It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Biden also said Tuesday that only two people in the meeting were definitive in their advice to the President, contradicting Clinton's account of how she supported the mission.
There were "only two people who were definitive and were absolutely certain," he said, referring to the men who were, respectively, the director of the CIA and the secretary of defense at the time. "Leon Panetta said, 'Go,' and Bob Gates -- who has already publicly said this -- said, 'Don't go.' And others were at 59/41."
In her 2014 book "Hard Choices," Clinton writes that she was an immediate supporter while Biden "remained skeptical."
.
originally posted by: Blazemore2000
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
It's just his un-clever way of calling Bernie a socialist.
originally posted by: whyamIhere
That didn't sound like he wasn't running.
After his first sentence...The rest was a Campaign Speech.
originally posted by: Annee
What would he be campaigning for?
That's meant to be a serious question.
originally posted by: Blazemore2000
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
It's just his un-clever way of calling Bernie a socialist.
originally posted by: introvert
Not surprised. Clinton has had this race in the bag pretty much since she announced her run. While many people do not like Clinton and would love to vote for someone else, too many cannot get past the idea of a self-described socialist or a Republican in the office. I'd like to see Sanders win, but that is not going to happen in my opinion.
Perhaps if the GOP was not the party of nutters and theocratic loons, they would be able to pull some votes from the Dems, but that is not going to happen this time around.
originally posted by: Blazemore2000
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
It's just his un-clever way of calling Bernie a socialist.
originally posted by: buster2010
Not socialist communist seeing how he said Bernie would go to his home in Russia.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: whyamIhere
That didn't sound like he wasn't running.
After his first sentence...The rest was a Campaign Speech.
What would he be campaigning for?
That's meant to be a serious question.
originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: stosh64
So, basically, you've chosen which one you want to believe.
They're both politicians.
I was looking forward to Him and Hillary arguing about who told Obama what about Bin Laden.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: MotherMayEye
What if they can't stand either and break for Donald?
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
a reply to: yeahright
Sorry, I don't even know what that means...
On Nov. 8, 2016, Clinton will start — start — with a minimum 247 of the 270 electoral votes she needs to win. If you give her Colorado and Virginia — which many political strategists would, given the Hispanic population in one and the rising influence of the northern-centered population in the other — she’ll start with 269. That means Clinton doesn’t need Ohio or Florida. She just needs one small state like Iowa, Nevada or New Hampshire to put her over the edge. And because she’s got a boatload of money and no viable primary challenger, she’ll have plenty of time and resources to lock up at least one of those states.