It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Stormie
"Most people ‘in the know’ realize that NASA is just part of the military industrial complex, but a recent open admission on mainstream news that “there are indications of alien life” is likely the beginning of a bid to get your undivided attention before full-forced disclosure ensues."
Stofan goes on to say:
“We’re on the verge of things that people have wondered about for millennia. Within all of our lifetimes we’re going to understand that there is life on other bodies in the solar system. We’re going to understand the implications of that for life here on Earth.”
for full article:
themindunleashed.org...
(please forgive, as i didn't know whether this thread belonged in conspiracies or here, ehe~)
originally posted by: Komodo
NADA (the better term for NASA) defines life on other planets as ....water...
The amount of people chomping at the bit for disclosure
The term is 'champing at the bit' a common misinterpretation.
originally posted by: Komodo
NADA (the better term for NASA) defines life on other planets as ....water...
Two new papers based on data from NASA's Cassini spacecraft scrutinize the complex chemical activity on the surface of Saturn's moon Titan. While non-biological chemistry offers one possible explanation, some scientists believe these chemical signatures bolster the argument for a primitive, exotic form of life or precursor to life on Titan's surface. According to one theory put forth by astrobiologists, the signatures fulfill two important conditions necessary for a hypothesized "methane-based life."
originally posted by: rationalconsumer
originally posted by: Stormie
a reply to: swanne
"spirit science" in general has said a lot of things i think go beyond possibly even common sense. but, they've also said a lot of good things, and posted lots of good, credible articles. nothing is 100% proof. not even what our eyes can see can always be called proof. but, i think it's important to share this. like i said, many times this page has proven to be credible despite their obvious flaws and mistakes.
Which is more credible: a source that uses logical analysis and evidence for all of its content, or one that seems to have no filter and therefore sometimes gets it right and sometimes gets it wrong with no method to the madness?
originally posted by: ClandestineKid
I knew this thread tittle would be completely wrong. If NASA admired to the existence of aliens the ATS forum wouldn't be the first place I'd hear about it. The media would have been thrown into frenzy. When the Queen Mother died they interrupted every TV station in the UK to bring you the "Important" message and stopped TV for the day. If NASA had admitted to knowing alien life is in our solar system every nation in the world would be having an emergency bank holiday and the world would have stopped turning!
originally posted by: Osito
Well it is not a reliable source but it is true... Although, it seems that all of it may happen in 20~30 years according to the article.
Please guys, next time make sure you read the articles but making hype over nothing
originally posted by: Verum1quaere
“The UFOnauts and the demons of past days are probably identical.”