It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: spirit_horse
originally posted by: unicornholiday
a reply to: spirit_horse
What do you call a mother and daughter shot at 107 times (miraculously living) and 8 cops allowed to walk because they were deemed too incompetent and scared to perform their jobs yet not fired?
What do you call an officer suing for backpay and disability because he claims his abuse of civilians left him traumatized?
Yeah, they're all great people. Upstanding members.
You need to get a grip on reality. There are abuses regardless of what group of people you pull out of the hat. However, that by far has nothing to do with the majority as Shamrock6 tried to point out to you. Most of our LEO's regardless of agency are good people that don't abuse their power or make outrageous claims. I started a thread about the mother and daughter (figure you know that since you used it as an example) and it was the DA that made that decision, not the investigators. Lawyers are some slimy creatures indeed imo.
I never said they are all great outstanding people either. I used to work deep cover on a special task force targeting crime in agencies on the federal level. It happens and you can't run a large organization of any kind without pulling in bad apples. However, you can't judge the majority or the entire group about the few. You sound like one that would genocide all Muslims because a number of nuts manage to cause all sorts of murder and mayhem. I suppose you would argue we should get rid of all the rest of the Muslims or just kill a bunch of innocent ones to make up the numbers for the minority?
You can't post complete bunk on ATS and not expect to be called out about it. Don't take it too personally as it is your statements that are of issue, not you personally.
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
while you have just advocated or rationalized killing an unrelated person for the putative crimes of another.
originally posted by: unicornholiday
a reply to: spirit_horse
I understand it's not the popular opinion.
If you want to see some truly dumb posts,
go read what some of these boot lickers
say in the defense of murdering gestapo
soldiers when they're caught in the act.
"The officer that morning had learned his mother had cancer
so I understand why he shot the guy for running."
GTFO
originally posted by: unicornholiday
I don't take it personally.
Just as I don't have anything personal against you.
The majority in my belief are criminals with badges and act with impunity.
We see daily how they are handed out paid vacations.
(unrelated I hope you put many of them in prison and jail for very long periods of time.)
That being said now - Shamrock is constantly posting in the defense of these criminals with badges...
I've seen his posts before and his boot licking mentality disgusts me.
Think he's a swell guy though.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: unicornholiday
You should really check my post history. I have zero problem saying when I believe an officer has crossed the line and committed an indefensible act. Don't mistake my knowledge of the law and use of force for boot licking, though I know that's easiest for the dim ones. If you're going to reference my post history, you should probably be able to reference the entirety of it, and not just cherry pick what you think supports your claim.
Blanket statements are mentally lazy.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
Apparently this was the ending to a lengthy foreclosure process, that Wirth had stated was an illegal foreclosure. Near as I can tell, the process started in 2013 or 2014.
Wirth is identified as having run for state senate as a Green Party candidate, and was a member of occupy Denver. He also fancied himself a "high value target" for law enforcement.
www.thedenverchannel.com...