It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Care to share that response and elaborate on the details of said reference?
whatever dude, if there wasn't anything dodgy going on, why did the government hurriedly destroy the evidence,..
What evidence? Provide the evidence for all to see, that the government hid evidence. If you are unable to provide that evidence for us all, you have no case.
In his New Yorker article, posted on the magazine’s web site last week, Lawrence Wright tells how the Bush administration deleted 28 pages in the 2002 report of the Joint Congressional Inquiry on 911 probably because they describe in detail the Saudi connection to the Al Qaeda attack and Saudi financing of its operatives in the United States—people who knew two of the hijackers, and may well have been used as conduits for Saudi cash. Some of the money may have come from the royal family through a charity.
Since you have been unable to produce evidence of explosives in the dust samples, there is not much else to say.
In his New Yorker article, posted on the magazine’s web site last week, Lawrence Wright tells how the Bush administration deleted 28 pages in the 2002 report of the Joint Congressional Inquiry on 911 probably because they describe in detail the Saudi connection to the Al Qaeda attack and Saudi financing of its operatives in the United States—people who knew two of the hijackers, and may well have been used as conduits for Saudi cash. Some of the money may have come from the royal family through a charity.
US judge dismisses 9/11 case against Saudi Arabia
A US judge has dismissed claims against Saudi Arabia by families of victims of the September 11, 2001, attacks, who accused the country of providing material support to al-Qaeda.
www.aljazeera.com...
He has a great case, there is no evidence, it was shipped away ASAP..
Why did NIST not Consider a “Controlled Demolition
Some 200 technical experts—including about 85 career NIST experts and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia—reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests and sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they began to collapse.
www.webcitation.org...
Bush administration deleted 28 pages
Provide the evidence for all to see, that the government hid evidence
Lawyers for the plaintiffs said they would appeal. Sean Carter, one the lawyers, said he believed the ruling was also the consequence of the US government's decision to keep classified evidence that could be favourable to their cause.
They deleted 28 pages and hid evidence, didn't they? Rhetorical question, beware of the snakepit.
officials' handling of the evidence of the September 11th attack has followed a clear pattern. the physical evidence most important to forensic analysis of the crime was destroyed or removed from the crime scene never to be seen again. types of evidence not under the direct control of those officials were suppressed through a variety of means.TThese include photographs, video footage, and various once-public documents
Officials have refused to release video footage of the Pentagon attack beyond the five frames released in early 2002. There must be dozens of cameras on the Pentagon grounds that recorded the attack.
Detailed engineering drawings of the Twin Towers and Building 7 have remained unavailable to the public.
There is abundant evidence that there were concerted programs to remove evidence from the three known sites of carnage on September 11th: Ground Zero in Manhattan,....
... the west wing and lawn of the Pentagon,
... and the debris fields of Flight 93 in Pennsylvania.
This is particularly true of the Pentagon, where a mop-up operation by officials commenced immediately after the attack.
The evidence that fire, in conjunction with impact damage, was responsible for the collapse of the WTC buildings can be found in videos, photos, and in the seismic data, which debunks the claim that demo explosions were used.
originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: PublicOpinion
They deleted 28 pages and hid evidence, didn't they? Rhetorical question, beware of the snakepit.
What were in those 28 pages? I want to know the details.
originally posted by: Flatcoat
a reply to: drommelsboef
Lord...I always get slightly nauseas reading JREF threads. One big neverending, psuedo-intellectual circle-jerk. I particularly "like" the last comment about why they referred to an external index for the resistance of paint, instead of testing the chips they found in the dust. The obvious answer being that they didn't know for sure what the chips were....so they used an external reference to compare. God there's some morons over there....
Over 90% of the wreckage of United 93 was recovered from the crash site where radar contact was lost. United Airlines announced the loss of United 93.
United reported flight 93 landed in Cleveland first..
United 93 did not land at Cleveland Airport
The story in question, an Associated Press bulletin, was posted on WCPO.com during the morning of September 11, 2001. The story stated that Flight 93 landed in Cleveland. This was not true.
A review of WEWS Cleveland Channel 5's live coverage of White's comments that day show that he never suggested that the grounded plane parked at the end of a Hopkins runway was United 93.
"Let me walk through the most current situation that we are grappling with," says White at the brief press conference. "At this moment, we have a Boeing 767 in a secure area of Hopkins International Airport. The initial reports were that this plane was hijacked and that there was a bomb on board. There was, before this, an additional plane in our airspace. I am told through unconfirmed reports that we could hear screaming in the control tower. This plane has been diverted from Cleveland and at last report was in the Toledo airspace."
Later, we would learn that this 767 was Delta flight 1989. It had originated from the same Boston airport as United 93, but was cleared by inspectors after landing at Hopkins. It had not been hijacked, and there was no bomb. And United 93, by the way, was a 757...
www.911myths.com...