It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neoholographic
YOU DON'T THINK IT CHANGES ANYTHING??
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: neoholographic
YOU DON'T THINK IT CHANGES ANYTHING??
I think it provides some additional confirmation of what most astrobiologists already believed, based on the wealth of information they already had on exoplanets.
So, sure -- this provides a level of confirmation for what they already thought to be true, but it's not like this changes what they already thought to be true.
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
a reply to: neoholographic
You're missing my point.
Yes -- This changes the notion of whether or not planets exist that have been in the habitable zone for at least as long as Earth has been in a habitable zone. In that respect, this is a major finding. However, prior to this finding, astrobiologists never said that it is a requirement for life that a planet be in the habitable zone for as long as Earth has been.
...I mean, they know that life began on Earth after only less than 1 billion years, so obviously it is NOT a requirement that a planet needs to be in a habitable zone for 5 or 6 billion years.
originally posted by: neoholographic
originally posted by: B4dg3r
this is amazing news
Exactly!!
Some key points!
Earth like planets are "quite common" in our universe.
Kepler 452-b is around 6 billion years old and has remained in it's habitable zone longer than earth.
This is like finding a needle in a haystack based on our limited view as to how life forms.
There's NOTHING preventing life from forming on other planets unless life on earth has some special ingredient designed by a Creator that can't be duplicated anywhere else in the universe.
HUGE NEWS!!
originally posted by: RoScoLaz4
eventually one of these planets will be declared to not only seem ideal for life to exist, but to factually, actually, harbour life. i think we'll be discovering many more such planets over the coming years. cool!
originally posted by: antar
Why are people ok with findings of microbial life but not other species including but not limited to humanoid of nature?
Is it ego related or some other base fear/shame?
This is a descent step forward in the microsteps it will take to bring humanity up to actual speed, so dont it blow humanity, let 'them' know you can handle the truth...
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
No life has been found, throw this into the HOAX bin for the way the title is worded.
The planet is supposedly larger, older, similar star, in the zone where liquid water is a possibility (but so is Mars but it is dry as a bone).
If it has life why haven't we been receiving their old I love Lucy broadcasts and other such activity across any spectrum of output? It is older than Earth and only has 1400 years for signals to reach here.
The standard internet meme applies here, pics or it didn't happen.
originally posted by: antar
Why are people ok with findings of microbial life but not other species including but not limited to humanoid of nature?
Is it ego related or some other base fear/shame?