It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why Wait an Hour to Blow the Buildings ?
page: 9share:
a reply to: hellobruce
I believe any honest Engineer will tell you that WTC 7 would have started it's collapse from the 12 floors that were on fire, and not on the bottom floors that had no fires.
After the collapse of WTC 7, there should have been remaining parts of the building still intact from the 12 floor.
Since it is said that fires brought down the WTC, then it would have defiantly fell in it's lease resistance, and physics tells us that.
So exactly what should a "natural collapse" look like, in a building that was damaged and had unchecked fires burning?
A building that was creaking and making noises, and that the fire department knew would collapse, as they were watching it move?
I believe any honest Engineer will tell you that WTC 7 would have started it's collapse from the 12 floors that were on fire, and not on the bottom floors that had no fires.
After the collapse of WTC 7, there should have been remaining parts of the building still intact from the 12 floor.
Since it is said that fires brought down the WTC, then it would have defiantly fell in it's lease resistance, and physics tells us that.
edit on 3-1-2016 by Informer1958 because: (no reason given)
After the collapse of WTC 7, there should have been remaining parts of the building still intact from the 12 floor.
Right just like the other buildings 5,6, 3 ect, instead we got this.. a nice neat pile..
mk567deec5.jpg[/pic]]
a reply to: Informer1958
All it takes was for fire to weaken the steel structure and gravity will do the rest. Case in point is where fire from an overturned fuel truck in Oakland, CA. had weakened the steel structure of an overpass, which caused the overpass to collapse.
Since it is said that fires brought down the WTC, then it would have defiantly fell in it's lease resistance, and physics tells us that.
All it takes was for fire to weaken the steel structure and gravity will do the rest. Case in point is where fire from an overturned fuel truck in Oakland, CA. had weakened the steel structure of an overpass, which caused the overpass to collapse.
originally posted by: Informer1958
Since it is said that fires brought down the WTC, then it would have defiantly fell in it's lease resistance, and physics tells us that.
That is how it fell. Or do you think it should have somehow toppled over?
a reply to: Informer1958
So have explosives which make no noise ....
Explosives which dont break windows
911research.wtc7.net...
scroll down .....
Notice most windows facing WTC 7 are INTACT, few broken, most still there ......
Can see where WTC 7 gouged out parts of exterior shell
Now why if building blows up next to it , why still have windows in Verizon ???
So have explosives which make no noise ....
Explosives which dont break windows
911research.wtc7.net...
scroll down .....
Notice most windows facing WTC 7 are INTACT, few broken, most still there ......
Can see where WTC 7 gouged out parts of exterior shell
Now why if building blows up next to it , why still have windows in Verizon ???
a reply to: wildb
WTC 7 did not collapse in its own footprint. Check it out.
Photo 1: WTC 7
Photo 2: WTC 7
WTC 7 did not collapse in its own footprint. Check it out.
Photo 1: WTC 7
Photo 2: WTC 7
a reply to: samkent
The reason they waited an hour was so they could lie and say the fires did it since they burned so long it melted the steal
They knew nobody was leaving except the sensible because they told them not to leave.
"People began to evacuate, but an announcement over the intercom said everything was all right, no need to evacuate.' 'At 10-story intervals, he had to walk through burning corridors. Bizarrely, no sprinklers or alarms had been activated."
rense.com...
The reason they waited an hour was so they could lie and say the fires did it since they burned so long it melted the steal
They knew nobody was leaving except the sensible because they told them not to leave.
"People began to evacuate, but an announcement over the intercom said everything was all right, no need to evacuate.' 'At 10-story intervals, he had to walk through burning corridors. Bizarrely, no sprinklers or alarms had been activated."
rense.com...
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: Informer1958
So have explosives which make no noise ....
Explosives which dont break windows
911research.wtc7.net...
scroll down .....
Notice most windows facing WTC 7 are INTACT, few broken, most still there ......
Can see where WTC 7 gouged out parts of exterior shell
Now why if building blows up next to it , why still have windows in Verizon ???
