Truther Thread

a reply to: Informer1958

Damage control?

So you'll be able to post an excerpt from the study showing where it said conspiracy theorists are smarter, right?

I bet you haven't even read the study.
I bet you didn't even read the link I gave, written by the author of the paper YOU referenced!

But it's damage control...pathetic.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
You do know what disinformation is, eh?

dis·in·for·ma·tion
false information that is intended to mislead,

Like the truther claims thermite was used, or explosives, or mini nuclear weapons, or beam weapons from space....

Yes, we know what disinformation is!

So...essentially it's the OS

So 4 planes were not hijacked?
So no planes hit the WTC towers, or the Pentagon?
So just what do you not believe about what happened on 9/11?

a reply to: PublicOpinion

3...2...1... ignition! A visual artists who obviously doesn't have a clue what they actually found in the dust, hence which temps we're talking about.

Let's take a look here.

RJ Lee Group Dust Sample Report

RJ Lee Group Dust Sample Chart

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
You do know what disinformation is, eh?

dis·in·for·ma·tion
false information that is intended to mislead,

Like the truther claims thermite was used, or explosives, or mini nuclear weapons, or beam weapons from space....

Yes, we know what disinformation is!

So...essentially it's the OS

So 4 planes were not hijacked?
So no planes hit the WTC towers, or the Pentagon?
So just what do you not believe about what happened on 9/11?

I don't believe George Bush managed to read that school book.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: PublicOpinion

Nobody explained LabTops threads...

Just to give you an update, his seismic interpretations have been debunked by the very folks who were operating their seismic machines. How did the 9/11 conspiracy community somehow overlook that fact?

...or just Lee Groups findings to you by now? Pity.

Amazing. Show it then? So far all youve been able to is produce exactly what I predicted you would, which I already refuted 3 times. Pity? for you then I assume?


Your spikes as measured by the Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. Are these fakes?

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

That won't fly and those video time lines prove my case, which is why you have failed to post the video time line references where he've claimed, explosions were heard.

How many times are you going to say that, you think the membership has a memory of two minutes? Another lie from you, we have been through this 100 times.geez

a reply to: wildb

Thats the one I was looking for..

And this is what I was talking about at the start of this thread.

The story about the study finding conspiracy theorists are smarter is bogus.

Informer gets a free pass though, coz he's on your side.

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: wildb

Thats the one I was looking for..

And this is what I was talking about at the start of this thread.

The story about the study finding conspiracy theorists are smarter is bogus.

Informer gets a free pass though, coz he's on your side.

And SkyEagle has been getting freepasses from the OS-side since hes on ATS. Your point?

And I have never seen an OS-er correcting another OS-er. I have seen it on the truther-side many times. And if you havent Im willing to show you and do it myself.

originally posted by: whatsup86

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: wildb

Thats the one I was looking for..

And this is what I was talking about at the start of this thread.

The story about the study finding conspiracy theorists are smarter is bogus.

Informer gets a free pass though, coz he's on your side.

And SkyEagle has been getting freepasses since hes on ATS. Your point?

Double standard ?

ENOUGH!

Calling or alluding to other members as being "Shills" is NOT tolerated ANYWHERE on ATS.

Understand?

Several members in this and other 9/11 threads are coming close to a line that none of you want to cross.

Keep your debates civil. If you can not, your posting rights will be removed.

Do not reply to this post.

a reply to: wildb

Check your PMs.

a reply to: whatsup86

Your spikes as measured by the Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. Are these fakes?

No, and in fact, the Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory has confirmed that their seismic monitors did not detect demolition explosions.

It was Obama. Is that it settled now?

a reply to: whatsup86

Facts and evidence has been presented and confirmed by those who have responded that their seismic monitors did not detect demolition explosions, which are confirmed by those WTC videos.

Here is one example and please point out where demolition explosions are heard.



No demolition explosions were heard in that video, which explains why demolition explosions were not detected by seismic monitors in the area.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: whatsup86

Facts and evidence has been presented and confirmed by those who have responded that their seismic monitors did not detect demolition explosions, which are confirmed by those WTC videos.

Here is one example and please point out where demolition explosions are heard.

No demolition explosions were heard in that video, which explains why demolition explosions were not detected by seismic monitors in the area.

Again sky lack of audio proves nothing, when will you figure that out.

a reply to: whatsup86

I can't speak for others, but if I felt skyeagle was in error, I would speak up.

I have, on many occasions corrected people on the debunker side.

And you've obviously never met Phage have you?

a reply to: skyeagle409

And now you come up with a study you never fully understood in the first place. Yes I know about that report! Or to use your words:
let's remember that I actually invited you various times to discuss it's findings.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Chuckle away!



It wouldn't be half that entertaining here without you.