New York Times: How Donald Trump Behaved With Women in Private

The New York Times interviewed dozens of women who had worked with or for Mr. Trump over the past four decades, in the worlds of real estate, modeling and pageants; women who had dated him or interacted with him socially; and women and men who had closely observed his conduct since his adolescence. In all, more than 50 interviews were conducted over the course of six weeks.

Their accounts — many relayed here in their own words — reveal unwelcome romantic advances, unending commentary on the female form, a shrewd reliance on ambitious women, and unsettling workplace conduct, according to the interviews, as well as court records and written recollections. The interactions occurred in his offices at Trump Tower, at his homes, at construction sites and backstage at beauty pageants. They appeared to be fleeting, unimportant moments to him, but they left lasting impressions on the women who experienced them.
Crossing the Line: How Donald Trump Behaved With Women in Private

I wonder what the "There is no such thing as right and wrong" crowd will say about this. I believe no one truly believes that. They just say it like a motto that actually is completely empty.

It looks like Trump is a prototypical asshole. I used to think Trump was a real-life Gordon Gekko but Gekko was better, a lot better.

Back To The Future Writer Says Biff Was Based On Donald Trump


www.youtube.com...

Well, Trump is still head and shoulders above Hillary Clinton.

I read the article. My favorite part is where the Times cited his high school yearbook where it said he was a 'lady's man'.

What the hell else did all of us guys want to be referenced to in our yearbooks? Most likely to be a virgin until 26?

a reply to: Profusion
Can you imagine the women if The NY Times had been this interested in Bill Clinton?

I don't believe one thing the New York Times comes up with about Trump.
I wonder how many of these women are democrats? I wonder how many interviews were twisted and spun for the Times' purposes.

a reply to: Profusion

Lol, probably just the same behaviours as the hundred other men who who hit on them that week....

When it was good ole Billy boy, they all painted him as a true good old boy, for doing these same type of things.

But now that it's Trump, the same Bill Clinton fans are all upset and mad..

Gosh they just cannot leave Trump alone can they? With all the Clintons' doings and screwings im sure they could compile some much more hair raising interviews.Books full,im sure.But that may be a dangerous road to follow.So rather pick on the one less likely to ensure you have an unfortunate accident.

Why do I get the feeling that the whole Cosby news eruption was the attempt at a dry run off this event happening now? But at the time it happened was the one time Carson was ahead in the polls. Since some of the MSM have nothing they can think of they are now trying Throw spaghetti at the wall and to see what sticks. They did not listen back then and they are not listening now "the only way to beat the Don is to not talk about the Don" But it is now too late to Ron Paul him.

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
When it was good ole Billy boy, they all painted him as a true good old boy, for doing these same type of things.

Are you serious??? Clinton was impeached! You're rewriting history!

a reply to: Profusion

The NY Times has a hard on with bringing down Trump, just as the same can be said about Fox News and Hillary. The truth lies somewhere in between. That being said this hit piece by the Times will result in about 30,000 more votes for Trump.

But in public, on talk shows, late night television, they were dancing it up for Bill Clinton, and they painted his womanizing as perfectly good and very cool. The media attempted to rewrite HIS history

He finally got some punishment sure, but his old persona is still painted as "not that bad". (Because he supported those leftist agendas they all love so much) It's the same free pass we see supporters of liars like Obama continuing to give out like candy.

I had to laugh at the biff reference.. Can imagine him getting hilary in a headlock and rubbing her head with his knuckles.. "hello, hello, hilary, anybody home..."

a reply to: Benevolent Heretic

It's like both can't be womanizers or something...

Heard one of the women on Fox news this morning. She's saying she was misquoted and her words totally twisted from what she actually said. Wonder if any of the other women will now do the same?

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
When it was good ole Billy boy, they all painted him as a true good old boy, for doing these same type of things.

Are you serious??? Clinton was impeached! You're rewriting history!

Not by Hillary.

originally posted by: Misterlondon
I had to laugh at the biff reference.. Can imagine him getting hilary in a headlock and rubbing her head with his knuckles.. "hello, hello, hilary, anybody home..."

What do you mean by "reference"? Please see the article below. Biff Tannen in Back to the Future 2 was based on Donald Trump. It's not like people are comparing them because they happen to be similar. No, they're similar because "Biff Is Donald Trump" according to the writer of the films. Trump is not being compared to Tannen in Back to the Future 2 because it randomly fits. It's not random, Trump was the model.

In the movie, Biff Tannen – Hill Valley's number-one citizen, America's greatest living folk hero and Marty McFly's arch nemesis – resides in a palatial penthouse atop a casino, which bears a striking resemblance to the Trump Plaza Hotel, which opened its doors five years before the film premiered.

"Yeah,” Gale said. "That's what we were thinking about."
'Back to the Future' Writer: Biff Is Donald Trump

Cruz saw it clearly, apparently.

Ted Cruz On Trump: We're Looking At The Biff Tannen Presidency Indiana Primary Press Conference


www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: BlueAjah
I don't believe one thing the New York Times comes up with about Trump.
I wonder how many of these women are democrats? I wonder how many interviews were twisted and spun for the Times' purposes.

I have a ton of respect for you so please don't take the following comment personally.

Reading your comment above is a little maddening. When I first started posting here I didn't think conspiracy theorists would care about sources very much. When I'm doing serious research, I don't care about sources at all. I've found that's the only way to get to the real truth.

However, I was blasted in multiple threads for not providing MSM sources even concerning facts that were easily verifiable. Because of that, now I only start threads with information from MSM, government, or educational sources (in almost all the forums).

To read the above quote from you makes me feel frustrated. You're rejecting this because it's from an MSM source. I feel like it's too hard to win sometimes.

Everyone knows a Biff. So Trump is king of the Biff wads. How else you get rich, by being nice?

Like this sexual reference better… (Language warning) This is during his 2011 bid for office. Back when he didn't care as much about his spit and polished image.

YouTube...

A whole room full of Biffs applauding.

a reply to: Profusion

For what it's worth.... one of the women in the article does NOT agree with how the Times portrayed her statements.

Link

originally posted by: butcherguy
Not by Hillary.

Not sure what you mean... Are you saying that Hillary didn't impeach him?

This NYT piece is a hit piece for sure. And yes, FOX (and other conservative outlets) does hit pieces on Hilllary. But to suggest that Bill Clinton was given a pass for his womanizing is ridiculous! The whole country was glued to their TVs and the man was impeached.

Not to mention that it has NOTHING to do with Hillary. If SHE was the one using men, then there might be something to say about it, but using Bill's exploits to tarnish Hillary is just ... stupid. He's not running for president. She was the VICTIM of a womanizer and trying to make her somehow responsible is just going to turn more and more women against Trump, since his message is that Hillary is somehow to blame for her husband's affairs.

a reply to: Profusion

Ha Ha what a stupid propaganda mistake. How many people are going to think immediately of Bill Clinton's womanising and scr-w-ng in the White House when on government business? At least Trump did it on his own time!

Were Trump in Office I suspect he would be too old and too busy to waste government time like Bill clearly did.

A very stupid propaganda intake that will backfire against the Clintons - I am surprised Hilary didn't see this one coming.