It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS or “the
Department”) is issuing this final rule to modify the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy Rule to expressly permit certain HIPAA
covered entities to disclose to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System
(NICS) the identities of individuals who are subject to a Federal “mental health
prohibitor” that disqualifies them from shipping, transporting, possessing, or receiving a
firearm.
federalregister.gov/2015-33181
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: seeker1963
Double postedit on 8-1-2016 by dazbog because: double post
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: seeker1963
Every new law a politician wants to pass? Make them take 20 off the books!
Force them to study the unconstitutional laws they represent by making them thin em out before passing anymore! It isn't a damn accident that the United States of America has more people in prison than Russia and China combined......
I agree.
It seems to me, that many of Washington's politicians do not understand the Constitutions.
Perhaps a law should be passed to make all politicians to take a course about the Constitution. It is clearly written in the second amendment that: Right Shell Not Be Infringed A pond.
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: seeker1963
Every new law a politician wants to pass? Make them take 20 off the books!
Force them to study the unconstitutional laws they represent by making them thin em out before passing anymore! It isn't a damn accident that the United States of America has more people in prison than Russia and China combined......
I agree.
It seems to me, that many of Washington's politicians do not understand the Constitutions.
Perhaps a law should be passed to make all politicians to take a course about the Constitution. It is clearly written in the second amendment that: Right Shell Not Be Infringed A pond.
originally posted by: dazbog
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: seeker1963
Every new law a politician wants to pass? Make them take 20 off the books!
Force them to study the unconstitutional laws they represent by making them thin em out before passing anymore! It isn't a damn accident that the United States of America has more people in prison than Russia and China combined......
I agree.
It seems to me, that many of Washington's politicians do not understand the Constitutions.
Perhaps a law should be passed to make all politicians to take a course about the Constitution. It is clearly written in the second amendment that: Right Shell Not Be Infringed A pond.
I'd suggest you are cutting our alleged representatives a tad to much slack. They know damn well what the Constitution
represents. Considering many are Lawyers they have read the Federalist Papers. They know precisely how we should be
armed in long guns and side arms. They simply ignore it ! Why ? Because they can. Ya just gotta love the evil little bastards.
THE FOREFATHERS OF AMERICA WANTED YOU TO BE ARMED. THEY ARMED THEIR OWN PEOPLE, OR PROTECTED THEM. IN TODAY'S WORLD IT'S OPPOSITE, THE GOVERNMENT AND PRESIDENT HAS BEEN HIJACKED, AND AMERICA IS NOT LEAD BY AMERICANS.
That's reasonable. Ignorance is not.
Those whiny ass pro gun control people, live out of fear of the unknown. They don't lead, they follow. That's the kind of people who are anti gun rights.
Personally, I don't see his executive action as a bad thing...at least as it currently stands. If it was executive action to grab all of our guns, outlaw any firearm that can hold more than three rounds of ammo, or something else completely absurd, then I'd be pretty jacked. He's not placing bans on anything that isn't already banned, and he's not asking us to give up our guns. As I understand, he's trying to make it harder for criminals and the mentally unstable to get their hands on firearms.
That is true, however Obama is chipping away as much as he can on the Second Amendment, and when he leaves office, Hillary will start chipping away more on the Second Amendment until it all gone.
originally posted by: Informer1958
I find it really interesting that Obama is targeting Veterans.
He wants guns out of their hands, yet most if not all Veterans can still drive their cars and vote, as if these men are unable to make important discussions in handling their own weapons.
What is the government so afraid of?
Politicians do not listen to what folks want, they follow the agenda of stripping the US of the constitution and installing a totalitarian ruling class in it's place - the politically correct snowflakes are their latest army and Obama is their commander-in-chief.
If voting actually changed anything, politicians would make voting illegal
He could then have federal authorities go in and take the guns.
Maybe that's what his police task force is really looking at?