It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Using that excuse is like hiding all the abortions of convenience behind the excuses of rape, medical necessity and incest which really make up about 5% of the abortions.
Multiple politicians and media outlets have been invoking, in the wake of this fake scandal, the idea that “taxpayer funded abortions” are taking place at Planned Parenthood and this means the organization should be defunded.
This is a lie, full stop.
The Hyde Amendment, which was passed in 1976, prevents federal money from funding abortion.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
And even Planned Parenthood's services are 97% well woman check ups, contraceptives, etc. Only 3% are elective abortions.
originally posted by: ChiefD
But I am a mere woman. A woman who feels It's nobody's damn business what I want to do with my body.
cant cure stupid
originally posted by: Mugly
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
a reply to: Mugly
True, but it's better to have it there should they need or want it than to not have it at all. Call that pragmatic if nothing else, eh?
i agree.
it certainly does not hurt.
still though. cant cure stupid
originally posted by: grandmakdw
originally posted by: Bovah2
How about people just stop having sex without a condom or birth control medicine if they don't want the risk of having a baby?
If a woman wants to poke around in herself with a bent rusty coat hanger, let her. If she wants to ingest some foreign mystery pill to hopefully abort, let her.
If you can't control your own body and actions, by showing some restaraint when you have no condoms, or no money to afford condoms, then sorry, but you get what you deserve.
Keep your # in your pants, problem solved.
TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR OWN ACTIONS.
STOP LOOKING FOR A GOVERNMENT BAILOUT!
Darwin rules!
The people who refuse to keep it in their pants when they don't have a condom or birth control.
Well if the women are stupid enough to abort with coat hangers,
one less person that far down on the Darwinian chain.
Seriously, if you have no problem with babies dying,
why would you have a problem with women so stupid
they can't say no and have zero self control or any
willingness to take personal responsibility,
why would you have a problem with them taking
the Darwin leap?
Cold, yes, but if you love abortion,
you should have no problem with
self abortion through stupidity
that could end in the blob of
tissue formerly known as
ex-mom falling off the Darwinian cliff.
Whats the difference to the pro-abortion supporter,
one less person overpopulating the world?
Seriously, the pro-abortion people seem
to think that no one should take any responsibility for
their actions, and that everyone should be getting it on
like rabbits, because we can't expect any human
being to exercise any kind of self-control.
That's what I seem to hear the pro-abortion crowd say.
All people are so stupid they must have sex, it is
required to have sex with anyone and everyone
all the time, and no one should ever, ever, be
expected to exercise good judgement and use
a condom or keep their pants on, that is too much
to expect of any human being.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
You might also be interested in this article.
The Rise of the DIY Abortion in Texas
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: Annee
It can't hurt to have more than ONE option available to men. Women have spermicides, diaphrams, IUDs, pills, implants, shots, nuvaring...
Men have: condom.
Or a vasectomy....I had mine at 20 yrs of age. I knew then that kids just simply didn't fit in to my lifestyle. I have never regretted not having kids!
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
a reply to: grandmakdw
I would dare say there are very few, if any, pro-abortion people in this country. And if there are I would also dare say they are probably not the ones you accuse and target here.
Love abortion? What kind of hyperbole is this now?
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Mugly
a great deal of doctors will not perform a vasectomy unless the guy is a certain age or has x amount of kids.
Is that true? I thought vasectomies were reversible.