It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Astral projection and the Great Pyramid

page: 3
<< 1  2   >>

log in


posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 07:46 AM
a reply to: Harte

post removed

edit on 2-8-2015 by purplemer because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 08:26 AM

originally posted by: Kantzveldt
a reply to: EA006

Of course my astral projections are based on Cairo 4,500 years ago

of course it's much, much older.

posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 09:29 AM
a reply to: Kantzveldt

would a different sized 180 ° Protractor result in the Pyramid Star Shafts pointing to different stars ! ?

it seems to me actual observation of the present night sky through the shafts would be the only correct answer...
as to where an Astral Projection would actually be the destination...

talk about being 'in the right time and place'... the Earth Precession limits the Stars one can Astral Project towards during their informed/adult lifetime

once again are the Pyramid star shafts and the 180 degree Protractor overlay the proper size or ratio for each other ?

posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 11:19 AM
a reply to: St Udio

No any protractor of a suitable size will indicate the same and the stars needed to be evaluated according to when the Pyramid was built not present configurations, the star shafts are indicated at the angle they project from within the pyramid super-structure, so the angles indicated would not correspond to the angle if measured from the ground, in the same way that the Grand Gallery while at an angle of 26 degrees projects to around 33.5 from it's relative position.

posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 11:29 AM
@JBARNES - thank you for your support!
(there are more decoded monument video's to follow)

@Kantzveldt - the interpretation given to the Great Pyramid's interior as a replication in geometrics of our solar system is a snapshot frozen in time to an exact alignment, creating a future date.

@Harte - The cracking of the relieving chamber Lintels is also speculated to have happened from an internal explosion..or the backlash of a great tsunami (the one that deposited the sea crustacean's). The point is all 3 are hypothetical speculations and none are proven, which does not disqualify the ingenious design feature and it's one-off explanation of dispersing weight distribution.

new topics

top topics
<< 1  2   >>

log in