.
originally posted by: TheLaughingGod
a reply to: Annee
I don't think there's any delusion involved in being a homosexual though, that's the difference in your example.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: TheLaughingGod
a reply to: Annee
I'm not an American so I don't care about your faulty objection as I was talking about Western civilisation in general. Don't make assumptions.
The title is: AMERICAN College of Pediatricians,
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: Annee
Bill of Rights protects the individual. The individual is equal to the majority In rights.
1) So long as those 'rights' don't tread on others
2) A lot of what people think are 'rights' actually are nothing of the sort
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
Gender dysphoria is clearly a mental illness and is in fact defined as such by the American Psychiatric Association in the DSM-5 if certain criteria are met. I am not sure why we are supposed to cater to these people.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain
Yeah it's our fault we have standards for what constitutes data and facts. How horrible that we don't just eat up anything that gives us the warm fuzzy feeling of confirmation bias.
Leftists have standards? I thought it was all about feelings.
The data and facts say XY = male, XX = female.
originally posted by: TheLaughingGod
a reply to: Annee
Schizophrenic and bipolar people on the right medications function normally also. What's your point?
originally posted by: Annee
I keep forgetting, You are the victim.
1. Are you denied access to bathrooms of the gender you identify with?
2. Can you be fired from your job for just existing?
3. Can you be denied service from a business because they don't agree with you?
Oh wait, you're a victim just because you don't like something.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: Annee
I keep forgetting, You are the victim.
No, I am a person. I don't play the victim card.
1. Are you denied access to bathrooms of the gender you identify with?
2. Can you be fired from your job for just existing?
3. Can you be denied service from a business because they don't agree with you?
1. I don't identify with a gender. I am a male. XY. No personal identity feelings needed. It's called biology.
2. No, and neither can any other American citizen, despite what you think.
3. Yes, actually. And I wouldn't sue them for it. I would take my money elsewhere, as any other common sense person would.
Oh wait, you're a victim just because you don't like something.
No, that would just be you projecting the chip on your shoulder.
originally posted by: Misterlondon
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
Gender dysphoria is clearly a mental illness and is in fact defined as such by the American Psychiatric Association in the DSM-5 if certain criteria are met. I am not sure why we are supposed to cater to these people.
Do we not cater for others with "mental illnesses"