It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: schuyler
originally posted by: mobiusmale
I think the people of America, and the media, need to put this has-been on permanent ignore.
He's already lost once, in an election he should have easily won. When the GOP went back to "study" the election to see what went wrong, one of the conclusions of the study was that the GOP should let the people decide what candidate they wanted. Obviously, the GOP has not assimilated or learned anything from their own study.
That's because what their electorate wants is quite frankly, insane. That's why the GOP is picking their own, their party has a whole bunch of people who show up to vote that effectively want anarchy. It's just not feasible.
McConnell has reportedly advised Republicans that they can run ads against Trump to create separation from the polarizing GOP frontrunner if they believe it can help their reelection efforts.
The majority leader is also preparing to pitch the Senate as a necessary check to an inevitable Hillary Clinton presidency if Trump is the GOP’s nominee, according to the Times.
originally posted by: incoserv
I am not a Trump supporter. I do not like Trump.
If the GOP does this, I will campaign for Donald Trump.
originally posted by: seeker1963
People are threatening to leave the country if he is elected! Is that a bad thing against him or spoiled rotten pansies that are too damned stupid to realize we still have a house and senate put in place to put a balance for or against his wishes? Not to mention a Supreme Court who would have the final say?
This is actually my biggest concern with Trump. He has bought several members of Congress in the past, and nothing would stop him from doing so as President. I am extremely apprehensive to hand executive power over to someone who has the personal resources to also control congress. It would be like making David Kock or George Sooros President. It's a very bad idea.
originally posted by: seeker1963
So you admitted to seeing the problem with our so called "Representative Government" but yet you blame those smart enough to game the system versus demanding those the people elect to honor their oath?
originally posted by: mobiusmale
so that he has a chance to slither in there and steal the nomination on the convention floor!
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: seeker1963
So you admitted to seeing the problem with our so called "Representative Government" but yet you blame those smart enough to game the system versus demanding those the people elect to honor their oath?
Trying to disable government isn't a solution. Government provides a very useful service, and you can look all over the world there are many examples of competent functioning governments. If you vote for people who run on a platform of making government worse, that is precisely what you're going to get and the whole thing becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. I would rather vote for people who legitimately want to make government better like Sanders.
originally posted by: seeker1963
Don't put words in my mouth! I never said disable government. Emotional BS doesn't fly with me.
Maybe that's our problem, too many people depend on it? Don't worry, that isn't your fault and it sure as hell wasn't by accident!
Are Republicans and Romney really stupid enough to think we would vote for him...especially after they co-opted the democratic process? They are going to be in for a surprise if they think they can win with that kind of crap.