It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LittleByLittle
a reply to: Aazadan
I agree that you should use debate and keep cultures separate until they can live side by side peacefully. But we are not allowed that by those who want quick cultural changes in the world. Technology has forced humanity to be connected to the whole to soon and many cultures are not ready to be scrutinized and debated.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
Did he sign the forms and go through the correct process though?
Kick him out before he spreads anymore lefty propaganda.
originally posted by: combatmaster
a reply to: zazzafrazz
He's lucky Chuck Norris wasnt around to beat his a$$
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: LittleByLittle
By trample I mean exert influence on. Why does the superior culture have the right to overrun, change, rule, exploit, harm, or manipulate the inferior culture? If they're happy with their lives, then why not let them be and try to coexist? They have their borders, we have ours.
Every instance of the stronger culture meeting the weaker culture in human history has either resulted in a genocide, very bloody resistance, or police state.
If you want to change a culture do it through debate. If you're right, those in power or those who eventually take power will agree with you and change but change happens slow so you have to be patient. If you're wrong, atleast the world is more peaceful.
One culture believing they have all the answers figured out, and trying to change the backwards one who believes different has been the motivation behind how many deaths throughout history? Where has it gotten us? The truth is, not one of us whether the culture is based on religion, economic philosophy, government structure, military policy, or anything else has gotten it right yet.
originally posted by: radarloveguy
originally posted by: combatmaster
a reply to: zazzafrazz
He's lucky Chuck Norris wasnt around to beat his a$$
Good work Superguy/Ramjet
Chuck is Superman's friend , and I don't think
he's racist.
Besides Superman would whip his ass , then fly him to the moon !
As a fictional oppressed minority, mutants are often used as extended metaphors for real-world people and situations. In 1982, X-Men writer Chris Claremont said, "[mutants] are hated, feared and despised collectively by humanity for no other reason than that they are mutants. So what we have here, intended or not, is a book that is about racism, bigotry and prejudice."
Much of the appeal and draw of the mutants that comprise the X-Men has to do with feeling like an outcast while simultaneously feeling like part of a family. Mutants are ostracized because they are different but they bound together because of their differences. The may be forced together to a certain extent like 'real' families but they are also a team. They differ from other teams such as the Justice League, which is like a meritocracy; only the best of the best join that team. In contrast, the X-Men is composed of outcasts. They train and nurture one another and are united by common goals and beliefs. ...the whole theme of the X-Men — the isolation of mutants and their alienation from 'normal' society — be read as a parable of the alienation of any minority... of a minority grouping determined to force its own place within society
originally posted by: woodwardjnr
Superman was clearly a commie with that red flag he uses as a cape he has PC cultural Marxist agenda. He was an illegal alien. Has he ever had his papers checked?
He's a strange visitor from another world who can change the course of mighty rivers, bend steel in his bare hands'Ķand who, as the champion of the common worker, fights a never-ending battle for Stalin, Socialism and the international expansion of the Warsaw Pact.A deftly written alternate take on the mythos of the Man of Steel, RED SON explores the classic tale of Superman's origins'Ķif his rocketship had landed in the Soviet Union rather than Smallville, Kansas.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
IMHO...I don't think "talk" is un-American. Censorship is un-American. Discrimination is un-American.
originally posted by: LittleByLittle
a reply to: zazzafrazz
Would have been possible if all religions/faith/culture where equal. But they are not. Culture is not equal and give the people living in it equal opportunity/rights.
Where do you draw the line at you tolerance of practice of religion/faith?
Will you be tolerant of Nazi if they create a religion?
Will you be tolerant of a KKK religion inspiring race hate against people of other skin color?
Do you think Zionist (the Jewish version of supremacist) should be tolerated even if they are creating Apartheid systems against Palestinians?
Should you be tolerant of the Wahhabi (ISIS/taliban) who say all should be Muslim or pay them tribune or die that have scripture on their side?
Wahhabi/Salafi/Conservative or muslim/Muslim that are inspired by sufi teachings? Where do you draw the line?
"Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.
originally posted by: piney
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: LittleByLittle
By trample I mean exert influence on. Why does the superior culture have the right to overrun, change, rule, exploit, harm, or manipulate the inferior culture? If they're happy with their lives, then why not let them be and try to coexist? They have their borders, we have ours.
Every instance of the stronger culture meeting the weaker culture in human history has either resulted in a genocide, very bloody resistance, or police state.
If you want to change a culture do it through debate. If you're right, those in power or those who eventually take power will agree with you and change but change happens slow so you have to be patient. If you're wrong, atleast the world is more peaceful.
One culture believing they have all the answers figured out, and trying to change the backwards one who believes different has been the motivation behind how many deaths throughout history? Where has it gotten us? The truth is, not one of us whether the culture is based on religion, economic philosophy, government structure, military policy, or anything else has gotten it right yet.
The sixties first showed signs of marxism
Free love make peace not war
The communists crept into your schools and
Instatutions to change your values
So you would kill your unborn babies
Promote homosexuality
Encourage women to disobey men
To have contempt for men
To reject God
This Marxism is not designed to be ongoing
To create some Marxist utopia
This is designed to destroy you all
Most of you are under the Marxist yoke
If you call someone crazy you have become a Marxist stooge
If you call someone a racist you are a Marxist stooge
More rights for women Marxism
More rights for homosexuals Marxism
I believe it started with the French revolution
When God was removed from power
And democracy began to take over the world
There was a report in Germany just before
The 2nd world war
A room full of Jew's were found by the Nazis
At a university they had all this Marxist propaganda
I don't think the Jew's started it
They embraced it because they were a minority in Europe they were fooled
It will take decades to reverse the damage
That Marxism has done to the world