What are you saying here, the Verzon building suffered much damage from the fall of WTC 7
edit on 3-1-2016 by wildb because: (no reason given)]
[edit on 3-1-2016 by wildb because: (no reason
given)
edit on 3/1/16 by masqua because: Tried to fix BB code error
edit on 3/1/16 by masqua because: (no reason
given)
edit on 3-1-2016 by wildb because: (no reason given)
steel melts at 2500 f, jet fuels burns at maximum 1800 f and was burnt off within minutes so it impossible the 'jet' impact caused steel to melt in
the basement. And wtc7 was not hit by a plane and was pulled.
We know 2.3 trillion dollars of pentagon transaction accounts were destroyed.
What the public isn't told is the truth behind these public facts.
We know it wasn't bin laden or the muslims and the Gov't of 2000-2004 was responsible,
because that is the only believable, reasonable and plausible answer.
a reply to: firerescue
We know 2.3 trillion dollars of pentagon transaction accounts were destroyed.
What the public isn't told is the truth behind these public facts.
We know it wasn't bin laden or the muslims and the Gov't of 2000-2004 was responsible,
because that is the only believable, reasonable and plausible answer.
a reply to: firerescue
originally posted by: Drawsoho
so it impossible the 'jet' impact caused steel to melt in the basement.
Who said steel was melted in the basement?
We know 2.3 trillion dollars of pentagon transaction accounts were destroyed.
No, that did not happen. Please show your source for that claim.
Melted steel was found by firefighters in the basement of the WTC1
and WTC2.
Once the 'jet' hit the revonovated, hardened and almost empty
pentagon, the Naval auditors and records were 100% destroyed.
Not one flight data recorder was found but a muslim passport was.
How did that happen. Where was the wreckage in the Penssylvania
crash? No plane parts were found.
a reply to: hellobruce
and WTC2.
Once the 'jet' hit the revonovated, hardened and almost empty
pentagon, the Naval auditors and records were 100% destroyed.
Not one flight data recorder was found but a muslim passport was.
How did that happen. Where was the wreckage in the Penssylvania
crash? No plane parts were found.
a reply to: hellobruce
edit on 3-1-2016 by Drawsoho because: spelling
a reply to: Drawsoho
That's not true.
That's not true.
History
No plane parts were found.
The fireball from the plane, which was carrying 7,000 gallons of fuel, scorched hundreds of acres of earth and set the surrounding trees ablaze for hours. The crash site near Shansksville was littered with the wreckage from the fragmented plane, with a debris field scattered nearly eight miles away from the initial point of impact. Despite the devastation, investigators were able to recover both the plane’s flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder, or black box, which was found burrowed more than 25 feet below ground. Though few human remains were recovered at the site, medical examiners were eventually able to positively identify the 33 passengers, seven crewmembers and four hijackers aboard Flight 93.
edit on
3-1-2016 by TNMockingbird because: more specific
originally posted by: Drawsoho
I suppose you can produce evidence - records, bills, receipts ect?
I know you cannot and no one has ever said the 2.3 trillion dollars
was ever accounted for. (Smiling Rumsfeld.)
reply to: Zaphod58
It was never missing. Rumsfeld's statement has been taken out of context to make it seem like the money was missing. It wasn't, and therefore can be "accounted" for.
His statement was in regards to tracking certain transactions with the current technology they have, not that the money is missing.
edit on
3-1-2016 by introvert because: (no reason given)
a reply to: Drawsoho
Four of the 8 data recorders were found, as was 3/4ths of the plane at Shanksville. It was in the ground, where it should have been.
You think that they kept paper records of transactions for military purchases? Really? And that the Navy was doing the audit? The Office of the Inspector General does any auditing and they are from all branches of the service, not just from one.
Four of the 8 data recorders were found, as was 3/4ths of the plane at Shanksville. It was in the ground, where it should have been.
You think that they kept paper records of transactions for military purchases? Really? And that the Navy was doing the audit? The Office of the Inspector General does any auditing and they are from all branches of the service, not just from one.
All the details is in this video about the scientific evidence regarding the fall of the buildings and other matters.
On the tenth anniversary of the Attacks of September 11th, 2001, expert witnesses gathered at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada to provide evidence-based research that called into question the official story of 9/11. This was known as The Toronto Hearings on 9/11