Stephen Hawking: “The laws of science are sufficient, we don't need God."

Putting $50 on Hawking to believe in God on his death bed .

.... just sayin'

a reply to: radarloveguy
He's been officially on his deathbed for quite a while now.
www.ninds.nih.gov...

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: radarloveguy
He's been officially on his deathbed for quite a while now.
www.ninds.nih.gov...

.... and I'm STILL waiting for him to concede !

Really Hawkings ? The physicist that was brought down by a NJ USA plumber ? Reminded him matter can not be created nor destroyed fully. Something must remain. Now the total disregard for a theory becoming more popular among theoretical physicists that the more they learn , the more the evidence for a creation or a virtual reality ?

a reply to: Gothmog

Really Hawkings ?

Hawking.

The physicist that was brought down by a NJ USA plumber ?

What?

Now the total disregard for a theory becoming more popular among theoretical physicists that the more they learn , the more the evidence for a creation or a virtual reality ?

What evidence?

if everything must have a creator Who created this god that created the universe? Man? God is a human concept.

a reply to: Isurrender73

You CANNOT prove the existence of a god.

Therefore,there are none.

a reply to: Frocharocha

Which Stephen Hawking said that? The one with the buck bottom teeth or the one without the buck teeth?

What Stephen fails to understand is that, the so called laws of science are man made
a reply to: Frocharocha

a reply to: Nochzwei
Science is a methodology. I'm not sure what you're trying to say.

a reply to: radarloveguy

You'll be dissaponted, then.

a reply to: Frocharocha

S&f thanks for sharing.
And he is right, we only need god to explain and justify our human nature not the universe.
Well i do, but i have a unique definition of god.

a reply to: Frocharocha

I would expect no less from this incredible and fascinating human being.

He has an IQ that shadow most of us lesser humans in this earth.

His reasoning is no hindered by religious believes, Is statistics done that shows that highly intelligent people are not particular religious, but many consider themselves spiritual.

Hawking statement is absurd.


How did all this science and reality generate itself from nothing?


Who or what designed this awesome universe?


Who and what mysterious force upholds all this energetic reality that pervades the universe?

He doesn’t know or understand he is an ignorant, arrogant person.


One doesn't have to believe in the various theologies with their nuances but for a so called scientist to reject God is the height of ignorance and arrogance imo...

Here's a theoretical physicist who has provided overwhelming, hard, mathematical evidence for the existence of a universal pattern or blueprint embedded in sacred geometries of the world's religions that reproduces in analogous form the group mathematics of the two symmetry groups proved in superstring theory to be free of quantum anomalies:
smphillips.8m.com...
In pioneering research, he shows that the Tantric Sri Yantra, the Kabbalistic Tree of Life, the first four Platonic solids and the disdyakis triacontahedron embody exactly the same numbers in their geometries as the number of vertices and edges of the Gosset polytope, which mathematicians know is the polytope representation of the 240 roots of the rank-8 exceptional Lie group E8 at the heart of superstring theory. In other words, he has shown that a scientific theory of the forces of nature is expressed in the mathematics of the sacred geometries of certain religions - a true conjunction of science and religion!
O.K. You may never have heard of him. But study his research. It speaks for itself. He does not need to pontificate about whether God exists or not. He has quietly settled the age-long issue beyond reasonable doubt through rigorous mathematical research that demonstrates the existence of astounding, hitherto unknown connections between religions and discoveries in particle physics and molecular biology that can be explained only in terms of an intelligent, cosmic design that underpins matter and self-replicating systems - one that is mathematically perfect.

a reply to: micpsi

whatever

that does not compute with computer generated voice systems

no one ever questions the need to keep steves legacy going by pretending he is still functional brain in any form that is coherent with a first grader

excellent addition you put forth

And yet, both scientific and religious explanations of universal origin require plenty of assumptions.

Labs like CERN are changing our understanding of physical existence on a regular basis. Hawking's intellect may be on par with Einstein, but his statements convey none of the humility his predecessor was known for. Hawking exemplifies the hubris plaguing the modern scientific community.

a reply to: micpsi

Lol! "overwhelming, hard, mathematical evidence for the existence of a universal pattern or blueprint" my Chapman pocket!! You've spammed this link a few times, it doesn't get any more credible.

Steve at this point is having a hard time proving he is alive much less any thing else.

No one can prove that the computer is saying all this stuff and not originating from him.

Not much difference in hubris between what we think we hear him saying and what ai would say.

Can any prove me wrong or do you all just go on faith?

a reply to: Frocharocha

S&F to you!

He is right: first of all the M theory does make a lot of sense as it can explain the 'birth' of 'this universe' (see I say 'this universe' as there are probably others out there). But it doesn't even matter if we still don't know or are unsure, that is the beauty of science, we are learning something new every day....

During the interview he offered an explanation of how our universe came to be without a God, and the explanation was this question:

"What was God doing before the divine creation? Was he preparing hell for people who asked such questions?"

Absolute genious!