It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“: the political, economic, and social principles and policies advocated by Marx; especially : a theory and practice of socialism including the labor theory of value, dialectical materialism, the class struggle, and dictatorship of the proletariat until the establishment of a classless society”
“ Critical theory is a school of thought that stresses the reflective assessments and critique of society and culture by applying knowledge from the social sciences and the humanities.”
originally posted by: NihilistSanta
I bring this thread and these videos to ATS so that we can recognize the problem and discuss it. There is an opposition movement out there that is becoming ethnocentric. We need to help people understand this without revisionism or appealing to instincts of xenophobia. The challenge is that I want to preserve western culture. Western culture while it has had its misteps has created some of the greatest contributions to all members of humanity. From the sciences, to economic freedom, to philosophical thought that protects the individual and private property, to Christian charity, western culture has helped to raise up some of the most backwards parts of the world. Many of you are indoctrinated already. You will focus on issues of race, or religion, or sex etc instead of asking why this is being done. You will reinforce your own guilt and biases, project your own racism and hatred, some of you will focus on “which group” is doing this. This is another vector for racist movements and also a distraction. Some of you will be offended because you belong to one of the offending groups. Everyone needs to realize that you are not as original as you think. We are all subject to becoming useful idiots unless we educate ourselves.
hey are reacting to the smothering of their culture and identities through cultural Marxism and critical theory. It ties into stuff like Gamergate, people protesting Star Wars, people upset about Bruce Jenner.
originally posted by: NihilistSanta
a reply to: DJW001
You are stating what the videos and myself have already stated. This was what the reference to "useful idiots" was referring to. I also made it a point to show that no one is immune from being used in such a way.
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: NihilistSanta
a reply to: DJW001
You are stating what the videos and myself have already stated. This was what the reference to "useful idiots" was referring to. I also made it a point to show that no one is immune from being used in such a way.
Your disclaimers are surrounded by dense rhetoric. The phrase "cultural Marxism" is unfortunate, as it implies that the proposed solution to the perceived imbalance of societal power is economic. When homosexuals want to have the same rights as heterosexuals, the solution is not to give control of the means of production to the workers.
Your analysis is biased in other ways. First, you assume that social criticism is exclusively leveled at "western" institutions. In fact, it is leveled at whatever society the critics inhabit. Social activists oppose monarchy, Islam, Stalinism, and so forth in countries where these "isms" apply. Obviously, social criticism is more dangerous in these "non-western" societies.
Secondly, you overemphasize the contribution of central European socialist academics. There was not much interest in their brand of Marxist analysis outside of academia in the United States. There was a long tradition of grassroots labor organizing in America that sought to make capitalism more just, not overthrow it.
The greatest impetus to what you (lamentably) call "scientific Marxism" came with the influx of "structuralist" thought from France in the 1960s. Levi-Strauss, Fanon, and especially Foucault, developed their deconstructionist theories as an alternative to Marxist analysis, which had been losing its dominant place in French academic thought. It is they who expanded social criticism from the economic to the personal, with an emphasis of how institutions use coercion to maintain power over groups, and individuals use power to control others. Foucault was positively Sadean in his view of power. Throw in Jacques Derrida's ability to prove that black is white and up is down, and you had the perfect formula for transforming society into a free for all of conflicting "victims."
Your greatest error is in assuming this is addressing some sort of coherent goal. Perhaps its earliest theoreticians thought that getting different groups within an industrialized society to feel oppressed might make them more inclined to revolt against capitalism, but by the time it trickled down to "community organizers" by way of the French, it tended to re-conform itself to the traditional American labor desire of getting a bigger slice of the pie, not tossing the pie out altogether.
Published on Jul 25, 2015
This video is NOT fiction but based on Fact: The agenda of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and the CPUSA Progressives attempt to sabotage the constituted restrictions withholding absolute power from our central government. A communist form of government is an autocratic, authoritarian construct so a cartel of elites have total control to "dictate" economic, ethic, and sociological elements of society. The Pros is to subvert funds and power to a privileged few who hold the political power. Not a new ideology, an ideology over 80 years forced imprisonment, tortured, genocide and mass executions: millions have perished under the guise of "share the wealth" or the modern indoctrination "Climate Changed" as defined by the communist (Karl Marx) Van Jones who Barack Obama hired specifically to head "green jobs" vetted by Valerie Jarrett who has a history of communist ties.
THE U.S. WILL BECOME A COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT WITHIN 10 YEARS
originally posted by: woodwardjnr
Has it been successful in promoting Marxism or is the world still mainly dominated by global capitalism with much of the "culture" being dominated by American hagemonic values? It's always been a term used by Jon Birchers as a blanket term for anything they don't like or agree with.