It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But to suggest that Bill Clinton was given a pass for his womanizing is ridiculous! The whole country was glued to their TVs and the man was impeached.
He's not running for president.
She was the VICTIM of a womanizer
trying to make her somehow responsible is just going to turn more and more women against Trump
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: butcherguy
Not by Hillary.
Not sure what you mean... Are you saying that Hillary didn't impeach him?
This NYT piece is a hit piece for sure. And yes, FOX (and other conservative outlets) does hit pieces on Hilllary. But to suggest that Bill Clinton was given a pass for his womanizing is ridiculous! The whole country was glued to their TVs and the man was impeached.
Not to mention that it has NOTHING to do with Hillary. If SHE was the one using men, then there might be something to say about it, but using Bill's exploits to tarnish Hillary is just ... stupid. He's not running for president. She was the VICTIM of a womanizer and trying to make her somehow responsible is just going to turn more and more women against Trump, since his message is that Hillary is somehow to blame for her husband's affairs.
originally posted by: eluryh22
I wouldn't say that Billy was given a pass overall but he was given a pass by some.
However, I don't think that people are making her responsible for Bill's actions. Rather, the Trumpeters are stating (and I do have to admit I believe this to be true) that it's not that she stood by Bill during/after his shenanigans, it's that she took an active part in attacking and attempting to utterly destroy the women with whom Bill played around with.
originally posted by: butcherguy
What I mean is that Hillary 'stood by her man'.
She actively went about destroying the names of the women that were brave enough to tell their stories about Bill.
And so is Trump.
I have never seen ANY indication that Hillary did ANYTHING to these women.
Reuters reports that Roger Stone, a Republican strategist and Donald Trump supporter, is putting together a group of women to campaign against Hillary Clinton, should the former Secretary of State win the Democrat nomination. The political action committee, originally created last year with the name Women Against Hillary, is now called the Rape Accountability Project for Education PAC, or RAPE PAC.
originally posted by: eluryh22
HERE is just a quick summary.
And she allowed her husband to abuse women, to harass women, possibly other things that he did wrong to women. And she allowed it to happen.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: butcherguy
What I mean is that Hillary 'stood by her man'.
So, you're saying she should have divorced him? How is THEIR marriage ANYONE'S business?
She actively went about destroying the names of the women that were brave enough to tell their stories about Bill.
Link? To a news story, please. I was there. I watched the whole thing. I never heard of Hillary doing ANYTHING. I may have missed it, but I can't find anything on it.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: UnBreakable
She's smart. He once sued the Chicago Times for half a billion dollars because their Pulitzer prize winning architecture critic questioned the plausibility of a building that Trump ended up not building anyway.