It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Gryphon66
They are strictly going by how much the person's body looks like the gender in question. If there is an adam's apple on the transgender female - they say "it's a male and he's going to rape us!"
originally posted by: Darth_Prime
a reply to: ketsuko
And the second amendment makes it easier to Kill people...is that fair?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Darth_Prime
And this bill makes it easier for heterosexual men to do so under the cover of being trans.
I've heard this before. What keeps these throngs of heterosexual men from raiding Women's Bathrooms now?
I mean, it'd be illegal either way, right? If there's as great a undercurrent of this potential abuse in our society?
How do we solve this conundrum? Does everyone have to be properly "sexed" like chickens or cattle before we use public facilities?
originally posted by: Darth_Prime
a reply to: Metallicus
Do you know how long Trans people have been around?.. maybe it's all this "Hateful Madness" that is making things worse
originally posted by: Darth_Prime
a reply to: ketsuko
And the second amendment makes it easier to Kill people...is that fair?
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Darth_Prime
a reply to: ketsuko
And the second amendment makes it easier to Kill people...is that fair?
Life isn't fair. Didn't your parents ever teach you that?
Being in a minority isn't always fair and sometimes you have to just adapt to world around you. I live with fluorescent lights because there is no way I'm going to get the world to service my needs. It's just one of the unfair things about having fluorescent lighting as a migraine trigger.
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
At the expense of an interesting argument, I return to the topic.
So this bill that did not pass, did not actually do anything to prevent discrimination against anyone who was not already covered under state & federal laws. The article even states, this is the issue. So what's the loss ? What's so terrible about a bill (that doesn't do anything already being done in various statutes) failing ?
To be more specific, where is the harm in the failure of this bill to pass ?
originally posted by: Darth_Prime
a reply to: ketsuko
Come talk to me about fair when you get attacked and murdered for having Migraines
In the NCAVP 2009 report on hate violence, 50 percent of people who died in violent hate crimes against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people were transgender women; the other half were male, many of whom were gender non-conforming.7 Sexual assault and/or genital mutilation before or after their murders was a frequent occurrence.
Acts of hate violence, such as harassment, stalking, vandalism, and physical and sexual assault, are often supported by more socially sanctioned expressions of transphobia, biphobia, and homophobia and are intended to send a message to LGBTQ communities. . . . Many LGBTQ people also face substantial bias because they belong to other traditionally marginalized groups along other axes of identity such as race, class, incarceration history, immigration status, or ability. . . . membership in more than one traditionally marginalized community can increase targeting for severe violence.
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
I am trying to remember the last time I was in a public restroom where someone, anyone, male, female, straight, gay, trans were openly displaying their genitals. I have been in a few bars and seen it, but the folks so dead set against this probably don't frequent these types of bars.
ETA: With public showers in HS and MS locker rooms, this question would become a bit more of an issue, at least in my mind. Not the rape factor, but the understanding factor.