It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Krazysh0t
What is "wrong" with having 100's?
Like there is something inherently "wrong"with a larger bill?
Or do you perhaps mean "as opposed to"?
Really two entirely different questions.
Hopefully you do not mean "wrong" as in "morally wrong"?
I don't really care one way or the other. That was my point. If we have them, cool. If not. Oh well.
originally posted by: marg6043
Elimination of paper currency will give the governments and bankers total power over the working classes.
They will take upon themselves to make sure you pay your dues first and feed yourself second.
That is the wet dream of every government and bankers in the word.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
I don't really care one way or the other. That was my point. If we have them, cool. If not. Oh well.
originally posted by: burntheships
Yes, a cashless society is part of the agenda, though I think a socialist
agenda will precede that, hard to take from someone what one cant find.
originally posted by: spinalremain
I for one do not buy into the sky is falling and Indo not think anything will come of this, but you have to realize that if something of this nature were to happen, it indeed has a sinister agenda. It's all about control.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Really? Because a socialist agenda would be great.
The masses would finally be treated with respect and money wouldn't constantly be funneled to the select few.
Oh well, have fun waking up in cold sweats over other people being happy they can afford to live finally.